Yeah I thought there were more of them than five, I can't see how they'd work in Command either.ORIGINAL: emsoy
Thanks! But if I understood correctly the helicopter might be outside Command's scope? Better put it in the 'Will add if requested by a scenario designer' category and add later, if needed?
Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues
Moderator: MOD_Command
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues
-
FlyingBear
- Posts: 133
- Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2014 12:32 am
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues
[ADDED GENERIC UNIT, DB v440]
It would but I am not having much success.
For PRP-1, a.k.a Kopac:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kop%C3%A1%C4%8D_passive_sensor
Not much useful there, except that it left the Czech army in 1979 (I know, wrong db
). No word on when it left USSR.
http://www.manfred-bischoff.de/PRP-1_KOPAC.pdf
Brief, but gives the Czech entry date as 1963 and indicates that there are four emitter locator vans, three of one type and one of a different type (my German is a tad rusty and we did not cover correlation detection terminology in any detail in my high school German classes).
http://www.airpowerstudies.co.uk/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderfiles/aprvol5no2.pdf
Fairly long article, a lot about general capabilities of these systems.
"##Jiøí Hofman, Jan Bauer: Tajemství radiotechnického pátraèe Tamara [The Secret of Radiotechnical Sensor Tamara], 2003, ISBN 80-86645-02-9, in Czech language"
Haven't found it and would not understand a word if I did.
The more I think about it though the more I think the generic ELINT vehicle I asked for is probably good enough. I doubt even information on obsolete systems of this type from open sources would be accurate, and the things we do know (such as them mainly targeting TACAN and IFF rather than radars) do not seem to be in the scope of Command's SIGINT modeling at the moment.
ORIGINAL: emsoy
Would be great if you could try to dig up some info on the PRP-1 and SDR-02 systems. Need info on in-service date, general capabilities, the number of emitter locators per system, etc.
Thanks!
It would but I am not having much success.
For PRP-1, a.k.a Kopac:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kop%C3%A1%C4%8D_passive_sensor
Not much useful there, except that it left the Czech army in 1979 (I know, wrong db
http://www.manfred-bischoff.de/PRP-1_KOPAC.pdf
Brief, but gives the Czech entry date as 1963 and indicates that there are four emitter locator vans, three of one type and one of a different type (my German is a tad rusty and we did not cover correlation detection terminology in any detail in my high school German classes).
http://www.airpowerstudies.co.uk/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderfiles/aprvol5no2.pdf
Fairly long article, a lot about general capabilities of these systems.
"##Jiøí Hofman, Jan Bauer: Tajemství radiotechnického pátraèe Tamara [The Secret of Radiotechnical Sensor Tamara], 2003, ISBN 80-86645-02-9, in Czech language"
Haven't found it and would not understand a word if I did.
The more I think about it though the more I think the generic ELINT vehicle I asked for is probably good enough. I doubt even information on obsolete systems of this type from open sources would be accurate, and the things we do know (such as them mainly targeting TACAN and IFF rather than radars) do not seem to be in the scope of Command's SIGINT modeling at the moment.
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues
Some questions for the experts out there:
- Did the NK SSG missile launch actually happen or was it just a propaganda stunt? If it did happen, what's the most up-to-date stats?
- Anyone got a photo of the new Derby ER variant?
- What is the current status on the DF-41 development / deployment?
Thanks!
- Did the NK SSG missile launch actually happen or was it just a propaganda stunt? If it did happen, what's the most up-to-date stats?
- Anyone got a photo of the new Derby ER variant?
- What is the current status on the DF-41 development / deployment?
Thanks!

Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues
Can't seem to dig up a photo of Derby ER, but it uses the same body as the Derby. Only differences are in seeker, motor, and software. Having the same body, all aircraft certified for the Derby can immediately carry the Derby ER (physically that is, not sure about software).
I'll go through some DF-21 stuff later that I've been meaning to read.
I'll go through some DF-21 stuff later that I've been meaning to read.
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues
One addition that would be really useful...
Defender-class 25-foot boat
They built 800 (!) of these...they've been exported all around the world. They'll probably show up in places for the next 50 years. (Maybe classify the nationality as "Generic" rather than USCG?)
