7.1 is good but...

joegamer · Post by **joegamer** » Sat Mar 30, 2002 7:57 am

The 7.1 patch is a little weak with a few irritations of its own. Why does the clear dark hexes button make all the hexes dark? Are the dates for the infantry AT weapons accurate? There were no Panzerfaust 60s in the Normandy campaign? In general I think they are more accurate but has their rarity gone too far? What do you other gamers think?

tracer · Post by **tracer** » Sat Mar 30, 2002 8:05 am

Originally posted by joegamer
Why does the clear dark hexes button make all the hexes dark?

I just tested this and on the map I selected the opposite occurred: all hexes became lightened. I think this can be adjusted in the preferences screen using the 'move radius' button.

joegamer · Post by **joegamer** » Sat Mar 30, 2002 8:22 am

Hey tracer you're right. I toggled the move radius preference off and the clear dark hexes button is now behaving itself. Thanx.

parusski · Post by **parusski** » Sat Mar 30, 2002 8:57 am

7.1 one is good for one reason: they did it for is. End of the damned discussionl. Be thankfull everyone.

tracer · Post by **tracer** » Sat Mar 30, 2002 10:24 am

Originally posted by joegamer
Hey tracer you're right.

My wife said that happens once in a while

Warrior2 · Post by **Warrior2** » Sat Mar 30, 2002 10:30 am

Originally posted by joegamer
The 7.1 patch is a little weak with a few irritations of its own. Why does the clear dark hexes button make all the hexes dark? Are the dates for the infantry AT weapons accurate? There were no Panzerfaust 60s in the Normandy campaign? In general I think they are more accurate but has their rarity gone too far? What do you other gamers think?

Just how many other SPWaW versions have you played, Newbie, to decide 7.1 is "weak?"

chief · Post by **chief** » Sat Mar 30, 2002 11:55 am

Hey warrior, don't be too hard on him, in WW2 they had 90 day wonders in the field, he may be 2 post wonder....now behave:D

:rolleyes:

peter hellman · Post by **peter hellman** » Sat Mar 30, 2002 3:01 pm

I do understand Warrior here. When enjoying this (FREE) game as much as I do, when there is some comment, maybe as now with a real issue, but like carelessly thrown out of the hat with the point against Matrix, it slightly raises the aggression level.

Misunderstand me right here, I'm not saying no one should criticize anything. The approach is important.

hnh3_sp · Post by **hnh3_sp** » Sat Mar 30, 2002 6:25 pm

Of course, you might actually try answering his questions instead of attacking him...:rolleyes:

Les_the_Sarge_9_1 · Post by **Les_the_Sarge_9_1** » Sat Mar 30, 2002 6:43 pm

Warrior? are you THE warrior?

I looked and you have just 36 posts?

Are you the WARRIOR I am thinkng of?

I was sure you would have more than 36 posts????

Just confused here this is about nothing really, it just attracted my attention.

Supervisor · Post by **Supervisor** » Sat Mar 30, 2002 7:51 pm

Yes Sarge: He is the one and only Warrior, he had to revert back to his old name for some reason that escapes me. Administrator's posted early when the forum was put in motion that some user names that hadn't been in use for a while lost the proper total post count. But he is the original.

tracer · Post by **tracer** » Sat Mar 30, 2002 8:08 pm

To me he'll always be REMF

joegamer · Post by **joegamer** » Sat Mar 30, 2002 9:51 pm

I fondly remember playing ver 2.2 years ago. Have designed and published a few WW2 miniatures rules. I still enjoy SPWAW its just that when I see a bn. of infantry firing HEAT rifle grenades against armor in 1941 it surprises me. I feel every incremental patch in SPWAW is a net improvement and am appreciative for the effort that goes into creating it. So naah!

Warrior2 · Post by **Warrior2** » Sat Mar 30, 2002 11:33 pm

Originally posted by tracer
To me he'll always be REMF

Thanks Jim! That's me, all right, safe in the rear with the gear!

Figmo · Post by **Figmo** » Sun Mar 31, 2002 8:07 am

I've played every version of the Steel Pathers series and SPWaW Ver. 7.1 is the best of all - IMHO!!

It won't make everybody happy - that will never happen - but for me it's the best.

Figmo

ruxius · Post by **ruxius** » Sun Mar 31, 2002 8:08 am

PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE ADministrator...,
Give back to Warrior his previous amount of posts !!...
I can't still believe to what I read :
Warrior : Matrix New Recruit...!

KG Erwin · Post by **KG Erwin** » Sun Mar 31, 2002 8:52 am

Agreed! Warrior needs to be upgraded to at least a veteran. <Ahem> rank DOES have its privileges.

Les_the_Sarge_9_1 · Post by **Les_the_Sarge_9_1** » Sun Mar 31, 2002 9:04 am

Warrior knows, as do I, that his promotion is a matter of simply adjusting his rank through the interface.

Alas I dont think they can restore that nice looking sum of posts that must be his due.

KG Erwin · Post by **KG Erwin** » Sun Mar 31, 2002 9:06 am

As has been mentioned earlier, any suggested OOB changes and file attachments should be posted to Colonel Von Blitz's New 7.1 OOBS.

Warrior · Post by **Warrior** » Sun Mar 31, 2002 9:11 am

Well guys, I decided to take the path of least resistance. To keep the history of my posts I've reverted to REMF, but as you can see have added "aka WARRIOR," lest anyone think I'm really an armchair General sitting in the rear echleon.

It's not the most elegant solution, but does get the job done. (Though I kind of miss being a "Matrix Hero!")

7.1 is good but...

7.1 is good but...

Re: 7.1 is good but...

Re: 7.1 is good but...

newbie, newby, booby