<t> It is now like the "new" ones ie CC IV & later with the limiting force pool etc based on the strategic map without the flexibility that the original had. Frankly liked CC2 & CC3 the best because of that, the original developer was daft when they took some idiot gaming mag rag's confusion to ...

<t> Played the old series a ton when they came out. I noted in playing the game, the UI changes that were made - honestly rather have the older in game UI.<br/>
<br/>
The newer game at higher resolution makes those Unit, Minimap and Force menus very hard to read. Their position on the screen is ...

<t> Way back when after CC3 around the time of CC4 release, I had opportunity to meet some of the Atomic Games development crew including Keith Zabalouie.<br/>
<br/>
They were making a change which is familiar in the subsequent releases, but it is my opinion at least, led to the downfall of Atomic ...

<t> I noted the new makeup of the game which is taken from CC4+. While those provided good strategy level layer to the game, the BG limitations were very frustrating with CC4+ vs CC2 & 3 that you could create any encounter you desired as far as force mix. The removal of that feature was a key factor ...

<t> I bought all the CC releases you guys remade. Was playing Cross of Iron (CC3) and then saw this and got it. It plays way different for certain.<br/>
<br/>
The thing is that enemy units (AI) have almost perma stealth even with friendly units virtually on top of them. In Cross of Iron at that ...