The Good The Bad & The Indifferent
Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition
- Canoerebel
- Posts: 21099
- Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2002 11:21 pm
- Location: Northwestern Georgia, USA
- Contact:
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent
At first blush that seems to be the case. But it wouldn't work that way. This has been thought through and discussed at length previously, but I'll put it forth again.
Any direct LOC from Hawaii to the west would have fairly narrow shoulders subject to raids by enemy combat ships or carriers. It would be necessary to provide protection for any convoys using that route. I just demonstrated this two months back, when a large convoy moved directly to Luzon from the Marshalls. It was a tight go and required Death Star to shepherd it part way, and it had a sizeable carrier escort of its own.
The route I'm currently using is far more secure. And since it was long ago set up, it's also efficient. Supply runs with negligible risk all the way to Boela. From there to Luzon is a bit dicey and requires attention from my carriers, but big deal. That means once every two or three months Death Star handles a brief security operation.
I could have chosen an LOC route and broadened its shoulders, but that would have taken a lot of time and I'd be far back from where I am now. I chose to move deep and fast and narrow, putting my air force within strike range. Trade offs, but I have no doubt that this course of action - including the current LOC arrangement - was far better than any alternatives.
Any direct LOC from Hawaii to the west would have fairly narrow shoulders subject to raids by enemy combat ships or carriers. It would be necessary to provide protection for any convoys using that route. I just demonstrated this two months back, when a large convoy moved directly to Luzon from the Marshalls. It was a tight go and required Death Star to shepherd it part way, and it had a sizeable carrier escort of its own.
The route I'm currently using is far more secure. And since it was long ago set up, it's also efficient. Supply runs with negligible risk all the way to Boela. From there to Luzon is a bit dicey and requires attention from my carriers, but big deal. That means once every two or three months Death Star handles a brief security operation.
I could have chosen an LOC route and broadened its shoulders, but that would have taken a lot of time and I'd be far back from where I am now. I chose to move deep and fast and narrow, putting my air force within strike range. Trade offs, but I have no doubt that this course of action - including the current LOC arrangement - was far better than any alternatives.
"Rats set fire to Mr. Cooper’s store in Fort Valley. No damage done." Columbus (Ga) Enquirer-Sun, October 2, 1880.
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent
Maybe you should take some very-long range cargo ships (Liberty or Victory come to mind but maybe Victory on account of their speed) filled only with supply and send them west from Hawaii to inside of John's detection range, then pull them back and route them the usual way. [:D]
Intel Monkey: https://sites.google.com/view/staffmonkeys/home
- Canoerebel
- Posts: 21099
- Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2002 11:21 pm
- Location: Northwestern Georgia, USA
- Contact:
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent
Interesting info via nav search and SigInt that bears the LOC to Oz issue.
There's an enemy combat TF at Tagula Island, east of Milne Bay. This may be a raiding TF or it might be a fast transport TF. SigInt reported a base force inbound to Tagula.
That's noteworthy, because John's withdrawing from nearly all of his perimeter and hasn't done anything in this vicinity in so long that the roosters stopped crowing. This, combined with the recent combat TF raid on Luganville and the not-so-long ago sighting of a carrier TF leaving the Marianas on a SE heading, are like turning on the light and seeing a cockroach on the counter. Odds are that's not the only one.
John may be planning to interdict the Allied LOC where it crosses the Coral Sea or approaches the Torres Strait. And he may also plan to hit the empties that just reached the DEI.
Neither thing is gonna happen, for reasons I won't go into. It's fun, though, trying to figure out what he might do and taking countermeasures (but, in this case, the countermeasures have been in place for so long that even the buzzards have stopped buzzing).
There's an enemy combat TF at Tagula Island, east of Milne Bay. This may be a raiding TF or it might be a fast transport TF. SigInt reported a base force inbound to Tagula.
That's noteworthy, because John's withdrawing from nearly all of his perimeter and hasn't done anything in this vicinity in so long that the roosters stopped crowing. This, combined with the recent combat TF raid on Luganville and the not-so-long ago sighting of a carrier TF leaving the Marianas on a SE heading, are like turning on the light and seeing a cockroach on the counter. Odds are that's not the only one.
John may be planning to interdict the Allied LOC where it crosses the Coral Sea or approaches the Torres Strait. And he may also plan to hit the empties that just reached the DEI.