There are three sub-types. I have tried to track down as much technical information as I could. Fortunately, the Coast Guard, which uses them extensively, has quite a bit of information about them.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defender-class_boat
http://www.safeboats.com/boats/full-cabin-25/
http://www.uscg.mil/datasheet/25rbs.asp
http://www.uscg.mil/INTERNATIONAL/25ft.asp
Defender-class boat (Class A)
Displacement: 2.7 ton
Length: 8.9 m (29 ft 2 in) (A Class) 9 m (29 ft 6 in) (B Class)
Beam: 2.6 m (8 ft 6 in)
Draught: 0.98 m (3 ft 3 in)
Propulsion: 2 × Honda 4-stroke outboard engines, 225 hp (168 kW) each
Speed: 46 knots (53 mph; 85 km/h) maximum
35 knots (40 mph; 65 km/h) cruising
Range: 175 nmi (324 km) (A Class) 150 nmi (280 km) (B Class)
Complement: 4 crew, 6 passengers
Armament: 1-2 × M240B (A and B Class) 1 × M2HB, 2 × M240B (C Class) <-- one of the Wikipedia images shows the machine guns as being mounted on the bow and on the stern; on the C-class, in another image, the .50 appears to be mounted on the bow and the two .30 machine guns are mounted at the rear, one pointing port and one pointing starboard
---Wikipedia
And, according to the Coast Guard:
Physical Characteristics:
Length, molded: 25' 00"
Length Overall: (bow to taff rail) 27' 6"
Beam (amidships): 8' 6"
Freeboard, bow: 3' 5"
Freeboard, Amidships pilothouse door): 2' 00"
Freeboard, recovery well: 1' 0"
Draft (engines lowered): 3' 3"
Draft (engines raised): 2' 3"
Maximum Fixed height above water line: (top of spotlight): 6' 9"
Fixed Height above waterline: (top of mast light) 9' 2"
Unfixed height above water line: (top of VHF antenna): 11' 0"
Engines Qty (2) Honda 4-Stroke Counter-rotating Shaft horsepower (each engine): 225 SHP
Operational Characteristics:
Speed: 40+ Knots
Cruising Range:175NM at 35 knots
Seas: Up to 4' for normal operations
Safe in seas 8-10'photo of 25 foot Bridge
Fuel type: gasoline
Fuel capacity: 105 gallons
Maximum speed: 45 kts
Displacement, full load: 8,500 pounds
Displacement, less cargo: 7,200 pounds
Minimum Operational Crew: 3
Personnel Capacity (Pass. and Crew): 10
Weather Parameters: Winds: 25 kt & Seas: 6 feet
Crew Endurance: 8 hours
Towing Capacity: 35' or 10 Tons
Electronic Systems:
Furuno 1933C 10.4 inch Color Radar and Chart Plotter <-- I don't know if this is just a generic navigation radar or a surface search radar
GP-37 DGPS Receiver
RD-30 Remote Display (displays DGPS, Depth, Water temperature and Heading)
PG-1000 Flux Gate Compass Transducer
ARC Remote Control Searchlight
Boat Outfit:
2 Fire Extinguishers
1 Boat Hook
150 ft Anchor/Tow Rope
1 Anchor
6 - 25 ft. Mooring Lines
1 Bucket w/Lanyard
1 Manual Portable Bilge Pump
1 First Aid Kit
Boat Manuals
Defender-class Boat (Class B)
Similar to the Class A, but “it has a slightly longer cabin [length is 9 m. instead of 8.9 m for Class A], additional spotter windows aft, shock mitigating cabin seats, a smaller 105 gallon fuel tank, and various other minor changes. It is the most common of the three classes.”
Range: 150 miles at 35 knots
Defender-class Boat (Class C)
Same as Class B, except “an increased armament of one M2HB .50-caliber machine gun on a modified forward mount and two M240B machine guns on port and starboard mounts just aft of the cabin.” –Wikipedia
Thanks for considering this one.
Defender-class 25-foot boat
They built 800 (!) of these...they've been exported all around the world. They'll probably show up in places for the next 50 years. (Maybe classify the nationality as "Generic" rather than USCG?)
