Name This AE...303

Gary Grigsby's strategic level wargame covering the entire War in the Pacific from 1941 to 1945 or beyond.

Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

User avatar
Brady
Posts: 6051
Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2002 12:48 pm
Location: Oregon,USA

Name This AE...303

Post by Brady »

???








Image







Image


SCW Beta Support Team

Beta Team Member for:

WPO
PC
CF
AE
WiTE

Obi-wan Kenobi said it best: A lot of the reality we perceive depend on our point of view
User avatar
Mark VII
Posts: 1845
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2003 6:41 am
Location: Brentwood,TN

RE: Name This AE...303

Post by Mark VII »

Brit patrol passing some Jap outhouses.
Image
User avatar
Hornblower
Posts: 1361
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2003 1:02 am
Location: New York'er relocated to Chicago

RE: Name This AE...303

Post by Hornblower »

Oz troops during the battle of Milne Bay
User avatar
Nikademus
Posts: 22517
Joined: Sat May 27, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Alien spacecraft

RE: Name This AE...303

Post by Nikademus »

Type 95 HA GO?
User avatar
Anthropoid
Posts: 3107
Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2005 1:01 am
Location: Secret Underground Lair

RE: Name This AE...303

Post by Anthropoid »

Wow those Te-Ke's are tough aren't they!?
The x-ray is her siren song. My ship cannot resist her long. Nearer to my deadly goal. Until the black hole. Gains control...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IkIIlkyZ ... playnext=3
User avatar
Nikademus
Posts: 22517
Joined: Sat May 27, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Alien spacecraft

RE: Name This AE...303

Post by Nikademus »

They'll still in one piece..... [:D]
User avatar
Hornblower
Posts: 1361
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2003 1:02 am
Location: New York'er relocated to Chicago

RE: Name This AE...303

Post by Hornblower »

IIRC the Japanese tanks got bogged down before they could be knocked out, but after they broke the AIF Bat. on the 1st day/night of the battle
User avatar
Nikademus
Posts: 22517
Joined: Sat May 27, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Alien spacecraft

RE: Name This AE...303

Post by Nikademus »

yup. Bergerud (Touched by Fire) says the two tanks were instrumental along with Japanese night attacks in defeating the Oz Bn (1st/10). He does not ID the tanks though. so i'm left with my guess. [:D]
User avatar
DivePac88
Posts: 3119
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2008 9:50 pm
Location: Somewhere in the South Pacific.

RE: Name This AE...303

Post by DivePac88 »

Yes, Light Tank Type 95, HA-GO. Normally equipped the organic tank companies/platoons of the Infantry divisions, and the Individual brigades. Also yes at Milne Bay after the Japanese landing there.
Image
When you see the Southern Cross, For the first time
You understand now, Why you came this way
User avatar
TOMLABEL
Posts: 4473
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2006 7:50 pm
Location: Alabama - ROLL TIDE!!!!!

RE: Name This AE...303

Post by TOMLABEL »

Seriously...can you really classify those....those.....those... things as 'tanks'? [:D]

TOMLABEL
Image
Art by the Rogue-USMC

WITP Admiral's Edition: Ship & Sub Art/Base Unit Art/Map Icon Art

"If destruction be our lot - it will come from within"...Abraham Lincoln
User avatar
Terminus
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: Name This AE...303

Post by Terminus »

Sure you can... Same way you can classify an IJA rifle as an effective firearm. It helps if you get drunk and squint first...
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
User avatar
String
Posts: 2661
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2003 7:56 pm
Location: Estonia

RE: Name This AE...303

Post by String »

ORIGINAL: TOMLABEL

Seriously...can you really classify those....those.....those... things as 'tanks'? [:D]

TOMLABEL

I invite you to go after them with rifles and machineguns and still laugh at them [;)]
Surface combat TF fanboy
User avatar
m10bob
Posts: 8583
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 9:09 pm
Location: Dismal Seepage Indiana

RE: Name This AE...303

Post by m10bob »

ORIGINAL: Terminus

Sure you can... Same way you can classify an IJA rifle as an effective firearm. It helps if you get drunk and squint first...


