Moved to another Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108p3 updated 10 July

Post bug reports and ask for help with other issues here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
Bullwinkle58
Posts: 11297
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 12:47 pm

RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108k9 updated 24 April

Post by Bullwinkle58 »

ORIGINAL: michaelm

Maybe I'll change one VP everytime a player uses it.[:D]

Still worth it.
The Moose
User avatar
BigDuke66
Posts: 2035
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Terra

RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108k9 updated 24 April

Post by BigDuke66 »

Shouldn't a TF that is not docked in a base hex be listed as "At sea in XY"?
I see some of my Mine sweeping and ASW TFs listed as At sea but even more just list the base as if they were docked but I can't see the difference between them.

Is the Burma Road checked daily?
Using "5" I can trace a path to Rangoon from Tsuyung but I still don't see a "Burma Road Open".

I would like to attach a save but all I get is:

C:\fakepath\wpae004.rar is not supported

Ok changed extention to txt, that did it.
Attachments
wpae004.txt
(2.43 MiB) Downloaded 10 times
ADB123
Posts: 1559
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2009 10:56 pm

RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108k9 updated 24 April

Post by ADB123 »

Michael -

In PzB's AAR Cap & Gown wrote the following:
I imagine you are still using the last patch. I wanted to give you a heads up about the beta patch. My opponent asked that I upgrade to the newest beta and I did. I found some very important changes for the Japanese side. First, you can now build PT boats (MTBs). That could be good for point defense of forward bases. I just turned on MTB production in a big way. The other extremely important change is that every Zero squadron can now upgrade to Georges and Jacks! I had relegated my Zero squadrons to rear area defenses and training. But now it looks like those squadrons will be useful again once I can get enough planes built. (I had to expand my production quite a bit since I was not expecting to be able use that many Georges and Jacks.)

I've looked through your updated list on the first page of this discussion and I can't seem to be able to find where you state these changes.

My JFB side says "oh boy" for my Japanese pbem. [:D]

My AFB side says "huh, what do the Allies get in return?" for my Allied pbem. [X(]

Thanks - [:)]
User avatar
DivePac88
Posts: 3119
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2008 9:50 pm
Location: Somewhere in the South Pacific.

RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108k9 updated 24 April

Post by DivePac88 »

I've read-up on this beta patch, and it looks stable to me. I want to upgrade our PBEM game, can anyone see a problem with that?
Image
When you see the Southern Cross, For the first time
You understand now, Why you came this way
User avatar
michaelm75au
Posts: 12463
Joined: Sat May 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108j (build03)

Post by michaelm75au »

ORIGINAL: inqistor

So what exactly does:
Fixed Error in some calculations of MP and ARM points for squad-type devices in some places [MEM]
mean? Is now cost for devices closer to 1 Armament Point for 1 load point, as stated in manual?

In some places the ARM points were number of devices times device's load cost.
For squad like devices, it should be ARM points equal to number of devices.

The first method is the cost to build a non-vehicle non-squad device.
Michael
User avatar
michaelm75au
Posts: 12463
Joined: Sat May 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108k9 updated 24 April

Post by michaelm75au »

ORIGINAL: BigDuke66

Is the Burma Road checked daily?
Using "5" I can trace a path to Rangoon from Tsuyung but I still don't see a "Burma Road Open".

Yes daily.
The length of the 'Burma Road' supply is more than the 100 points that '5' key shows, so it can't be used to tell.

Oh and more importantly, the message is in the next build. The one that hasn't been posted yet.[:D]
Michael
User avatar
michaelm75au
Posts: 12463
Joined: Sat May 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108k9 updated 24 April

Post by michaelm75au »

ORIGINAL: ADB123

Michael -

In PzB's AAR Cap & Gown wrote the following:
I imagine you are still using the last patch. I wanted to give you a heads up about the beta patch. My opponent asked that I upgrade to the newest beta and I did. I found some very important changes for the Japanese side. First, you can now build PT boats (MTBs). That could be good for point defense of forward bases. I just turned on MTB production in a big way. The other extremely important change is that every Zero squadron can now upgrade to Georges and Jacks! I had relegated my Zero squadrons to rear area defenses and training. But now it looks like those squadrons will be useful again once I can get enough planes built. (I had to expand my production quite a bit since I was not expecting to be able use that many Georges and Jacks.)