Neither thing is gonna happen, for reasons I won't go into. It's fun, though, trying to figure out what he might do and taking countermeasures (but, in this case, the countermeasures have been in place for so long that even the buzzards have stopped buzzing).
"Rats set fire to Mr. Cooper’s store in Fort Valley. No damage done." Columbus (Ga) Enquirer-Sun, October 2, 1880.
- JohnDillworth
- Posts: 3104
- Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 5:22 pm
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent
BTW, what are your doing with your transport aircraft? If you get abundant supply in China you can start to fly it into Formosa
Today I come bearing an olive branch in one hand, and the freedom fighter's gun in the other. Do not let the olive branch fall from my hand. I repeat, do not let the olive branch fall from my hand. - Yasser Arafat Speech to UN General Assembly
- Canoerebel
- Posts: 21099
- Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2002 11:21 pm
- Location: Northwestern Georgia, USA
- Contact:
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent
Lots of activity is ongoing in John's AAR. Until today, I thought he was working a plan for a big attack in the Formosa region. And he might be. But now I think it more likely that he's chewing over the Allied LOC and possibilities for interdicting Allied supply. Of course, those of you reading John's AAR will know if I way off base. But I like to think out loud because I suppose that would be most interesting to the reader.
We've already been through this scenario once before. The Allied LOC was narrowest at the approach to the Torres Strait. John held the New Guinea bases, including Port Moresby. And then he posted KB near Milne Bay. In reaction, I had to carefully tend my convoys. Mainly, though, I simply diverted them south, unloaded at protected ports like Sydney, let the supply move overland to Normanton on the Gulf of Carpentaria, and those ships then moved to Boela.
The situation at present is better than it was then. Firstly, I have PM now. Secondly, my DEI bases have a stockpile of 600k+ supply, which is the reserve for China/Formosa. Third, China/Formosa will very soon be able to handle local security without DS, so that my carriers can go elsewhere if needed. And fourth, there is a reasonable chance that a new injection of supply won't be need for months - at least two, maybe four.
John and I drew even in the score on August 2, 1944. In slightly more than four months since then, the Allied lead has grown to 30k. By the end of December, the Allies should be at least half way to auto victory.
In other words, it will have taken five months to make it half way to victory. At that pace, the war would draw to a close at the end of May.
But the pace of Allied scoring has increased dramatically since mid September, with a brief hiatus the past week or so to await supply. I think the pace will pick up considerably over coming months.
Since August one, I've brought in two injections of supply totaling about 550k. That was sufficient to handle all the air and ground ops from further back. Now I'm bringing in 1 million plus supply to airfields that are further forward and to an army that has already pummeled the enemy in China.
It's possible it doubling the victory point spread will take double the time (another five months), but I doubt it. I think the projection of victory in February, March or April is on target.
And I do think that incoming supply (assuming it makes it) could possibly fund operations - at least in the air - until the war ends. As for ground ops in China, there's a pretty good chance Rangoon will provide that supply.
We've already been through this scenario once before. The Allied LOC was narrowest at the approach to the Torres Strait. John held the New Guinea bases, including Port Moresby. And then he posted KB near Milne Bay. In reaction, I had to carefully tend my convoys. Mainly, though, I simply diverted them south, unloaded at protected ports like Sydney, let the supply move overland to Normanton on the Gulf of Carpentaria, and those ships then moved to Boela.
The situation at present is better than it was then. Firstly, I have PM now. Secondly, my DEI bases have a stockpile of 600k+ supply, which is the reserve for China/Formosa. Third, China/Formosa will very soon be able to handle local security without DS, so that my carriers can go elsewhere if needed. And fourth, there is a reasonable chance that a new injection of supply won't be need for months - at least two, maybe four.
John and I drew even in the score on August 2, 1944. In slightly more than four months since then, the Allied lead has grown to 30k. By the end of December, the Allies should be at least half way to auto victory.
In other words, it will have taken five months to make it half way to victory. At that pace, the war would draw to a close at the end of May.
But the pace of Allied scoring has increased dramatically since mid September, with a brief hiatus the past week or so to await supply. I think the pace will pick up considerably over coming months.
Since August one, I've brought in two injections of supply totaling about 550k. That was sufficient to handle all the air and ground ops from further back. Now I'm bringing in 1 million plus supply to airfields that are further forward and to an army that has already pummeled the enemy in China.