Dad raised my brother and I on weapons from that war, (and earlier), but nothing, NOTHING, beats a Chaut Chaut, and yes, I have.
Image

User avatar
Terminus
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: Name This AE...303

Post by Terminus »

I think the IJA should have been issued a major fine for littering there...
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
HMAS Sydney
Posts: 37
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 6:34 am

RE: Name This AE...303

Post by HMAS Sydney »

At Milne Bay the Japanese tanks apparently ran out of ammo pretty quickly but hard charges or something for the shells still on hand and killed a number of Australians with the muzzle blasts.  The Australians also found out the the lights on the tanks were reflected from mirrors to protect them from bullets, etc. 
juliet7bravo
Posts: 893
Joined: Wed May 30, 2001 8:00 am

RE: Name This AE...303

Post by juliet7bravo »

"IJA rifle as an effective firearm"
 
Arguably one of the best bolt guns of WW2.  Own several of them myself.  I personally think the SMLE was the best bolt gun, but that's just my opinion, and I've actually carried one of the jungle carbine versions patrolling.
 
7.7mm was a decent round, the 6.5mm had low recoil and smokeless powder...great for jungle warfare.  Earlier on, Allied troops often carried the carbine models by choice as they had nothing better for the purpose.  Japan the first to introduce chrome bores.  Pre and early/mid-war production weapons very well made.  Reportedly the strongest action of the Mauser based guns.  IIRC, Weatherby(?) used early production Japanese actions postwar by preference to make their custom magnum weapons, in fact.
 
IJA tanks, if effectively supported by infantry, would be exactly what an infantry support tank should be...an armored, mobile, weapons support platform.  One with lousy armor and lousy guns, but that's still better than being on the receiving end, bare nekkid with no anti-armor weapons.  As someone (correctly) pointed out earlier, they were decent tanks by 1930's standards.  Possibly even better than decent.  World moved on, rapidly, the IJA didn't.  Unsupported, they weren't much good.  Backed by IJA infantry, used properly IAW IJA doctrine...useful.  Still couldn't have paid me money to fight in one of the POS...
User avatar
mlees
Posts: 2263
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2003 6:14 am
Location: San Diego

RE: Name This AE...303

Post by mlees »

Mk1 (Mod b) Bolo.
User avatar
Nikademus
Posts: 22517
Joined: Sat May 27, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Alien spacecraft

RE: Name This AE...303

Post by Nikademus »

ORIGINAL: juliet7bravo

IJA tanks, if effectively supported by infantry, would be exactly what an infantry support tank should be...an armored, mobile, weapons support platform.  One with lousy armor and lousy guns, but that's still better than being on the receiving end, bare nekkid with no anti-armor weapons.  As someone (correctly) pointed out earlier, they were decent tanks by 1930's standards.  Possibly even better than decent.  World moved on, rapidly, the IJA didn't.  Unsupported, they weren't much good.  Backed by IJA infantry, used properly IAW IJA doctrine...useful.  Still couldn't have paid me money to fight in one of the POS...

agreed. Bergerud stated their participation was critical in the defeat of the 1st BN. Other later war Allied tanks may have outclassed the Type 95 but that becomes irrelevent when they aint there to oppose them. Just ask the Chinese.
User avatar
Brady
Posts: 6051
Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2002 12:48 pm
Location: Oregon,USA

RE: Name This AE...303

Post by Brady »

 Type 95 HA GO, it is[:)]

Milne Bay, it is[:)]

Austrailian Troops, it is[:)]

It is, Thompson M1928A1

...................

From Taki's Sight:

Type 95 Light Tank "Ha-Go"

Introduced Year : 1934
Weight : 6.7 ton
Dimensions: 4.3 x 2.07 x 2.28(h) m
Armor (max) : 12 mm
Speed (max) : 40 km/hr
Engine : Diesel Engine 120 PS/1800 rpm
Armaments : Type 94 37 mm or Type 98 37mm (Late Model) x 1, Type 97 7.7 mm x 2
Crew : 3
Production Qty : 2,375

Good speed and high reliability tank, but its armor is very weak and its gun is also poor. Ha-Go was produced in the most numbers of Japanese AFVs. Widely used until the end of WWII.
Image


SCW Beta Support Team

Beta Team Member for:

WPO
PC
CF
AE
WiTE

Obi-wan Kenobi said it best: A lot of the reality we perceive depend on our point of view
juliet7bravo
Posts: 893
Joined: Wed May 30, 2001 8:00 am

RE: Name This AE...303

Post by juliet7bravo »

Have to wonder why the IJA didn't build assault guns ala the Stug, or more SPGs.  Would have "fit" with their mindset and doctrine, and been cheap conversions.  A tankette hull mounting one of their little 70mm infantry support guns and an MG would have been useful.  Ditto a HA GO with a 75mm pack howitzer.  Stug type assault gun built on a HA GO chassis with a high velocity 47mm, very, very useful. 
Post Reply

Return to “War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945”