Cruft vs. szmike, Babeslite Scen 1 with 3-day turns

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
Captain Cruft
Posts: 3760
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 12:49 pm
Location: England

Re: Soggy Biscuit "succeeds"

Post by Captain Cruft »

PaxMondo wrote: Sat Nov 08, 2025 12:55 am
Captain Cruft wrote: Fri Nov 07, 2025 10:30 pm 14 Jan 1944

Much to my surprise I managed to take Johore Bharu this turn.
WOW!!!

Stunning. Amazing!! WTG!!!!

I've never seen this type of successful counter-attack. Brilliant work!!!
It looks like it is only a matter of time before this gets reversed. I doubt I can hold on long enough to grind down the army at Singapore.

There are a butt load of troops at Malacca who look to be heading in my direction (highlighted). Also note that there are Allied troops at Johore Bahru itself, who must have arrived after I took the base.

soggysuccess.png
soggysuccess.png (203.74 KiB) Viewed 1623 times
User avatar
Captain Cruft
Posts: 3760
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 12:49 pm
Location: England

The P-47 is a very good aircraft (unfortunately)

Post by Captain Cruft »

20 Jan 1944

It looks like there is a single Indian Division at Johore Bahru at this point, so the reversal is not completely imminent.

Meanwhile, he has also started bombing Babeldoab with unescorted 4E bombers. However most of the B-24 losses you can see below were at Singapore, where my CAP remains unexhausted. Though it is looking decidedly ragged. More and more P-47s are popping up, and I have nothing which can compete with them.

airlosses2.png
airlosses2.png (177.96 KiB) Viewed 1613 times
User avatar
PaxMondo
Posts: 11391
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 3:23 pm

Re: The P-47 is a very good aircraft (unfortunately)

Post by PaxMondo »

Captain Cruft wrote: Sat Nov 08, 2025 10:48 pm ... More and more P-47s are popping up, and I have nothing which can compete with them.
Yeah, N1K, and Ki-84 are about the only things that can work at this point, but you have to have been aiming for them from the start in a PDU On game. F4U's should also be a real problem, but he may be hiding those yet ....

EDIT: Defensively, the J2M is your best choice against the P47 or F4U



:ugeek: :ugeek: :ugeek:
Pax
User avatar
Captain Cruft
Posts: 3760
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 12:49 pm
Location: England

Soggy Biscuit is disintegrating

Post by Captain Cruft »

23 Jan 1944

There are now 4 Allied Divisions at Johore Bahru, with more on the way by the looks of it. I have not managed to build any forts yet.

He has also deposited a butt load of aerial mines there, which makes things difficult as I have no minesweepers in the vicinity ...
User avatar
PaxMondo
Posts: 11391
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 3:23 pm

Re: Soggy Biscuit is disintegrating

Post by PaxMondo »

Captain Cruft wrote: Mon Nov 10, 2025 10:43 pm 23 Jan 1944

He has also deposited a butt load of aerial mines there, which makes things difficult as I have no minesweepers in the vicinity ...
Crap, I hate allied aerial mines. Hate them I say!!!!
:evil: :twisted: :evil:



:ugeek: :ugeek: :ugeek:
Pax
User avatar
Captain Cruft
Posts: 3760
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 12:49 pm
Location: England

Brave Truk!

Post by Captain Cruft »

19 Feb 1944

Soggy Biscuit failed. Five Indian Divisions appeared from nowhere and took all of 3 turns to annihilate my force at Johore Bharu.

Nothing much else has happened except that he has landed at Truk. Not something I would have done but it's quite interesting.

My troops have very little supply. I can only get it there by sub and transport aircraft, and yet they are doing quite well.

This was the second landing, the first was similar.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pre-Invasion action off Truk (112,108) - Coastal Guns Fire Back!
Defensive Guns engage approaching landing force

354 Coastal gun shots fired in defense.

Allied Ships
BB Pennsylvania, Shell hits 19, on fire
BB Oklahoma, Shell hits 24
BB Nevada, Shell hits 23, on fire
DD Shaw, Shell hits 4, on fire
DD Case, Shell hits 5
LCI-22, Shell hits 4, heavy fires, heavy damage
LCI-21, Shell hits 4, on fire, heavy damage
DD Allen
LCI-83, Shell hits 1
LCI-23
PG Sacramento
DD Tucker

Japanese ground losses:
24 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 5 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Allied ground losses:
67 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 13 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Truk (112,108)

