Is Sapporo connected?

Gary Grigsby's strategic level wargame covering the entire War in the Pacific from 1941 to 1945 or beyond.

Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

User avatar
mc3744
Posts: 1957
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 5:04 pm
Location: Italy

Is Sapporo connected?

Post by mc3744 »

After over one year of playing exclusively the Allies I'm now giving it a shot with the Japs.

I brought oil to Sapporo, but it disappears in 1-2 turns. Is Sapporo connected to the main Island?
What other Islands are connected? (movement-wise)

Thanks [&o]
Nec recisa recedit
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: Is Sapporo connected?

Post by witpqs »

That might depend on what pwhex file you are using. Here is how to see for certain.

Press the 'R' key. That will toggle on the display of the trail/road/rail network.

You can also press the 'F6' key, which will show hexsides. That will tell you if land units can move across the hexsides.
AmiralLaurent
Posts: 3351
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2003 8:53 pm
Location: Near Paris, France

RE: Is Sapporo connected?

Post by AmiralLaurent »

oil/resources/supplies will cross one hex of water if there is a port on each size. In the case of Sapporo, it is linked in this way with the Japanese mainland.

Just drop oil and resources in a Japanese port, and let the computer mess around with them. It seems to me it will bring enough for HI to work everywhere each turn, but I'm sure that any dump you will create outside Sasebo, Tokyo or Osaka will be moved by the computer shortly thereafter.

On the other hand remember to drop oil in Indochina, Formosa and China/Korea, and resources in Formosa, or you will have a part of your HI not working. You have some months before taking care of this anyway due to pre-war stocks.
Ursa MAior
Posts: 1414
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2005 10:10 am
Location: Hungary, EU

RE: Is Sapporo connected?

Post by Ursa MAior »

Thx this was really useful
Image
Art by the amazing Dixie
User avatar
mc3744
Posts: 1957
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 5:04 pm
Location: Italy

RE: Is Sapporo connected?

Post by mc3744 »

Yes it was!!! [:)]

Thanks [&o]
Nec recisa recedit
User avatar
Sardaukar
Posts: 12349
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Finland/Israel

RE: Is Sapporo connected?

Post by Sardaukar »

IIRC; the ports have to be size 5 or bigger for resources, supply, oil etc. to "jump" over the water.
"To meaningless French Idealism, Liberty, Fraternity and Equality...we answer with German Realism, Infantry, Cavalry and Artillery" -Prince von Bülov, 1870-

Image
Xargun
Posts: 4396
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2004 11:34 pm
Location: Near Columbus, Ohio
Contact:

RE: Is Sapporo connected?

Post by Xargun »

ORIGINAL: Sardaukar

IIRC; the ports have to be size 5 or bigger for resources, supply, oil etc. to "jump" over the water.

Size 5 ?? I thought only size 3 was required. I believe that is what the manual says - but it has been wrong in the past. Has anyone done any actual tests ?

Xargun
The Duke
Posts: 94
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 6:30 pm
Location: Austin, TX

RE: Is Sapporo connected?

Post by The Duke »

So does this mean that oil dropped at Singapore can be fed to industry in Manchuria, assuming Japanese owned roads/railways in between????
 
 
User avatar
Mynok
Posts: 12108
Joined: Sat Nov 30, 2002 12:12 am
Contact:

RE: Is Sapporo connected?

Post by Mynok »


Yes.

Also, oil tends to move to the farthest north location in northern Japan. For instance, if you dump a bunch in Toyohara (sp?) on Sakhalin Is. It will then migrate to the city north of it. It will still get moved to the factories in time for production, so long as it is on the railroad.

"Measure civilization by the ability of citizens to mock government with impunity" -- Unknown
User avatar
mc3744
Posts: 1957
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 5:04 pm
Location: Italy

RE: Is Sapporo connected?

Post by mc3744 »

I've been playing almost daily for over two years [8|] ... and I'm still learning!!! [X(]

Thanks guys [:)]
Nec recisa recedit
Xargun
Posts: 4396
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2004 11:34 pm
Location: Near Columbus, Ohio
Contact:

RE: Is Sapporo connected?

Post by Xargun »

ORIGINAL: The Duke

So does this mean that oil dropped at Singapore can be fed to industry in Manchuria, assuming Japanese owned roads/railways in between????

Yes and no. Oil/Resouces travel furthest on rails, but roads cut the length it travels down a lot. So Oil dropped in Singapore may feed into Bagkok and maybe Saigon / Camranh Bay but thats it. Its kinda like supplies - it only moves so far per turn. And the further it travels the less that gets moved.

You're better off dropping off oil in Singapore (for Singapore only) and dropping off in Saigon for there.

Xargun
User avatar
tsimmonds
Posts: 5490
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2004 2:01 pm
Location: astride Mason and Dixon's Line

RE: Is Sapporo connected?