I've looked through your updated list on the first page of this discussion and I can't seem to be able to find where you state these changes.

My JFB side says "oh boy" for my Japanese pbem. [:D]

My AFB side says "huh, what do the Allies get in return?" for my Allied pbem. [X(]

Thanks - [:)]
The MTBs was a bug. Building the ships use to get stuck on one day delay or 16 days or such. So switching to the beta often dumps a load of queued 'supply for ships' into the game.
Upgrade of the Zero has nothing to do with the code. That is controlled by the group upgrade paths. However,if you play with user-upgrade, then all bets are basically off.[:D]
Michael
User avatar
BigDuke66
Posts: 2035
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Terra

RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108k9 updated 24 April

Post by BigDuke66 »

ORIGINAL: michaelm

ORIGINAL: BigDuke66

Is the Burma Road checked daily?
Using "5" I can trace a path to Rangoon from Tsuyung but I still don't see a "Burma Road Open".

Yes daily.
The length of the 'Burma Road' supply is more than the 100 points that '5' key shows, so it can't be used to tell.

Oh and more importantly, the message is in the next build. The one that hasn't been posted yet.[:D]

Well I guess that could explain it.
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108k9 updated 24 April

Post by witpqs »

ORIGINAL: michaelm
ORIGINAL: ADB123

Michael -

In PzB's AAR Cap & Gown wrote the following:
I imagine you are still using the last patch. I wanted to give you a heads up about the beta patch. My opponent asked that I upgrade to the newest beta and I did. I found some very important changes for the Japanese side. First, you can now build PT boats (MTBs). That could be good for point defense of forward bases. I just turned on MTB production in a big way. The other extremely important change is that every Zero squadron can now upgrade to Georges and Jacks! I had relegated my Zero squadrons to rear area defenses and training. But now it looks like those squadrons will be useful again once I can get enough planes built. (I had to expand my production quite a bit since I was not expecting to be able use that many Georges and Jacks.)

I've looked through your updated list on the first page of this discussion and I can't seem to be able to find where you state these changes.

My JFB side says "oh boy" for my Japanese pbem. [:D]

My AFB side says "huh, what do the Allies get in return?" for my Allied pbem. [X(]

Thanks - [:)]
The MTBs was a bug. Building the ships use to get stuck on one day delay or 16 days or such. So switching to the beta often dumps a load of queued 'supply for ships' into the game.
Upgrade of the Zero has nothing to do with the code. That is controlled by the group upgrade paths. However,if you play with user-upgrade, then all bets are basically off.[:D]

I'm cap_and_gown's opponent. I had no idea that his Zero squadrons were restricted before. Maybe that was a bug and it's now gone? Dunno.
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108k9 updated 24 April

Post by witpqs »

ORIGINAL: DivePac88

I've read-up on this beta patch, and it looks stable to me. I want to upgrade our PBEM game, can anyone see a problem with that?

All total I've played about a bit short of 2 months of turns in PBM with the Beta. I felt confident enough in it to recommend that we upgrade to another PBM opponent ina game that we have up to end of February 1944. Never any guarantees of course, but I say go for it!
User avatar
Major SNAFU_M
Posts: 585
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 4:36 pm

RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108k9 updated 24 April

Post by Major SNAFU_M »

Hi Michael,

I have been playing with the last 4 or 5 versions of the beta and first I want to say great stuff and thanks.

With the latest k9 I am seeing something I haven't seen with AE up until K9 (I installed K8, but never had a chance to play until K9 came out and I don't recall seeing this with K7.

