Page 1 of 1
better than MOO3?
Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2005 10:22 am
by cato13
if it is whats better about it?
RE: better than MOO3?
Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2005 11:17 am
by elmo3
Matrix won't drop it like the scumbags at Atari dropped MOO3. [:-]
RE: better than MOO3?
Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2005 11:53 am
by Terl
It is much, much different than MOO3 in its concept and play style. It is a great deal of fun to play and is easy to pick up. I have been playing this game before it came to Matrix.
I would recommend you go to the developer's page and give the demo he has a try so you can see the play style for yourself. It is nowhere as tedious as MOO3.
RE: better than MOO3?
Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2005 2:35 pm
by elcidce
If you do get the demo just remember the demo is not even close to the current version as far as graphics and refinement of the gameplay are concerned. I strongly recommend the game to anyone. I have been playing it for about 2yrs now and have stopped playing many other games since I began playing this. Im still learning new strategies and there is still patching being done to improve its play.
RE: better than MOO3?
Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2006 1:40 pm
by ian77
Ahhh.. but is it better than MOO2?
Ian
RE: better than MOO3?
Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2006 4:33 pm
by Erik Rutins
It's different from MOO2. MOO2 to me is more like playing Babylon 5, wherease STUN v3 is more like playing Star Trek. I can't put it much more succinctly. STUN is a more intimate game with fewer ships, more exploration, etc. I can say this, I think everyone who liked MOO2 would like STUN.
Regards,
- Erik