There are three sub-types. I have tried to track down as much technical information as I could. Fortunately, the Coast Guard, which uses them extensively, has quite a bit of information about them.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defender-class_boat
http://www.safeboats.com/boats/full-cabin-25/
http://www.uscg.mil/datasheet/25rbs.asp
http://www.uscg.mil/INTERNATIONAL/25ft.asp
Defender-class boat (Class A)
Displacement: 2.7 ton
Length: 8.9 m (29 ft 2 in) (A Class) 9 m (29 ft 6 in) (B Class)
Beam: 2.6 m (8 ft 6 in)
Draught: 0.98 m (3 ft 3 in)
Propulsion: 2 × Honda 4-stroke outboard engines, 225 hp (168 kW) each
Speed: 46 knots (53 mph; 85 km/h) maximum
35 knots (40 mph; 65 km/h) cruising
Range: 175 nmi (324 km) (A Class) 150 nmi (280 km) (B Class)
Complement: 4 crew, 6 passengers
Armament: 1-2 × M240B (A and B Class) 1 × M2HB, 2 × M240B (C Class) <-- one of the Wikipedia images shows the machine guns as being mounted on the bow and on the stern; on the C-class, in another image, the .50 appears to be mounted on the bow and the two .30 machine guns are mounted at the rear, one pointing port and one pointing starboard
---Wikipedia
And, according to the Coast Guard:
Physical Characteristics:
Length, molded: 25' 00"
Length Overall: (bow to taff rail) 27' 6"
Beam (amidships): 8' 6"
Freeboard, bow: 3' 5"
Freeboard, Amidships pilothouse door): 2' 00"
Freeboard, recovery well: 1' 0"
Draft (engines lowered): 3' 3"
Draft (engines raised): 2' 3"
Maximum Fixed height above water line: (top of spotlight): 6' 9"
Fixed Height above waterline: (top of mast light) 9' 2"
Unfixed height above water line: (top of VHF antenna): 11' 0"
Engines Qty (2) Honda 4-Stroke Counter-rotating Shaft horsepower (each engine): 225 SHP
Operational Characteristics:
Speed: 40+ Knots
Cruising Range:175NM at 35 knots
Seas: Up to 4' for normal operations
Safe in seas 8-10'photo of 25 foot Bridge
Fuel type: gasoline
Fuel capacity: 105 gallons
Maximum speed: 45 kts
Displacement, full load: 8,500 pounds
Displacement, less cargo: 7,200 pounds
Minimum Operational Crew: 3
Personnel Capacity (Pass. and Crew): 10
Weather Parameters: Winds: 25 kt & Seas: 6 feet
Crew Endurance: 8 hours
Towing Capacity: 35' or 10 Tons
Electronic Systems:
Furuno 1933C 10.4 inch Color Radar and Chart Plotter <-- I don't know if this is just a generic navigation radar or a surface search radar
GP-37 DGPS Receiver
RD-30 Remote Display (displays DGPS, Depth, Water temperature and Heading)
PG-1000 Flux Gate Compass Transducer
ARC Remote Control Searchlight
Boat Outfit:
2 Fire Extinguishers
1 Boat Hook
150 ft Anchor/Tow Rope
1 Anchor
6 - 25 ft. Mooring Lines
1 Bucket w/Lanyard
1 Manual Portable Bilge Pump
1 First Aid Kit
Boat Manuals
Defender-class Boat (Class B)
Similar to the Class A, but “it has a slightly longer cabin [length is 9 m. instead of 8.9 m for Class A], additional spotter windows aft, shock mitigating cabin seats, a smaller 105 gallon fuel tank, and various other minor changes. It is the most common of the three classes.”
Range: 150 miles at 35 knots
Defender-class Boat (Class C)
Same as Class B, except “an increased armament of one M2HB .50-caliber machine gun on a modified forward mount and two M240B machine guns on port and starboard mounts just aft of the cabin.” –Wikipedia
Thanks for considering this one.
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues
ORIGINAL: FlyingBear
It would but I am not having much success.
For PRP-1, a.k.a Kopac:
Thanks for the links, but you're right there's not an awful lot to go on. So added generic units [8D]

Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues
They use those Defender boats all over Africa, too.