Anyway, the game now always wants to be in the upper left-hand of my monitor.  If I drag the game window to the middle of the monitor, when it updates a screen it draws a large white box beginning at the upper, left-hand side of the screen bounds buy the lower, right-hand corner of the current position of the game window.  This white area may or may no blink a few times and then the game window jumps to the upper, left-hand corner of the screen.

I don't see this with stock, nor with earlier versions of the K series.

I haven' made any changes to the computer in the last few days, so I wanted to report this.

thanks,
"Popular Opinion? What I suggest you do with 'Popular Opinion' is biologically impossible and morally questionable." -

"One ping to find them all,
One ping to link them;
One ping to promote them all,
and in the darkness sink them"
User avatar
CaptBeefheart
Posts: 2617
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2003 2:42 am
Location: Seoul, Korea

RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108k9 updated 24 April

Post by CaptBeefheart »

Michael: Small thing that I think is an old problem, but I noticed Combat Engineer '43 devices can't be paradropped (i.e. too big for a C-47). No biggie if it doesn't get fixed and I don't know what the proper solution would be, but since you're fixing so many other things...

EDIT: Just to be clear, some para units have these combat engineers and they stay behind in a fragment.

Cheers,
CC
Beer, because barley makes lousy bread.
User avatar
DivePac88
Posts: 3119
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2008 9:50 pm
Location: Somewhere in the South Pacific.

RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108k9 updated 24 April

Post by DivePac88 »

ORIGINAL: witpqs
ORIGINAL: DivePac88

I've read-up on this beta patch, and it looks stable to me. I want to upgrade our PBEM game, can anyone see a problem with that?

All total I've played about a bit short of 2 months of turns in PBM with the Beta. I felt confident enough in it to recommend that we upgrade to another PBM opponent ina game that we have up to end of February 1944. Never any guarantees of course, but I say go for it!

Thank you witpqs for your answer, I had suspected this beta was stable, and now you have reassured me. So I will now go with this Patch for our new PBEM. [:)]
Image
When you see the Southern Cross, For the first time
You understand now, Why you came this way
User avatar
ny59giants
Posts: 9902
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 12:02 pm

RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108k9 updated 24 April

Post by ny59giants »

I have the Beta installed in three games and find it very stable. Yes, there may be a minor glitch here and there, but Michaelm usually has it fixed by the next version. He has been putting them out about every weekend for the last month plus. Thanks Michael!! [&o][&o]

I have John 3rd convinced to install it for his game, but he needs to sell it for his opponent. While talking with him and showing him some of the features, I learned how to left click on destroyed ground units and then exit that window to see how many PP it would cost to get that unit to be available for rebuilding.
[center]Image[/center]
User avatar
Bullwinkle58
Posts: 11297
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 12:47 pm

RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108k9 updated 24 April

Post by Bullwinkle58 »

ORIGINAL: Major SNAFU

Hi Michael,

I have been playing with the last 4 or 5 versions of the beta and first I want to say great stuff and thanks.

With the latest k9 I am seeing something I haven't seen with AE up until K9 (I installed K8, but never had a chance to play until K9 came out and I don't recall seeing this with K7.

Anyway, the game now always wants to be in the upper left-hand of my monitor.  If I drag the game window to the middle of the monitor, when it updates a screen it draws a large white box beginning at the upper, left-hand side of the screen bounds buy the lower, right-hand corner of the current position of the game window.  This white area may or may no blink a few times and then the game window jumps to the upper, left-hand corner of the screen.

I don't see this with stock, nor with earlier versions of the K series.

I haven' made any changes to the computer in the last few days, so I wanted to report this.

thanks,

Did you remember to copy your switches over to the new shortcut? I forgot to once.
The Moose
User avatar
Major SNAFU_M
Posts: 585
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 4:36 pm

RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108k9 updated 24 April

Post by Major SNAFU_M »

Bullwinkle58:

That was a great idea, but for the fact that I haven't modified any switches (yet).  I want to start playing around with the resolution settings, but with so many other things to learn about AE, I didn't open that particular can of worms. 

