
Name This AE...303
Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami
Name This AE...303
???



SCW Beta Support Team
Beta Team Member for:
WPO
PC
CF
AE
WiTE
Obi-wan Kenobi said it best: A lot of the reality we perceive depend on our point of view
- Hornblower
- Posts: 1361
- Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2003 1:02 am
- Location: New York'er relocated to Chicago
RE: Name This AE...303
Oz troops during the battle of Milne Bay
RE: Name This AE...303
Type 95 HA GO?
- Anthropoid
- Posts: 3107
- Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2005 1:01 am
- Location: Secret Underground Lair
RE: Name This AE...303
Wow those Te-Ke's are tough aren't they!?
The x-ray is her siren song. My ship cannot resist her long. Nearer to my deadly goal. Until the black hole. Gains control...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IkIIlkyZ ... playnext=3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IkIIlkyZ ... playnext=3
RE: Name This AE...303
They'll still in one piece..... [:D]
- Hornblower
- Posts: 1361
- Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2003 1:02 am
- Location: New York'er relocated to Chicago
RE: Name This AE...303
IIRC the Japanese tanks got bogged down before they could be knocked out, but after they broke the AIF Bat. on the 1st day/night of the battle
RE: Name This AE...303
yup. Bergerud (Touched by Fire) says the two tanks were instrumental along with Japanese night attacks in defeating the Oz Bn (1st/10). He does not ID the tanks though. so i'm left with my guess. [:D]
RE: Name This AE...303
Yes, Light Tank Type 95, HA-GO. Normally equipped the organic tank companies/platoons of the Infantry divisions, and the Individual brigades. Also yes at Milne Bay after the Japanese landing there.

When you see the Southern Cross, For the first time
You understand now, Why you came this way
RE: Name This AE...303
Seriously...can you really classify those....those.....those... things as 'tanks'? [:D]
TOMLABEL
TOMLABEL

Art by the Rogue-USMC
WITP Admiral's Edition: Ship & Sub Art/Base Unit Art/Map Icon Art
"If destruction be our lot - it will come from within"...Abraham Lincoln
RE: Name This AE...303
Sure you can... Same way you can classify an IJA rifle as an effective firearm. It helps if you get drunk and squint first...
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
RE: Name This AE...303
ORIGINAL: TOMLABEL
Seriously...can you really classify those....those.....those... things as 'tanks'? [:D]
TOMLABEL
I invite you to go after them with rifles and machineguns and still laugh at them [;)]
Surface combat TF fanboy
RE: Name This AE...303
ORIGINAL: Terminus
Sure you can... Same way you can classify an IJA rifle as an effective firearm. It helps if you get drunk and squint first...
Dad raised my brother and I on weapons from that war, (and earlier), but nothing, NOTHING, beats a Chaut Chaut, and yes, I have.

