Playing time?

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
Marco70
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2019 6:29 am
Location: Germany

Playing time?

Post by Marco70 »

I need help deciding if this game is for me. From what I understand, it's more of a passion than a game.
But how many hours do you need to invest in the WITP campaign? I've seen some videos, the first turn took 9 hours to do all the settings for the allies. In this one he was clicking every single unit / base and explains a lot, but many others were in the 3-4 hour range. Is this effort reduced in the following turns?
If a turn is a day, then the campaign lasted a decade of my time.

What do you think?
User avatar
btd64
Posts: 13892
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 12:48 am
Location: Lancaster, OHIO

RE: Playing time?

Post by btd64 »

Welcome. Time spent depends on your experience with the game. As a new player you will spend a lot of time setting up your first couple of turns. but then they get easier. I've been playing this game for over 10 years and I still spend 6 to 8 hours setting up my first turn. But it is a lot of fun to me. Do you have the game yet? I would read some AAR's and play the smaller scenarios to start....GP
Intel i7 4.3GHz 10th Gen,16GB Ram,Nvidia GeForce MX330

AKA General Patton

DW2-Alpha/Beta Tester
SCW Manual Lead & Beta Support Team

"Do everything you ask of those you command"....Gen. George S. Patton
User avatar
kbfchicago
Posts: 364
Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2009 4:46 pm
Location: NC, USA
Contact:

RE: Playing time?

Post by kbfchicago »

Concur with GP. Early turns are definitely a marathon, not a sprint. Some additional perspective...

The game is rich in detail, to include "games within the game". If you like that, you'll find yourself willingly spending more time on details like pilot training, production (Japanese only), Political Point strategy, etc.. Most of the posts I've seen over the years on the topic of time spent reflect experienced players get into a rythmn and complete typical turns in 45-90 minutes. That has been my experience as well.

You can speed the overall conduct of the game by stepping up the turn cycle. You have three options, 1 day, 2 day, or 3 day turns. Most on the forum play 1 day turns. Personally I'm an advocate for 2 day turns. You can see details on a recent discussion about this here: https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=4790036

If you like highly detailed, complex, mulitlayered strategy games, perhaps mixed with a love of history, then WITP-AE is likely for you. Which ever way you go...

Happy gaming,

Kevin
MacBook Pro / WITP-AE running in Parallels v15.x
User avatar
Yaab
Posts: 5445
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2011 2:09 pm
Location: Poland

RE: Playing time?

Post by Yaab »

ORIGINAL: Marco70

I need help deciding if this game is for me. From what I understand, it's more of a passion than a game.
But how many hours do you need to invest in the WITP campaign? I've seen some videos, the first turn took 9 hours to do all the settings for the allies. In this one he was clicking every single unit / base and explains a lot, but many others were in the 3-4 hour range. Is this effort reduced in the following turns?
If a turn is a day, then the campaign lasted a decade of my time.

What do you think?

Yep, first turn is special. As Allies, it takes me 35-40hrs to setup the first turn, but I am methodical and give orders to most bases/units/ships/air groups following my own created checklist. The next few following turns can also take some time, since many LCUs and ships arrive at new destinations. But after that, I can process a turn in 1-1,5hrs, micro-managing things with much Tracker-gazing.

GetAssista
Posts: 2835
Joined: Sat Sep 19, 2009 6:13 am

RE: Playing time?

Post by GetAssista »

Marco, if you are a perfectionist you will have a hard time. This game has a lot of details and loads of switches/valves/microdecisions to make to get everything exactly right. It is easier if you are more of a broad strategist with a casual view on details and minmaxing.

Still worth it in any case. But that's a biased point of view of course :D
User avatar
Lowpe
Posts: 24582
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:25 pm

RE: Playing time?

Post by Lowpe »

ORIGINAL: GetAssista

Marco, if you are a perfectionist you will have a hard time. This game has a lot of details and loads of switches/valves/microdecisions to make to get everything exactly right. It is easier if you are more of a broad strategist with a casual view on details and minmaxing.

Still worth it in any case. But that's a biased point of view of course :D

I have done the first turn in pbems as Japan in as few as 15 minutes. The normal turn around probably averages around half and hour to an hour per turn after. I simply don't do everything at once -- it is a long war.

User avatar
dr.hal
Posts: 3535
Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 12:41 pm
Location: Covington LA via Montreal!

RE: Playing time?