It's possible it doubling the victory point spread will take double the time (another five months), but I doubt it. I think the projection of victory in February, March or April is on target.
And I do think that incoming supply (assuming it makes it) could possibly fund operations - at least in the air - until the war ends. As for ground ops in China, there's a pretty good chance Rangoon will provide that supply.
"Rats set fire to Mr. Cooper’s store in Fort Valley. No damage done." Columbus (Ga) Enquirer-Sun, October 2, 1880.
- Canoerebel
- Posts: 21099
- Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2002 11:21 pm
- Location: Northwestern Georgia, USA
- Contact:
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent
12/4/44
Coral Sea and the LOC:

Coral Sea and the LOC:

- Attachments
-
- 120544CoralSea.jpg (731.51 KiB) Viewed 358 times
"Rats set fire to Mr. Cooper’s store in Fort Valley. No damage done." Columbus (Ga) Enquirer-Sun, October 2, 1880.
- Canoerebel
- Posts: 21099
- Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2002 11:21 pm
- Location: Northwestern Georgia, USA
- Contact:
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent
Current supply in Oz: 1.625 million.
Current supply in DEI: 600k+.
Current supply on Luzon: 176k (with 200 aboard ships arriving day after tomorrow).
Current supply on Formosa: 78k (with roughly 600k aboard ships arriving in about four days).
Current supply in DEI: 600k+.
Current supply on Luzon: 176k (with 200 aboard ships arriving day after tomorrow).
Current supply on Formosa: 78k (with roughly 600k aboard ships arriving in about four days).
"Rats set fire to Mr. Cooper’s store in Fort Valley. No damage done." Columbus (Ga) Enquirer-Sun, October 2, 1880.
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent
Any plans on acquiring any bases that put fighters in range of the HI? I'm going to guess no. Is the 4E loses to points gained ratio something you can sustain for another 30K of mainly strategic bombing points without fighter support?
- Canoerebel
- Posts: 21099
- Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2002 11:21 pm
- Location: Northwestern Georgia, USA
- Contact:
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent
12/4/44
Fancy Pants:

Fancy Pants:

- Attachments
-
- 120444FancyPants.jpg (692.03 KiB) Viewed 357 times
"Rats set fire to Mr. Cooper’s store in Fort Valley. No damage done." Columbus (Ga) Enquirer-Sun, October 2, 1880.
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent
Please remember to hit the W key for hexside control on those monster Chinese battlemaps... pretty please.
- Canoerebel
- Posts: 21099
- Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2002 11:21 pm
- Location: Northwestern Georgia, USA
- Contact:
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent
ORIGINAL: palioboy2
Any plans on acquiring any bases that put fighters in range of the HI? I'm going to guess no. Is the 4E loses to points gained ratio something you can sustain for another 30K of mainly strategic bombing points without fighter support?
That's an interesting question. I bet it's being raptly discussed in John's AAR right now.
My feeling is that, as things currently stand, I can sustain the campaign.
Ningpo is within P-38 and P-51 of several big Kyushu bases, and B-24Js can reach into southern Honshu. That should work well with the Superforts.
I didn't get to try the Liberators very long before the supply limits set in, but the ops losses were surprisingly high for night raids.
So, this is an issue that I don't have a definite answer for. But I am cautiously optimistic that the Allied strategic bombing campaign will be effective going forward.
"Rats set fire to Mr. Cooper’s store in Fort Valley. No damage done." Columbus (Ga) Enquirer-Sun, October 2, 1880.
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent
ORIGINAL: Canoerebel
That's an interesting question. I bet it's being raptly discussed in John's AAR right now.
[:D] Goodness me. You don't want to know...trust me.
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent
ORIGINAL: Canoerebel
ORIGINAL: palioboy2
Any plans on acquiring any bases that put fighters in range of the HI? I'm going to guess no. Is the 4E loses to points gained ratio something you can sustain for another 30K of mainly strategic bombing points without fighter support?
That's an interesting question. I bet it's being raptly discussed in John's AAR right now.
My feeling is that, as things currently stand, I can sustain the campaign.
Ningpo is within P-38 and P-51 of several big Kyushu bases, and B-24Js can reach into southern Honshu. That should work well with the Superforts.