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues
[ALREADY ADDED DB v439]
I'd like to suggest the Sea Lance. It was meant to be a replacement for SUBROC and may've actually deployed had the Cold War continued into the 1990s. I've noticed you've added a few weapons from that area that never quite made it so this might be a good one. The nuclear version (there was a torpedo version too) was going to have a 200kt warhead! [8D][:D]
Sadly, the only photo I've found was in Wikipedia in it's capsule. It was also apparently planned to be launched from VLS cells on surface ships.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UUM-125_Sea_Lance
http://www.designation-systems.net/dusrm/m-125.html
I'd like to suggest the Sea Lance. It was meant to be a replacement for SUBROC and may've actually deployed had the Cold War continued into the 1990s. I've noticed you've added a few weapons from that area that never quite made it so this might be a good one. The nuclear version (there was a torpedo version too) was going to have a 200kt warhead! [8D][:D]
Sadly, the only photo I've found was in Wikipedia in it's capsule. It was also apparently planned to be launched from VLS cells on surface ships.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UUM-125_Sea_Lance
http://www.designation-systems.net/dusrm/m-125.html
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues
ORIGINAL: Tarawa565
Can't seem to dig up a photo of Derby ER, but it uses the same body as the Derby. Only differences are in seeker, motor, and software. Having the same body, all aircraft certified for the Derby can immediately carry the Derby ER (physically that is, not sure about software).
I'll go through some DF-21 stuff later that I've been meaning to read.
Thanks [8D]

Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues
ORIGINAL: hellfish6
They use those Defender boats all over Africa, too.
Wonder how many scens would use this one. if we added it lol [8D]

Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues
ORIGINAL: Rob322
I'd like to suggest the Sea Lance. It was meant to be a replacement for SUBROC and may've actually deployed had the Cold War continued into the 1990s. I've noticed you've added a few weapons from that area that never quite made it so this might be a good one. The nuclear version (there was a torpedo version too) was going to have a 200kt warhead! [8D][:D]
Sadly, the only photo I've found was in Wikipedia in it's capsule. It was also apparently planned to be launched from VLS cells on surface ships.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UUM-125_Sea_Lance
http://www.designation-systems.net/dusrm/m-125.html
Added this one in v439 [8D]

Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues
[ADDED DB v440]
Hello. Here are two units I have noticed to be missing from the database:
HH-60W Pave Hawk
The HH-60W Pave Hawk is a replacement of all the current HH-60 Pave Hawk helicopters in United States Air Force service. The HH-60W is designed to be a combat search and rescue helicopter variant of the UH-60M.
UH-72 Lakota
The UH-72 Lakota helicopter is missing from the DB3000 database. The UH-72 is designed to replace the UH-1H/V and OH-58A/C aircraft in the United States Army (National Guard and active duty). The first aircraft was delivered in 2006 to the US Army. As of May 14, 2014, over 300 aircraft have been made. The UH-72A is in service and will be upgraded to the UH-72B starting in 2017. As of 2015, Thailand is the only export customer, with 6 units ordered and another 9 requested. The UH-72 can carry 9 troops and has 1-2 pilots.
Hello. Here are two units I have noticed to be missing from the database:
HH-60W Pave Hawk
The HH-60W Pave Hawk is a replacement of all the current HH-60 Pave Hawk helicopters in United States Air Force service. The HH-60W is designed to be a combat search and rescue helicopter variant of the UH-60M.
UH-72 Lakota
The UH-72 Lakota helicopter is missing from the DB3000 database. The UH-72 is designed to replace the UH-1H/V and OH-58A/C aircraft in the United States Army (National Guard and active duty). The first aircraft was delivered in 2006 to the US Army. As of May 14, 2014, over 300 aircraft have been made. The UH-72A is in service and will be upgraded to the UH-72B starting in 2017. As of 2015, Thailand is the only export customer, with 6 units ordered and another 9 requested. The UH-72 can carry 9 troops and has 1-2 pilots.
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues
Excellent, must've missed it!
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues
[NO INFORMATION ON OPERATIONAL STATUS OF CONV VERSION]
Both the SS-N-21a and SS-N-21b have a nuclear warhead. Shouldn't 1 of them have a 410 kg HE warhead?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RK-55
http://missilethreat.com/missiles/rk-55-ss-n-21ssc-x-4/
http://fas.org/nuke/guide/russia/bomber/as-15.htm
Both the SS-N-21a and SS-N-21b have a nuclear warhead. Shouldn't 1 of them have a 410 kg HE warhead?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RK-55
http://missilethreat.com/missiles/rk-55-ss-n-21ssc-x-4/
http://fas.org/nuke/guide/russia/bomber/as-15.htm
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues
[ADDED DB v440]
#1608 - MQ-1B Armed Predator UAV -- United States (Army), 2001-0, -
This predator can be armed with stingers, as seen in this video: /watch?v=tAneAliAG88 (can't post links yet, but that should be all you need to add on youtube, if not, just search "predator shoots at MiG-25").