Post by dr.hal »

Marco please try not to focus on the complexity of the game, for that need not be the deciding factor. If you are interested in obtaining a deeper understanding of the Pacific theater in WW2 and getting a better feel for the complexities of that campaign at the strategic level, then this game is for you no matter how complex. And make no mistake, this game is complex. I started playing the BOARD game version of this LONG before the computer version was even thought of (late 70s) and then switched over (gladly) to the various version of this Matrix game. I say this not to illustrate how old I am but to tell you that I'm still learning things about the game and the theater of operations. Yes it will demand your time, but it does get "easier" once understood. But that time will be enjoyable if your interests are as I have described AND if playing the Allies you don't mind getting your ass kicked for the first six months of the game! Enjoy.
User avatar
Mike McCreery
Posts: 4293
Joined: Sat Jun 29, 2013 2:58 pm

RE: Playing time?

Post by Mike McCreery »

Lets forget the first 10 turns. After that it depends on the type of person you are.

Some people keep detailed notes, some just fly by their pants. Some need to check every unit every turn and some people set things up and forget them.

So, for each person it is different. In the normal game a turn takes me probably about 30 minutes to an hour to play. That excludes maintenance and planning. Because you do not have to change/move/alter every piece on every turn the game will speed up quickly after the beginning.

Image
User avatar
Marco70
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2019 6:29 am
Location: Germany

RE: Playing time?

Post by Marco70 »

Thanks for your numerous feedback, it helps me a lot.
Ok, i understand that the first round is more work than the following ones. Do i get messages in a clear way when my units finish their orders after one, two, three days, so i can minimize micromanagement per round?
User avatar
Bo Rearguard
Posts: 607
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2008 9:08 pm
Location: Basement of the Alamo

RE: Playing time?

Post by Bo Rearguard »

Starting this game is sort of like cranking up a gargantuan machine. You spend hours, days, weeks depending on your patience tweaking and adjusting this dial, indicator or switch. However, once you finally hit the start button and the Pacific War colossus sputters to life and is up and running it kind of has its own momentum. All those convoys you dispatched across the vast ocean will be days if not weeks from their destinations. They won't require any more management unless they stumble across a submarine or stray into an area possibly covered by hostile air patrols. All those CAP and air training missions pretty much do their thing with no more input unless in direct conflict with the enemy. Most of the backwater area of the vast map is in relative peace. The hard part is sometimes remembering that task force you sent out days ago or that air squadron still languishing in the outback. Other exciting events come up at the front lines and you tend to overlook the routine things happening in the background.

But that's the beauty of the thing. [8D]
"They couldn't hit an elephant at this dist ...." Union General John Sedgwick, 1864
User avatar
Mike McCreery
Posts: 4293
Joined: Sat Jun 29, 2013 2:58 pm

RE: Playing time?

Post by Mike McCreery »

ORIGINAL: Marco70

Thanks for your numerous feedback, it helps me a lot.
Ok, i understand that the first round is more work than the following ones. Do i get messages in a clear way when my units finish their orders after one, two, three days, so i can minimize micromanagement per round?

There is an operations report that will tell you when task forces and air groups arrive at bases. I dont think it is the same for armies so you have to check them. I just keep a list of moving units and expected arrival dates.
Image
User avatar
PaxMondo
Posts: 10261
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 3:23 pm

RE: Playing time?

Post by PaxMondo »

The first few turns are very long, then about an hour after that. Exceptions to that hour turn length are when setting up the next big action, offensively or defensively. Those turns look like an initial turn again as you are tasking 100's of units … but these aren't all that often. Then you watch it all play out, making little tweaks as you go. I look at it this way:

Strategic Turns: +3 hours. can be days.
Tactical Turns: 1 hour, or less.
Pax
User avatar
jdsrae
Posts: 2795
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2010 6:58 am
Location: Gandangara Country

RE: Playing time?

Post by jdsrae »

I recommend against trying to enter orders while watching Letterkenny at the same time
Currently playing my first PBEM, no house rules Scenario 1 as IJ.
AAR link (no SolInvictus): https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=4684655
Dili
Posts: 4742
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 4:33 pm

RE: Playing time?

Post by Dili »

In most calm days i could do a 15 min turn - but still have to see the turn playing so another 5 or so minutes on top of that. As Japan which is more complicated then Allies since it has industry to manage. In a big operation yes you can spend 2 days, by 2 days i mean 2-4 hours split by 2 days.

The biggest secrets of managing the game is to know to what detail you should deal and what detail you should not deal with. And never get loose the big picture, the attraction to predominantly think at tactically/local level is always present, at least for me.
User avatar
jmscho
Posts: 126
Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2004 11:36 am
Location: York, UK

RE: Playing time?