RE: Name This AE...303
I think the IJA should have been issued a major fine for littering there...
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
-
- Posts: 37
- Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 6:34 am
RE: Name This AE...303
At Milne Bay the Japanese tanks apparently ran out of ammo pretty quickly but hard charges or something for the shells still on hand and killed a number of Australians with the muzzle blasts. The Australians also found out the the lights on the tanks were reflected from mirrors to protect them from bullets, etc.
-
- Posts: 893
- Joined: Wed May 30, 2001 8:00 am
RE: Name This AE...303
"IJA rifle as an effective firearm"
Arguably one of the best bolt guns of WW2. Own several of them myself. I personally think the SMLE was the best bolt gun, but that's just my opinion, and I've actually carried one of the jungle carbine versions patrolling.
7.7mm was a decent round, the 6.5mm had low recoil and smokeless powder...great for jungle warfare. Earlier on, Allied troops often carried the carbine models by choice as they had nothing better for the purpose. Japan the first to introduce chrome bores. Pre and early/mid-war production weapons very well made. Reportedly the strongest action of the Mauser based guns. IIRC, Weatherby(?) used early production Japanese actions postwar by preference to make their custom magnum weapons, in fact.
IJA tanks, if effectively supported by infantry, would be exactly what an infantry support tank should be...an armored, mobile, weapons support platform. One with lousy armor and lousy guns, but that's still better than being on the receiving end, bare nekkid with no anti-armor weapons. As someone (correctly) pointed out earlier, they were decent tanks by 1930's standards. Possibly even better than decent. World moved on, rapidly, the IJA didn't. Unsupported, they weren't much good. Backed by IJA infantry, used properly IAW IJA doctrine...useful. Still couldn't have paid me money to fight in one of the POS...
Arguably one of the best bolt guns of WW2. Own several of them myself. I personally think the SMLE was the best bolt gun, but that's just my opinion, and I've actually carried one of the jungle carbine versions patrolling.
7.7mm was a decent round, the 6.5mm had low recoil and smokeless powder...great for jungle warfare. Earlier on, Allied troops often carried the carbine models by choice as they had nothing better for the purpose. Japan the first to introduce chrome bores. Pre and early/mid-war production weapons very well made. Reportedly the strongest action of the Mauser based guns. IIRC, Weatherby(?) used early production Japanese actions postwar by preference to make their custom magnum weapons, in fact.
IJA tanks, if effectively supported by infantry, would be exactly what an infantry support tank should be...an armored, mobile, weapons support platform. One with lousy armor and lousy guns, but that's still better than being on the receiving end, bare nekkid with no anti-armor weapons. As someone (correctly) pointed out earlier, they were decent tanks by 1930's standards. Possibly even better than decent. World moved on, rapidly, the IJA didn't. Unsupported, they weren't much good. Backed by IJA infantry, used properly IAW IJA doctrine...useful. Still couldn't have paid me money to fight in one of the POS...
RE: Name This AE...303
Mk1 (Mod b) Bolo.
RE: Name This AE...303
ORIGINAL: juliet7bravo
IJA tanks, if effectively supported by infantry, would be exactly what an infantry support tank should be...an armored, mobile, weapons support platform. One with lousy armor and lousy guns, but that's still better than being on the receiving end, bare nekkid with no anti-armor weapons. As someone (correctly) pointed out earlier, they were decent tanks by 1930's standards. Possibly even better than decent. World moved on, rapidly, the IJA didn't. Unsupported, they weren't much good. Backed by IJA infantry, used properly IAW IJA doctrine...useful. Still couldn't have paid me money to fight in one of the POS...
agreed. Bergerud stated their participation was critical in the defeat of the 1st BN. Other later war Allied tanks may have outclassed the Type 95 but that becomes irrelevent when they aint there to oppose them. Just ask the Chinese.
RE: Name This AE...303
Type 95 HA GO, it is[:)]
Milne Bay, it is[:)]
Austrailian Troops, it is[:)]
It is, Thompson M1928A1
...................
From Taki's Sight:
Type 95 Light Tank "Ha-Go"
Introduced Year : 1934
Weight : 6.7 ton
Dimensions: 4.3 x 2.07 x 2.28(h) m
Armor (max) : 12 mm
Speed (max) : 40 km/hr
Engine : Diesel Engine 120 PS/1800 rpm
Armaments : Type 94 37 mm or Type 98 37mm (Late Model) x 1, Type 97 7.7 mm x 2
Crew : 3
Production Qty : 2,375
Good speed and high reliability tank, but its armor is very weak and its gun is also poor. Ha-Go was produced in the most numbers of Japanese AFVs. Widely used until the end of WWII.
Milne Bay, it is[:)]
Austrailian Troops, it is[:)]
It is, Thompson M1928A1
...................
From Taki's Sight:
Type 95 Light Tank "Ha-Go"
Introduced Year : 1934
Weight : 6.7 ton
Dimensions: 4.3 x 2.07 x 2.28(h) m
Armor (max) : 12 mm
Speed (max) : 40 km/hr
Engine : Diesel Engine 120 PS/1800 rpm
Armaments : Type 94 37 mm or Type 98 37mm (Late Model) x 1, Type 97 7.7 mm x 2
Crew : 3
Production Qty : 2,375
Good speed and high reliability tank, but its armor is very weak and its gun is also poor. Ha-Go was produced in the most numbers of Japanese AFVs. Widely used until the end of WWII.

SCW Beta Support Team
Beta Team Member for:
WPO
PC
CF
AE
WiTE
Obi-wan Kenobi said it best: A lot of the reality we perceive depend on our point of view
-
- Posts: 893
- Joined: Wed May 30, 2001 8:00 am
RE: Name This AE...303
Have to wonder why the IJA didn't build assault guns ala the Stug, or more SPGs. Would have "fit" with their mindset and doctrine, and been cheap conversions. A tankette hull mounting one of their little 70mm infantry support guns and an MG would have been useful. Ditto a HA GO with a 75mm pack howitzer. Stug type assault gun built on a HA GO chassis with a high velocity 47mm, very, very useful.