Page 1 of 1

Are BG Civil war scenarios shorter/smaller?

Posted: Wed Jan 05, 2011 3:19 am
by coastie_slith
I bought Napoleonic Wars and I like the game style and the mechanics. What I find though is that the larger battles, Waterloo & Borodino, are just overwhelming. Instead I've played all the Quatre Bras variants a bunch of times and really like that level of complexity. Even something like Ligny, although it's short, still has a ton of units to move & shoot every turn.

Does Civil War have more in the way of the smaller scenarios? I don't mind ones that are a small segment of a larger battle (like in Waterloo & NIR) but I do prefer something that is a self-contained battle like Quatre Bras.

RE: Are BG Civil war scenarios shorter/smaller?

Posted: Wed Jan 05, 2011 3:13 pm
by simovitch
The Civil War Battles offer a lot of battles that are more manageable than Waterloo and especially Borodino. I found even Gettysburg to be less daunting...

RE: Are BG Civil war scenarios shorter/smaller?

Posted: Thu Jan 06, 2011 2:15 am
by lordhoff
In addition, many of the games (can't remember if all of them) have additional battles; some lead up to the main battle and some completely unrelated such as Wilson Creek.

RE: Are BG Civil war scenarios shorter/smaller?

Posted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 12:48 am
by coastie_slith
Thanks for the replies, I'll probably pick it up then. It'll be neat to use different armies as well.