I didn't get to try the Liberators very long before the supply limits set in, but the ops losses were surprisingly high for night raids.
So, this is an issue that I don't have a definite answer for. But I am cautiously optimistic that the Allied strategic bombing campaign will be effective going forward.
You have all the time in the world. Almost literally.
Periodic sweeps of bases, even if you lose, will make him think he has to keep CAP everywhere he can or prioritize for the most important - allowing you to continue doing what you're doing.
- Capt. Harlock
- Posts: 5379
- Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2001 8:00 am
- Location: Los Angeles
- Contact:
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent
Lots of activity is ongoing in John's AAR. Until today, I thought he was working a plan for a big attack in the Formosa region. And he might be. But now I think it more likely that he's chewing over the Allied LOC and possibilities for interdicting Allied supply. Of course, those of you reading John's AAR will know if I way off base. But I like to think out loud because I suppose that would be most interesting to the reader.
"In our school histories at home, certainly in years past, those written in the North present a strikingly different picture of our Civil War from those written in the South. In some portions it is hard to realize they are dealing with the same war."
- George C. Marshall
You will definitely want to read John's AAR and discuss it with him once this game is over. [;)]
Civil war? What does that mean? Is there any foreign war? Isn't every war fought between men, between brothers?
--Victor Hugo
--Victor Hugo
- Canoerebel
- Posts: 21099
- Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2002 11:21 pm
- Location: Northwestern Georgia, USA
- Contact:
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent
I'm re-reading John B. Gordon's Reminiscences of the Civil War right now.
Meanwhile, for the past month or so, I've been researching the Georgia Secession Convention, giving special attention to the journal of the proceedings.
The former is just for pleasure. The latter is in preparation for writing a story about the crazy spiral of events that led to disunion.
Meanwhile, for the past month or so, I've been researching the Georgia Secession Convention, giving special attention to the journal of the proceedings.
The former is just for pleasure. The latter is in preparation for writing a story about the crazy spiral of events that led to disunion.
"Rats set fire to Mr. Cooper’s store in Fort Valley. No damage done." Columbus (Ga) Enquirer-Sun, October 2, 1880.
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent
That unit in the woods east of Changteh is heading east into swamp - where progress will be two miles a day! It will never get to Hankow in a timely manner that way! Better to send it NW to close a hex side on the enemy in that hex or send it NE to head for Ichang.ORIGINAL: Canoerebel
12/4/44
Fancy Pants:
![]()
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
- Canoerebel
- Posts: 21099
- Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2002 11:21 pm
- Location: Northwestern Georgia, USA
- Contact:
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent
Yeah, I know. But it's just a little arty unit. The reason it's on that heading is simply to add to the appearance of a widespread threat to the Japanese MLR. It doesn't matter where it's going or when it gets there. 
"Rats set fire to Mr. Cooper’s store in Fort Valley. No damage done." Columbus (Ga) Enquirer-Sun, October 2, 1880.
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent
You get more and more devious every week! I like it! [:)]ORIGINAL: Canoerebel
Yeah, I know. But it's just a little arty unit. The reason it's on that heading is simply to add to the appearance of a widespread threat to the Japanese MLR. It doesn't matter where it's going or when it gets there.![]()
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent
ORIGINAL: Canoerebel
Yeah, I know. But it's just a little arty unit. The reason it's on that heading is simply to add to the appearance of a widespread threat to the Japanese MLR. It doesn't matter where it's going or when it gets there.![]()
When I read this, all I can picture is the poor troops in the field; you just know they are saying " who the %%^^% thought this one up!!!!! Moving artillery through the swamp; c'mon man, isn't there a REMF unit that could do this ?
"After eight years as President I have only two regrets: that I have not shot Henry Clay or hanged John C. Calhoun."--1837
-
GetAssista
- Posts: 2836
- Joined: Sat Sep 19, 2009 6:13 am
RE: The Good The Bad & The Indifferent
Why arty? Chinese have so few of those it should be worth its weight in gold.
Men, on the other hand, are plenty. When I need some sacrificial duty from the Chinese I send yet another "New corps". You know, those smaller ones. ABC fragments work great too
Men, on the other hand, are plenty. When I need some sacrificial duty from the Chinese I send yet another "New corps". You know, those smaller ones. ABC fragments work great too