I cannot find any photos of a predator armed with stingers, but I would guess that there is 1 per pylon, so 2 overall. So maybe the loadout would be 2x Stinger?
From Wikipedia:
MQ-1A Predator: Early airframes capable of carrying ordnance (AGM-114 Hellfire ATGM or AIM-92 Stinger). Nose-mounted AN/ZPQ-1 Synthetic Aperture Radar removed.
An Iraqi MiG-25 shot down a Predator performing reconnaissance over the no fly zone in Iraq on 23 December 2002. This was the first time in history a conventional aircraft and a drone had engaged each other in combat. Predators had been armed with AIM-92 Stinger air-to-air missiles, and were being used to "bait" Iraqi fighters, then run. In this incident, the Predator did not run, but instead fired one of its Stingers. The Stinger's heat-seeker became "distracted" by the MiG's missile and missed the MiG. The Predator was hit by the MiG's missile and destroyed.
#1608 - MQ-1B Armed Predator UAV -- United States (Army), 2001-0, -
This predator can be armed with stingers, as seen in this video: /watch?v=tAneAliAG88 (can't post links yet, but that should be all you need to add on youtube, if not, just search "predator shoots at MiG-25").
I cannot find any photos of a predator armed with stingers, but I would guess that there is 1 per pylon, so 2 overall. So maybe the loadout would be 2x Stinger?
From Wikipedia:
MQ-1A Predator: Early airframes capable of carrying ordnance (AGM-114 Hellfire ATGM or AIM-92 Stinger). Nose-mounted AN/ZPQ-1 Synthetic Aperture Radar removed.
An Iraqi MiG-25 shot down a Predator performing reconnaissance over the no fly zone in Iraq on 23 December 2002. This was the first time in history a conventional aircraft and a drone had engaged each other in combat. Predators had been armed with AIM-92 Stinger air-to-air missiles, and were being used to "bait" Iraqi fighters, then run. In this incident, the Predator did not run, but instead fired one of its Stingers. The Stinger's heat-seeker became "distracted" by the MiG's missile and missed the MiG. The Predator was hit by the MiG's missile and destroyed.
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues
[FIXED DB v440]
I still think some of the passive sonar signatures are not accurate. From what I've read and from prior posts the FREMM is built to be quiet including anti-vibration devices and electric drive. Yet it's acoustic signature remains relatively high. Especially considering the RKR Moskva is a much larger ship and (although only a guess but I'm almost sure is true) was not built with similar acoustic signature reduction techniques, and yet it's passive sonar signature is less that the FREMM. Thanks in for looking into this.
I still think some of the passive sonar signatures are not accurate. From what I've read and from prior posts the FREMM is built to be quiet including anti-vibration devices and electric drive. Yet it's acoustic signature remains relatively high. Especially considering the RKR Moskva is a much larger ship and (although only a guess but I'm almost sure is true) was not built with similar acoustic signature reduction techniques, and yet it's passive sonar signature is less that the FREMM. Thanks in for looking into this.
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues
[PARTLY ADDED DB v440]
Hi again, just a short list of missing UK units. Most are already in-game with other countries.
RAF
Britten-Norman Islander, in service as 'Islander BN2T CC Mk2', used for photographic reconnaissance and light communications. Outfit unknown.
Super King Air B200 and B200T used as an advanced multi-engine trainer for student pilots.
(Short) Tucano T1 is a basic lead-in fast-jet training aircraft.
Agusta A109E used for VIP transport. Only one in service.
Griffin HAR2, based on the Bell 412EP and based in Cyprus for SAR roles.
Royal Navy Fleet Air Arm (aircraft)
Avenger T1, based on the Super King Air 300 military, is used for navigator training.
3x Scan Eagle, but I think I've mentioned it before.
Army Air Corps
Defender AL-2. Used C2, communications, reconnaissance and photographics roles. Equipped with DAS and an EO pod under the nose. Based on the Britten-Norman Defender 4000. One Defender T3 (trainer) also in use but it's probably not much use in CMANO.
Lynx AH9A. There is a Lynx AH9 in game however all of these were upgraded to AH9A standard. Uses the LHTEC CTS800-4N (1,362 shp) engines, the same as the Wildcat so that it had commonality with them.
There's also the Bell Griffin HT1 and Eurocopter AS350 Squirrel HT1 training aircraft that equip RAF/AAC squadrons but are contractor owned.
