Page 1 of 1
Equipment count discrepancies?
Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 7:45 pm
by Lieste
Viewing the AAR for tut #1, I notice that several of the German 'general' tabs indicate more guns than are present in the E&S screen.
For example the sole survivors at 18:01 D2 are elements of I.54 FlaK coy:
Gen tab:
37 pers
10 non-AFV
1 gun
E&S tab:
10 3t truck
34 KAR 98
2 MP40
1 MG34
The 13th IG coy Inf Regt 433 also tends to show one more tube in the summary than is present in E&S at D2 18:01. The mortars and AT batteries seem to show the same values in both places.
RE: Equipment count discrepancies?
Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 8:26 pm
by Arjuna
Are these enemy intel reports or friendly units?
RE: Equipment count discrepancies?
Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 11:18 pm
by Lieste
Yes, but the 'actual' state at the end of play. The values of E&S and summary should still match though, even if the unit is misidentified, and equipment holdings are incomplete, I would have thought?
RE: Equipment count discrepancies?
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 10:53 pm
by Lieste
More -
There seems to be a possible error with the number of eliminated guns also - A recent scenario had 38 'guns' in the German force, which after 36 hours was down to only a single 8cm mortar. The loss reported was 36 guns though - perhaps this missing gun was in a disbanded unit and was culled as there was no other system of this type in the receiving unit? If so this makes sense, from a functional POV, but it is unintentionally misleading and is incomplete (even after the elimination of FOW in the AAR).
Worse, I found that during the AAR I am unable to return to a correct version of a saved game - sometimes this is due to the elimination of all on-map units (either by friendly exit, or by destruction of enemy forces) in both cases the saved game cannot be reloaded even though the scenario is in the AAR/endgame state. However, more troubling is the apparent disappearance of a number of units (6 out of 10 in the recent AAR) that were in poor morale and IMO near surrender as they were within the footprint of my assaulting Brigade - none of the killed units were clickable, and these 6 OPFOR units were not present on the AAR review map. They were of course present (and/or functional) during AAR review immediately following the conclusion of the mission, and the fault only relates to returning to analyse the aftermath.
RE: Equipment count discrepancies?
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 11:28 pm
by Prince of Eckmühl
ORIGINAL: Lieste
Yes, but the 'actual' state at the end of play. The values of E&S and summary should still match though, even if the unit is misidentified, and equipment holdings are incomplete, I would have thought?
Are you examining your forces are those of the AI?
RE: Equipment count discrepancies?
Posted: Mon Mar 01, 2010 12:46 am
by Lieste
Well, both.
However the errors probably only arise in the
actual full-intel strengths of the enemy forces. The absence of entire enemy units from the subsequently loaded scenario is double-plus-ungood though... I suspect it is only arising in the AAR/mission end state saves, but it would be
very serious if it could arise elsewhen.
Look at the end state image:
The four units within the extended footprint of my brigade are not present when this AAR is reloaded for a second look - 3.433, 5.433, 6.433, 7.433 (427 men)
(Also possibly 8.433 Mor Pl, but I am unsure off the top of my head whether this is culled - 17 men, 1 8cm mortar)
The original end-state had six units within this "Rhodista quadrilateral" which vanished on a second inspection so the end-state of the AAR had to use a second run from within the last hour to obtain the consistent AAR and unit-state images.
While mentioning units not visible in the end-state, it would be really nice to have access in the AAR to the General and E&S for units that successfully advanced or withdrew from the map, both for player and AI units. Currently they appear to be culled from the OB and only get a
brief mention as 'own-side' APERS/ARM/BOMB points exited for the victory location.
RE: Equipment count discrepancies?
Posted: Mon Mar 01, 2010 1:40 am
by Lieste
I do of course concede that yes isn't a productive answer to an either/or question <doh!>
I can only blame an extended bout of flu/chest infections lack of adequate sleep and the resulting sluggishness of thought...