Post by jmscho »

When I came back to WitP-AE about 18 months ago, I was swamped by the increase in detail after playing a lot of WitP (pre AE) and having a break. However, I'd say I'm a bit of a data freak. Since then I've learnt about the detail. Initially using the spreadsheets in Kull's posts (thanks), and adapting them - sometimes a lot.
I only play Japan so have only had to understand half of the data involved.
First turn takes me about 8-10 hours over 4-5 days.
Subsequent turns take about 1 hour, but I do it in two sessions. First watching the combat replay and inspecting some units/bases/sightings for the effect of what has happened. Later, after mulling over what has happened and how my plans are going, I input the orders.
Future operation planning is done outside the normal game cycle - using dumps of data from Tracker.
Ian R
Posts: 3440
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Cammeraygal Country

RE: Playing time?

Post by Ian R »

ORIGINAL: Marco70

I need help deciding if this game is for me. From what I understand, it's more of a passion than a game.
But how many hours do you need to invest in the WITP campaign? I've seen some videos, the first turn took 9 hours to do all the settings for the allies. In this one he was clicking every single unit / base and explains a lot, but many others were in the 3-4 hour range. Is this effort reduced in the following turns?
If a turn is a day, then the campaign lasted a decade of my time.

What do you think?

If you go into a turn, and micromanage everything, every time, it not only takes a long time, but is probably creating inefficiencies - because you re-rout some cargo TF you already re-routed two days ago because you changed your mind or whatever. You may think all that micromanagement is squeezing every drop of logistics out, but you could be sailing things round in circles.

To create a more time-efficient game process, you can limit somethings to once a (game) week, e.g. -

- Do sub ops on Wednesday's

- Check your main supply origin ports and hub ports on Thursdays

- ship reinforcements out to the front lines on Friday

- check your pilots in training air groups on Saturday (could be a once a month job)

- check aircraft and ship upgrades on Sunday

Etc. I am sure once you start playing the game you will develop your own protocols.

Obviously there are exceptions, such as the arrival of a new capital ship, or the various bits of the 1st Marine Division being assembled ASAP.
"I am Alfred"
kentcol
Posts: 153
Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 3:37 pm

RE: Playing time?

Post by kentcol »

ORIGINAL: Yaab
ORIGINAL: Marco70

I need help deciding if this game is for me. From what I understand, it's more of a passion than a game.
But how many hours do you need to invest in the WITP campaign? I've seen some videos, the first turn took 9 hours to do all the settings for the allies. In this one he was clicking every single unit / base and explains a lot, but many others were in the 3-4 hour range. Is this effort reduced in the following turns?
If a turn is a day, then the campaign lasted a decade of my time.

What do you think?

Yep, first turn is special. As Allies, it takes me 35-40hrs to setup the first turn, but I am methodical and give orders to most bases/units/ships/air groups following my own created checklist. The next few following turns can also take some time, since many LCUs and ships arrive at new destinations. But after that, I can process a turn in 1-1,5hrs, micro-managing things with much Tracker-gazing.


Would you mind sharing your checklist?
User avatar
BBfanboy
Posts: 20288
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Contact:

RE: Playing time?

Post by BBfanboy »

Because I cannot remember stuff the way I used to, I label my convoys with their mission: e.g. 'Coastal AA 2 Noumea'. Then when I roll the cursor over it at sea, that label will show up and I don't have to click on the convoy to know what it is. Strange quirk though, if the TF only has one ship, the label you write will not show up on the rollover.
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
User avatar
PaxMondo
Posts: 10261
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 3:23 pm

RE: Playing time?

Post by PaxMondo »

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

Because I cannot remember stuff the way I used to, I label my convoys with their mission: e.g. 'Coastal AA 2 Noumea'. Then when I roll the cursor over it at sea, that label will show up and I don't have to click on the convoy to know what it is. Strange quirk though, if the TF only has one ship, the label you write will not show up on the rollover.
Yeah, I do the same. Huge help. I wish LCU's could have a label as well … I talked it over with MichaelM, there just wasn't space in the detail page to add it in. [:(]
Pax
LeeChard
Posts: 1116
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 12:24 pm
Location: Michigan

RE: Playing time?

Post by LeeChard »

You can slim down the workload some by concentrating your first orders on the front line units and combat TFs.
In real life(IRL)not every unit, base and ship at sea recieved orders throughout the pacific on day one anyway.
Skedaddle your shipping in the Philippines, Hong Kong and Singapore etc. I create some TFs of submarines and send them to Pearl, Soerbaja or Brisbane and operate from there after I've assigned a bunch from Manila(some of the smaller subs use smaller old torpedoes that actually work!)
This might be a more realistic response to the first day, I think, and give the AI a better chance of giving you a good game in my humble opinion [;)]
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”