Page 1 of 1

Terrain readability is a major regression

Posted: Sun Apr 13, 2025 5:06 pm
by delor
Just wanted to point this out here. Here's a chunk of the Fulda Gap in Armored Brigade 1:
ab1.jpg
ab1.jpg (514.03 KiB) Viewed 594 times
Here's the same in Armored Brigade 2:
ab2.jpg
ab2.jpg (509.88 KiB) Viewed 594 times
The removal of the elevation shading in Armored Brigade 2 is an enormous regression to reading the elevation map relative to Armored Brigade 1, and trying to figure out your lines of sight was already a huge pain point in the first game.

The 3D nature of the terrain doesn't help make it apparent because of how small the elevation shifts are relative to the area of play, and the fact that you do most play looking down at relatively steep angles doesn't help matters. Additional visual cues like the slope shading in AB1 are still incredibly necessary to make a map readable.

Re: Terrain readability is a major regression

Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2025 7:59 pm
by bairdlander2
Another reason I will not be getting AB2

Re: Terrain readability is a major regression

Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2025 6:22 pm
by DBeves
/But you have 3d now - what you need "Shading" for ? Seriously some people are never happy with anything

Re: Terrain readability is a major regression

Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2025 12:00 pm
by samspackman
Here is the same map in 3D
2025-04-29 21_48_42-Armored Brigade II.png
2025-04-29 21_48_42-Armored Brigade II.png (1.06 MiB) Viewed 223 times
Here is the same map with height map
2025-04-29 21_49_29-Armored Brigade II.png
2025-04-29 21_49_29-Armored Brigade II.png (752.48 KiB) Viewed 223 times
Here is the same map with LOS
2025-04-29 21_50_20-Armored Brigade II.png
2025-04-29 21_50_20-Armored Brigade II.png (631.62 KiB) Viewed 223 times
One thing you are not short of in AB2 is knowledge of elevations.