Royal Navy (ships)
P 257 Clyde (modified River Class batch 1 PB) is missing. This has been in service for a few years and patrols the Falklands. Has a 30mm DS30B and strengthened deck for flight operations, supporting the weight of a Merlin helicopter.
Forth class (River Class batch 2). 3x ships (Forth, Medway, Trent) similar to the Brazilian Amazonas class with Merlin-capable flight deck, 30mm DS30B, Kelvin Hughes SharpEye nav radar and Terma 4103 2D naval air & surface surveillance radar.
Army (land)
Warrior 40mm. The current Warriors are receiving an upgrade to the 40mm CTA from their 30mm Rardens. Includes new EO sights and comms.
And that's about it.
Hi again, just a short list of missing UK units. Most are already in-game with other countries.
RAF
Britten-Norman Islander, in service as 'Islander BN2T CC Mk2', used for photographic reconnaissance and light communications. Outfit unknown.
Super King Air B200 and B200T used as an advanced multi-engine trainer for student pilots.
(Short) Tucano T1 is a basic lead-in fast-jet training aircraft.
Agusta A109E used for VIP transport. Only one in service.
Griffin HAR2, based on the Bell 412EP and based in Cyprus for SAR roles.
Royal Navy Fleet Air Arm (aircraft)
Avenger T1, based on the Super King Air 300 military, is used for navigator training.
3x Scan Eagle, but I think I've mentioned it before.
Army Air Corps
Defender AL-2. Used C2, communications, reconnaissance and photographics roles. Equipped with DAS and an EO pod under the nose. Based on the Britten-Norman Defender 4000. One Defender T3 (trainer) also in use but it's probably not much use in CMANO.
Lynx AH9A. There is a Lynx AH9 in game however all of these were upgraded to AH9A standard. Uses the LHTEC CTS800-4N (1,362 shp) engines, the same as the Wildcat so that it had commonality with them.
There's also the Bell Griffin HT1 and Eurocopter AS350 Squirrel HT1 training aircraft that equip RAF/AAC squadrons but are contractor owned.
Royal Navy (ships)
P 257 Clyde (modified River Class batch 1 PB) is missing. This has been in service for a few years and patrols the Falklands. Has a 30mm DS30B and strengthened deck for flight operations, supporting the weight of a Merlin helicopter.
Forth class (River Class batch 2). 3x ships (Forth, Medway, Trent) similar to the Brazilian Amazonas class with Merlin-capable flight deck, 30mm DS30B, Kelvin Hughes SharpEye nav radar and Terma 4103 2D naval air & surface surveillance radar.
Army (land)
Warrior 40mm. The current Warriors are receiving an upgrade to the 40mm CTA from their 30mm Rardens. Includes new EO sights and comms.
And that's about it.
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues
[ADDED DB v440]
specially for emsoy
Su-25SM with L-150 (aka Su-25SM2) use Kh-58U against target in 105km:
launch:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b9HblmwgC2s
Kh-58U hit target (0:23):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dap8dDMv568
So it seems Russian Su-25SM with L-150 not only capable but actually use Kh-58U ARM in training
So maybe ARM should be added to armament of Su-25 with L-150(Su-25SM2) and Su-25SM3 [:)]
specially for emsoy
Su-25SM with L-150 (aka Su-25SM2) use Kh-58U against target in 105km:
launch:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b9HblmwgC2s
Kh-58U hit target (0:23):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dap8dDMv568
So it seems Russian Su-25SM with L-150 not only capable but actually use Kh-58U ARM in training
So maybe ARM should be added to armament of Su-25 with L-150(Su-25SM2) and Su-25SM3 [:)]
-
gabravo2005
- Posts: 38
- Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2013 3:36 am
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues
ORIGINAL: emsoy
- Anyone got a photo of the new Derby ER variant?
Thanks!
http://defense-update.com/20150220_i-derby.html#.VaMDffm6fmg
Only pic I could dig up was at this link, I guess it's called the I-DERBY?
*EDIT*
Found another
http://www.defence24.com/media/cache/slide/uploads/images/064d78a89692b1aebac68388ed3b4175.jpg
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues
[FIXED DB v440]
The Mig-35D is listed as in the russian navy but is not carrier capable in the database. Should it be carrier capable? thanks
The Mig-35D is listed as in the russian navy but is not carrier capable in the database. Should it be carrier capable? thanks