Post by tsimmonds »

I take oil to Singapore, Saigon, Formosa, Shanghai, Hong Kong, the Home Islands, and Foochow. Think of each port as serving a hinterland of Heavy Industry. Singapore also serves Bangkok. Saigon also serves Hanoi. Shanghai serves the mainland, etc. It is a simple matter to total the HI requirements of these regions, factor in oil production within the region, and come up with how much oil you need to haul to each port.

Clearing the rail line in China means something[;)]
Fear the kitten!
Xargun
Posts: 4396
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2004 11:34 pm
Location: Near Columbus, Ohio
Contact:

RE: Is Sapporo connected?

Post by Xargun »

ORIGINAL: irrelevant
Clearing the rail line in China means something[;)]

Exactly. The rail line in china is very important for moving not only oil / resources to the ports, but for moving supply around between bases - and not to mention quick troop movement as well.

Xargun
User avatar
Sardaukar
Posts: 12349
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Finland/Israel

RE: Is Sapporo connected?

Post by Sardaukar »

ORIGINAL: Xargun
ORIGINAL: Sardaukar

IIRC; the ports have to be size 5 or bigger for resources, supply, oil etc. to "jump" over the water.

Size 5 ?? I thought only size 3 was required. I believe that is what the manual says - but it has been wrong in the past. Has anyone done any actual tests ?

Xargun

I think limit is size 5, since I play CHS with Andy's 6.2/6.3 map and supply doesn't seem to jump from Wellington to base in south (not present in stock anyway)...and while Wellington is built up to 9 (IIRC), other base is max 4.

I can be wrong..but to me it seems so.
"To meaningless French Idealism, Liberty, Fraternity and Equality...we answer with German Realism, Infantry, Cavalry and Artillery" -Prince von Bülov, 1870-

Image
User avatar
Andrew Brown
Posts: 4082
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Hex 82,170
Contact:

RE: Is Sapporo connected?

Post by Andrew Brown »

ORIGINAL: Sardaukar
I think limit is size 5, since I play CHS with Andy's 6.2/6.3 map and supply doesn't seem to jump from Wellington to base in south (not present in stock anyway)...and while Wellington is built up to 9 (IIRC), other base is max 4.

I can be wrong..but to me it seems so.

Interesting. I added that base - Picton - to allow supplies to go to the NZ South Island, as I also thought that the base size for this was 3. If it is really 5 then I will have to reconsider!

Andrew
Information about my WitP map, and CHS, can be found on my WitP website

Image
User avatar
mc3744
Posts: 1957
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 5:04 pm
Location: Italy

RE: Is Sapporo connected?

Post by mc3744 »

If I knew how many things I was missing I would have posted sooner!

[:D][:D]
Nec recisa recedit
User avatar
Sardaukar
Posts: 12349
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Finland/Israel

RE: Is Sapporo connected?

Post by Sardaukar »

ORIGINAL: Andrew Brown

ORIGINAL: Sardaukar
I think limit is size 5, since I play CHS with Andy's 6.2/6.3 map and supply doesn't seem to jump from Wellington to base in south (not present in stock anyway)...and while Wellington is built up to 9 (IIRC), other base is max 4.

I can be wrong..but to me it seems so.

Interesting. I added that base - Picton - to allow supplies to go to the NZ South Island, as I also thought that the base size for this was 3. If it is really 5 then I will have to reconsider!

Andrew

I'm not 100 % sure. It might just be that I don't have enough supplies in north to that happen. After 1.8 patches bases are really stingy when it comes to supply flow..[:'(]. But I'll try to dump 30k or something to Wellington to see what happens.
"To meaningless French Idealism, Liberty, Fraternity and Equality...we answer with German Realism, Infantry, Cavalry and Artillery" -Prince von Bülov, 1870-

Image
User avatar
Sardaukar
Posts: 12349
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Finland/Israel

RE: Is Sapporo connected?

Post by Sardaukar »

For Andrew Brown and others interested:

It seems that at least supply doesn't "jump" from port to port when under size of 5. AB's map, New Zealand: Picton is size 4, Wellington size 9 (or was it 8, don't remember). Wellington is "orange", low on supply. I dumped 45 000 supply on Picton and waited 10 days. No supply moved to Wellington during that time. So, I think the minimum size of port is 5 even when manual says it's 3. Couldn't test oil & resources, tho.

Can anyone confirm this ?
"To meaningless French Idealism, Liberty, Fraternity and Equality...we answer with German Realism, Infantry, Cavalry and Artillery" -Prince von Bülov, 1870-

Image
User avatar
VSWG
Posts: 3217
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 5:04 pm
Location: Germany

RE: Is Sapporo connected?

Post by VSWG »

See this thread for some tests:

tm.asp?m=1305034
Image
User avatar
Raverdave
Posts: 4882
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2002 5:00 pm
Location: Melb. Australia

RE: Is Sapporo connected?

Post by Raverdave »

ORIGINAL: mc3744

After over one year of playing exclusively the Allies I'm now giving it a shot with the Japs.




Turncoat. [:'(]
Image


Never argue with an idiot, he will only drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.
Post Reply

Return to “War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945”