The only switch is the -w, but that is set up by the patch installer and has been there on all of the patches I have used.

Thanks,
"Popular Opinion? What I suggest you do with 'Popular Opinion' is biologically impossible and morally questionable." -

"One ping to find them all,
One ping to link them;
One ping to promote them all,
and in the darkness sink them"
User avatar
PaxMondo
Posts: 10851
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 3:23 pm

Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108k9 - Replacement Pilots

Post by PaxMondo »

Replacement Pilots

So got suspicious about the replacement pilot pool, so I setup a test.  Modded so that I could pull a LOT of pilots. 

First I pulled all of the pilots out of the pool.  Ran a turn.  Then I pulled another +300 IJN pilots into training squadrons.  No change in pool numbers.  Ran the turn to see if any change.  None.

This picture is the from after the +300 pull, but the "before" screen is identical except that it is the 15 Jan 42.

Image

Shouldn't the number of pilots have dropped? looks like I'm getting free pilots here ....

I ran this in K7, K8, and K9.

Michael: savegame available, but if you still have one of the saves I've sent you with a game date of before ~20Jan you can run this test. Look at Hiroshima squadrons and just fill them up. If you need another save, just let me know.
Attachments
110429 replace pilot.jpg
110429 replace pilot.jpg (25.47 KiB) Viewed 277 times
Pax
User avatar
Bullwinkle58
Posts: 11297
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 12:47 pm

RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108k9 updated 24 April

Post by Bullwinkle58 »

ORIGINAL: Major SNAFU

Bullwinkle58:

That was a great idea, but for the fact that I haven't modified any switches (yet).  I want to start playing around with the resolution settings, but with so many other things to learn about AE, I didn't open that particular can of worms. 

The only switch is the -w, but that is set up by the patch installer and has been there on all of the patches I have used.

Thanks,

Well, it was a shot.

FWIW, you may want to try the -altFont switch if you have eyes older than 21-YO. I've used it since early WITP and it reduces strain markedly for me. Doesn't play with resolutions or any of the other complex switchology topics like multi-cores. It just makes every screen easier.
The Moose
User avatar
PaxMondo
Posts: 10851
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 3:23 pm

RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108k9 updated 24 April

Post by PaxMondo »

ORIGINAL: witpqs

I'm cap_and_gown's opponent. I had no idea that his Zero squadrons were restricted before. Maybe that was a bug and it's now gone? Dunno.
Witpqs,

I don't think so. In stock, the George is NOT a carrier capable aircraft so AFAIK it cannot be used in a "zero" squadron. What I have done in my personal mod (and I have read many others doing the same) to enable this upgrade is to mod the George so that it is carrier capable and then add a house rule that states the George can only be transported by CV, not operated off of them. I haven't read any other solution in the forums ...
Pax
User avatar
michaelm75au
Posts: 12463
Joined: Sat May 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108k9 updated 24 April

Post by michaelm75au »

ORIGINAL: Major SNAFU

Hi Michael,

I have been playing with the last 4 or 5 versions of the beta and first I want to say great stuff and thanks.

With the latest k9 I am seeing something I haven't seen with AE up until K9 (I installed K8, but never had a chance to play until K9 came out and I don't recall seeing this with K7.

Anyway, the game now always wants to be in the upper left-hand of my monitor.  If I drag the game window to the middle of the monitor, when it updates a screen it draws a large white box beginning at the upper, left-hand side of the screen bounds buy the lower, right-hand corner of the current position of the game window.  This white area may or may no blink a few times and then the game window jumps to the upper, left-hand corner of the screen.

I don't see this with stock, nor with earlier versions of the K series.

I haven' made any changes to the computer in the last few days, so I wanted to report this.

thanks,
Don't know what would becausing that. It would be a directx thing, but nothing has been changed in that area for zonks.
My game shows in the middle when playing normal window mode.
I noticed a large Windows update come in recently. I remenber we had trouble with some things last lime Microsoft did a big update on us.
Michael
Post Reply

Return to “Tech Support”