Infantry Smoke?

Tigers on the Hunt is a World War 2 hard-core tactical wargame for PC.

It creates a truly and immersive depth tactical simulation. Tigers on the Hunt boasts a ferocious and adaptive AI which will dynamically respond to a player’s maneuvers.

Moderators: Paullus, Peter Fisla

Post Reply
User avatar
blackcloud6
Posts: 643
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2002 4:46 am

Infantry Smoke?

Post by blackcloud6 »

I cannot find in the manual anything on infantry smoke grenades. Is this a possible add-on in the future? It would be nice to have this.
User avatar
Peter Fisla
Posts: 2574
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Canada

RE: Infantry Smoke?

Post by Peter Fisla »

ORIGINAL: blackcloud6

I cannot find in the manual anything on infantry smoke grenades. Is this a possible add-on in the future? It would be nice to have this.

Infantry smoke it is not in the game and it will not be added into the game as in WW2 smoke was primarily used for singaling purposes.
User avatar
mainsworthy
Posts: 735
Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2013 7:05 pm
Contact:

RE: Infantry Smoke?

Post by mainsworthy »

ORIGINAL: Peter Fisla

ORIGINAL: blackcloud6

I cannot find in the manual anything on infantry smoke grenades. Is this a possible add-on in the future? It would be nice to have this.

Infantry smoke it is not in the game and it will not be added into the game as in WW2 smoke was primarily used for singaling purposes.

Peter I would of thought this was easy to pop an invisible hinderance in a hex, just a bushes tile but invisible, and maybe fired with Guns, you just choose smoke like the AP or HE you already have
https://hiphopy.itch.io/

check when you can, I put diff stuff on now and then
User avatar
blackcloud6
Posts: 643
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2002 4:46 am

RE: Infantry Smoke?

Post by blackcloud6 »

Infantry smoke it is not in the game and it will not be added into the game as in WW2 smoke was primarily used for singaling purposes.

OK, but the US did have the WP smoke grenade for screening purposes and they did exist in other armies, although much less likely. This is a major departure from ASL.

Maybe add it as a support weapon but state in the manual that it should be used sparingly in scenario design?

I do agree that it may not have been as common as some games make it (Steel Panthers comes to mind) but it was there, especially with the US Army and USMC.
Perelandra67
Posts: 41
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2015 11:21 am

RE: Infantry Smoke?

Post by Perelandra67 »

ORIGINAL: Peter Fisla

ORIGINAL: blackcloud6

I cannot find in the manual anything on infantry smoke grenades. Is this a possible add-on in the future? It would be nice to have this.

Infantry smoke it is not in the game and it will not be added into the game as in WW2 smoke was primarily used for singaling purposes.


what information do you base this decision on? I have a different understanding of smoke in WW2, but I do respect your WW2 knowledge and would like to understand your reasoning for that statement.
"Amateurs study tactics; professionals study logistics."
siddious
Posts: 37
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2011 2:02 pm

RE: Infantry Smoke?

Post by siddious »

Dont let them bully you peter if you have made that decision then stick to it, after all we CANT have everyone harrassing you for a change here there and evrey bloddy where.

The game will not get off the ground if you pamper to everyones little whims.I see nothing wrong with suggestions but its your game remmember.
Gerry4321
Posts: 889
Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2003 2:40 am

RE: Infantry Smoke?

Post by Gerry4321 »

It's not actually just Peter's game - we paid money for it so I take exception to your problem of people debating gaming issues. Such debate on forums is very important for a game to keep improving and I certainly hope to see future releases. So long as people are polite I think people should always give their 2c.
User avatar
blackcloud6
Posts: 643
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2002 4:46 am

RE: Infantry Smoke?

Post by blackcloud6 »

Dont let them bully you peter...

No one is bullying Peter. I asked a question and got an answer. It may not be one I fully agree with, so be it. Apparently others have the same question too.

I like this game so far. But there are some features, or lack there of that I wonder why they were done the way they were done. So I'm going to ask.
siddious
Posts: 37
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2011 2:02 pm

RE: Infantry Smoke?

Post by siddious »

So i cant debate then,my last post then.
User avatar
blackcloud6
Posts: 643
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2002 4:46 am

RE: Infantry Smoke?

Post by blackcloud6 »

So i cant debate then,my last post then.

Certainly you can debate. But that is not what you did, you accused us of "bullying." Debate the issue. You could have said "I agree with Peter that infantry smoke was hardly used for screening in WWII and thus it does not belong in the game." That would have been a response I appreciated. I may have then asked for your sources.

Frankly, this is an issue I'm not firm on. Infantry smoke grenades for screening purposed did exist in WWII and many armies had them. But their actual and availability use is another issue. I just got a response on another forum that says that use of such for screening by the Germans was a "best practice" in Stalingrad. The poster then cited a book source that has a translated german document stating such.
Gerry4321
Posts: 889
Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2003 2:40 am

RE: Infantry Smoke?

Post by Gerry4321 »

I would like to see infantry smoke added in as in for the Germans. Smaller probability of course as in ASL. But a computer game could do it differently as in allocate x grenades to a squad/platoon and then account for their use.
User avatar
blackcloud6
Posts: 643
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2002 4:46 am

RE: Infantry Smoke?

Post by blackcloud6 »

Here's some information but point more to doctrine than showing actual use. These two show the Germans had a smoke grenade, but it appears they considered it of limited use and value.

http://www.lonesentry.com/articles/ttt0 ... smoke.html

http://www.lonesentry.com/articles/ttt/ ... ctics.html
MikeMarchant_ssl
Posts: 80
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 9:36 am

RE: Infantry Smoke?

Post by MikeMarchant_ssl »

That's fascinating, Blackcloud, thanks for sharing that with us.


Best Wishes

Mike
User avatar
blackcloud6
Posts: 643
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2002 4:46 am

RE: Infantry Smoke?

Post by blackcloud6 »

That's fascinating, Blackcloud, thanks for sharing that with us.

You are welcome but I can't take credit. I got those from a response to a post I made over on the Armchair General forums.
User avatar
blackcloud6
Posts: 643
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2002 4:46 am

RE: Infantry Smoke?

Post by blackcloud6 »

I just had this posted on my Consimworld blog:


From Small Unit Actions during the German Campaign in Russia

Assault Engineers with smoke:

"Organizational weapons and equipment of the platoon included one extra flame thrower, demolition charges, detonators with time fuzes, friction-type fuze lighters, a tool kit, binding wire, tow ropes, hand grenades, smoke cylinders, machinegun ammunition, and one electric mine detector."

"Each individual was issued two smoke cylinders"

"When the 3d Platoon squad set up a smokescreen ..."

"The Germans on the opposite bank hurled smoke grenades, which, aided by a favorable northeast wind, enshrouded both tanks in such dense smoke that their machinegun and cannon fire overshot their mark."

"After blasting open the exhaust vents, they dropped hand grenades and smoke cylinders into the openings."

Regular Infantry:

For marking "A Junkers 88 bomber and a Henschel 126 reconnaissance plane were standing by at the Alakurti airfield ready to airdrop supplies and evacuate wounded in the event of an emergency. They were to be contacted by radio and guided to their target area by smoke signals from the ground."

Russian Infantry: "An unusual amount of smoke grenades was used by the Russians during the preparation fire." Could be mortars.

Cursory search of a single publication.




Post Reply

Return to “Tigers on the Hunt”