Admirals Edition Naval Thread

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

Post Reply
User avatar
jwilkerson
Posts: 8126
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2002 4:02 am
Location: Kansas
Contact:

RE: Admirals Edition Naval Thread

Post by jwilkerson »

ORIGINAL: Terminus

ORIGINAL: Brady

1) Will PT's now have to be suported by a deicated unit or tender or do they operate the same as before. Is this true for midgets as well,that is do they require a speciality base force or a tender?

2) Are captured ships now in the game?

3) Are Russian Naval assests represented? (Tie Navy?)

1) That's still being worked on.

2) Not planned for the AE release.

3) No.

The Naval OOB team is a sub-team of the Naval Team and includes Tankerace, JWE, jwilkerson and Terminus. Per Justin's earlier decision I am not including any captured ships in the IJN warship OOB (otherwise we run risk of having hundreds of ships running around with two incarnations). And as to the Soviets, I know we haven't worked on it yet, but I do know there has been some interest, so even if it doesn't make the initial release, I wouldn't rule it out forever.
But as to the omission of captured ships in the IJN OOB, we are also adding many ships that were not included in stock, so the net/net is probably at least a detectable increase in number of hulls.
WITP Admiral's Edition - Project Lead
War In Spain - Project Lead
User avatar
bobogoboom
Posts: 3799
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 7:02 pm
Location: Dallas

RE: Admirals Edition Naval Thread

Post by bobogoboom »

wow now we know why you haven't been spamming the thread like normal[:D]
I feel like I'm Han Solo, and you're Chewie, and she's Ben Kenobi, and we're in that bar.
Member Texas Thread Mafia.
Image
Sig art by rogueusmc
User avatar
SargeantTex
Posts: 420
Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2005 8:29 am

RE: Admirals Edition Naval Thread

Post by SargeantTex »

Will the Midway Class CVs be included?
User avatar
Terminus
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: Admirals Edition Naval Thread

Post by Terminus »

I'm not sure at the moment. OOB is still being built, and it's a bigg'un! Won't promise what I don't know.
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
User avatar
Jim D Burns
Posts: 3997
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2002 6:00 pm
Location: Salida, CA.

RE: Admirals Edition Naval Thread

Post by Jim D Burns »

Do the allies still have to lose 4 CV's to get the four hulls that were renamed in the honor of lost CV's?

Jim
User avatar
Terminus
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: Admirals Edition Naval Thread

Post by Terminus »

ORIGINAL: Jim D Burns

Do the allies still have to lose 4 CV's to get the four hulls that were renamed in the honor of lost CV's?

Jim

That's a respawn issue, and as said previously, respawn is now something that can be turned off. At the moment, we're looking at a respawn scenario for the master grand campaign, but it's still a way's off until release.
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
User avatar
Brady
Posts: 6084
Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2002 12:48 pm
Location: Oregon,USA

RE: Admirals Edition Naval Thread

Post by Brady »

COOL, so we might see some of the Japanese Army ships and sub's?
 
 With this new smaller hex size are we going to see some representation of the Japanese woden hulled merchant marine, I know the shear size of this fleat is stagerining in terms of hulls but most front line bases were suplied in part from these ships, particularly the larger ones, to barge hubs.
 
  Also if so modeled, or represented, will the vast woden hulled ship building industry be represented in some way? Their were woden hulled ship building yards all over the far east.
Image


SCW Beta Support Team

Beta Team Member for:

WPO
PC
CF
AE
WiTE

Obi-wan Kenobi said it best: A lot of the reality we perceive depend on our point of view
User avatar
Terminus
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: Admirals Edition Naval Thread

Post by Terminus »

ORIGINAL: Brady

COOL, so we might see some of the Japanese Army ships and sub's?

With this new smaller hex size are we going to see some representation of the Japanese woden hulled merchant marine, I know the shear size of this fleat is stagerining in terms of hulls but most front line bases were suplied in part from these ships, particularly the larger ones, to barge hubs.

Also if so modeled, or represented, will the vast woden hulled ship building industry be represented in some way? Their were woden hulled ship building yards all over the far east.

There will be some of the Army types, yes. As you said, however, the Jap "water taxis" are simply too numerous and too poorly detailed in sources, plus we decided that the return on investment would be too low. So no...
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
whippleofd
Posts: 617
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2005 1:40 am

RE: Admirals Edition Naval Thread

Post by whippleofd »

2. Pretty simply. Every port has a maximum tonnage capacity, and anything beyond that can only anchor there.


SWEETNESS!

Whipple
MMCS(SW/AW) 1981-2001
1981 RTC, SD
81-82 NPS, Orlando
82-85 NPTU, Idaho Falls
85-90 USS Truxtun (CGN-35)
90-93 USS George Washington (CVN-73)
93-96 NFAS Orlando
96-01 Navsea-08/Naval Reactors
User avatar
Jim D Burns
Posts: 3997
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2002 6:00 pm
Location: Salida, CA.

RE: Admirals Edition Naval Thread

Post by Jim D Burns »

ORIGINAL: Terminus
That's a respawn issue, and as said previously, respawn is now something that can be turned off. At the moment, we're looking at a respawn scenario for the master grand campaign, but it's still a way's off until release.

Sorry Terminus, I guess I should have been a bit clearer. My question is are the Essex class hulls that were historically already under construction and then renamed when current CV’s were sunk a part of the grand campaign scenario as their own ship, or do they only appear as respawns as in the current stock campaign?

Jim
User avatar
Apollo11
Posts: 25237
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Zagreb, Croatia
Contact:

RE: Admirals Edition Naval Thread

Post by Apollo11 »

Hi all,

Just a quick starting question... [:D]


Was anything done with PTs?

I am asking this because, as evident in many late war WitP AARs, the USN PTs are really "scourge" for IJN DDs and CLs...

Thanks in advance!


Leo "Apollo11"
Image

Prior Preparation & Planning Prevents Pathetically Poor Performance!

A & B: WitW, WitE, WbtS, GGWaW, GGWaW2-AWD, HttR, CotA, BftB, CF
P: UV, WitP, WitP-AE
User avatar
Terminus
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: Admirals Edition Naval Thread

Post by Terminus »

At the moment, the situation for the Grand Campaign is unchanged, with regards to the 4 carriers in question.
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
User avatar
Mike Solli
Posts: 16078
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku

RE: Admirals Edition Naval Thread

Post by Mike Solli »

ORIGINAL: Whipple

2. Pretty simply. Every port has a maximum tonnage capacity, and anything beyond that can only anchor there.


SWEETNESS!

Whipple

Does the maximum tonnage capacity increase as the port size is increased?
Image
Created by the amazing Dixie
User avatar
Terminus
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: Admirals Edition Naval Thread

Post by Terminus »

ORIGINAL: Apollo11

Hi all,

Just a quick starting question... [:D]


Was anything done with PTs?

I am asking this because, as evident in many late war WitP AARs, the USN PTs are really "scourge" for IJN DDs and CLs...

Thanks in advance!


Leo "Apollo11"

Work is being done on them...
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
User avatar
Brady
Posts: 6084
Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2002 12:48 pm
Location: Oregon,USA

RE: Admirals Edition Naval Thread

Post by Brady »

Kaiten's?
Image


SCW Beta Support Team

Beta Team Member for:

WPO
PC
CF
AE
WiTE

Obi-wan Kenobi said it best: A lot of the reality we perceive depend on our point of view
User avatar
Terminus
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: Admirals Edition Naval Thread

Post by Terminus »

ORIGINAL: Mike Solli

ORIGINAL: Whipple

2. Pretty simply. Every port has a maximum tonnage capacity, and anything beyond that can only anchor there.


SWEETNESS!

Whipple

Does the maximum tonnage capacity increase as the port size is increased?

Capacity is dependent on port size, so yeah...
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
User avatar
treespider
Posts: 5781
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 7:34 am
Location: Edgewater, MD

RE: Admirals Edition Naval Thread

Post by treespider »

Was the variable load capacity for units worked out?
 
IE troops in different modes will occupy differing amounts of cargo space thus requiring greater or less transport capacity depending on mode? 
Here's a link to:
Treespider's Grand Campaign of DBB

"It is not the critic who counts, .... The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena..." T. Roosevelt, Paris, 1910
User avatar
Terminus
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: Admirals Edition Naval Thread

Post by Terminus »

ORIGINAL: treespider

Was the variable load capacity for units worked out?

IE troops in different modes will occupy differing amounts of cargo space thus requiring greater or less transport capacity depending on mode?

It's being worked on.
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
User avatar
Chad Harrison
Posts: 1384
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2003 9:07 pm
Location: Boise, ID - USA

RE: Admirals Edition Naval Thread

Post by Chad Harrison »

How effective will AK's be in transporting troops now? Will they have a limit to how many troops they can have onboard as opposed to equipment?
 
In other words, will a large AK only be able to support say 200 people in addition to its crew and the rest of the space can only be taken up by cargo?
pmelheck1
Posts: 615
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2003 12:04 pm
Location: Alabama

RE: Admirals Edition Naval Thread

Post by pmelheck1 »

1.  One the one screen shot you show two types of damage.  Will normal damage repair faster or is major damage just an indicator of where the ship must repair.
 
2.  With engine damage will towing be modeled or is the 1 hex rule still in effect.
 
3.  Can other ships in a fleet assist a striken capital ship with fire fighting / flood control,  I.E. distroyer pulling alongside a damaged CV.
 
 
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”