Allied Deliberate attack

Attacking force 11856 troops, 211 guns, 205 vehicles, Assault Value = 388

Defending force 9420 troops, 173 guns, 43 vehicles, Assault Value = 168

Allied adjusted assault: 145

Japanese adjusted defense: 1144

Allied assault odds: 1 to 7 (fort level 6)

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), forts(+), disruption(-), supply(-)
Attacker: leaders(-)

Japanese ground losses:
329 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 35 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Allied ground losses:
250 casualties reported
Squads: 2 destroyed, 38 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 3 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled

Assaulting units:
33rd Infantry Division

Defending units:
Maizuru 1st SNLF
1st Ind.Tank Co
66th Naval Guard Unit
7th Naval Const Bn /1
Truk Naval Fortress
4th Base Force
31st Army /1

truklandings.png
truklandings.png (20.86 KiB) Viewed 1364 times
User avatar
Captain Cruft
Posts: 3760
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 12:49 pm
Location: England

Siege after Siege

Post by Captain Cruft »

04 April 1944

It's been a while since I posted, but the game continues, albeit at a very slow pace. We both want to finish but my opponent has very little time due to work.

Japan is under siege everywhere.

I have finally had to abandon Singapore as an airbase after a serious amount of visitations by 4E bombers and numerous British battleships. It has fulfilled its function though, in terms of causing a significant delay in the Brits moving into China. It has however cost me an enormous number of fighter planes, mostly Zeroes and Tojos.

sing0444.jpg
sing0444.jpg (58.07 KiB) Viewed 44 times
airlosses0444.jpg
airlosses0444.jpg (16.65 KiB) Viewed 41 times
Last edited by Captain Cruft on Tue Nov 10, 2026 5:47 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
Captain Cruft
Posts: 3760
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 12:49 pm
Location: England

Re: Siege after Siege

Post by Captain Cruft »

Truk

Truk is now in Allied hands. It cost him quite a few transport ships. The coastal guns in the Fortress continued to shoot despite being continually bombed and having essentially no supply.

truk0444.jpg
truk0444.jpg (5.8 KiB) Viewed 41 times
User avatar
Captain Cruft
Posts: 3760
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 12:49 pm
Location: England

Re: Siege after Siege

Post by Captain Cruft »

Peleliu or Babeldoab?

It looks like the next invasion target in the Pacific is either Peleliu or Babeldoab. Both have received preparatory air attacks.

peli0444.jpg
peli0444.jpg (13.2 KiB) Viewed 39 times
User avatar
Captain Cruft
Posts: 3760
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 12:49 pm
Location: England

Re: Siege after Siege

Post by Captain Cruft »

Peking and Tientsin

He is trying to isolate Peking. I have one of my 3 armoured divisions trying to stop him, but it's only a matter of time.

peking0444.jpg
peking0444.jpg (34.21 KiB) Viewed 38 times
User avatar
Captain Cruft
Posts: 3760
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 12:49 pm
Location: England

Re: Siege after Siege

Post by Captain Cruft »

Manchuria

Changchun and Yenki are besieged. My artillery is doing quite well against the besiegers, at least thus far.

manchu0444.jpg
manchu0444.jpg (58.13 KiB) Viewed 37 times
User avatar
Captain Cruft
Posts: 3760
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 12:49 pm
Location: England

Re: Siege after Siege

Post by Captain Cruft »

Komsomolsk

I continue to hold the (IMO) very important base of Komsomolsk. He has moved significant forces there, but as it a large river hex I am able to bombard the blighters with cruisers and destroyers based at Nikolaevsk. This may be why he has not actually attacked yet.

komso0444.jpg
komso0444.jpg (42.56 KiB) Viewed 36 times
User avatar
Captain Cruft
Posts: 3760
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 12:49 pm
Location: England

Re: Siege after Siege

Post by Captain Cruft »

Endgame

Japan has 2.745m HI points and 6,449 ready land-based aircraft. The IJN is largely intact. Combat losses amount to 6 x CL, 15 x DD & 15 x SS. The Emperor remains hopeful that the Decisive Battle can still be won, and victory achieved, but the VP situation says something somewhat different.

vps0444.jpg
vps0444.jpg (5.17 KiB) Viewed 20 times
User avatar
PaxMondo
Posts: 11391
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 3:23 pm

Re: Cruft vs. szmike, Babeslite Scen 1 with 3-day turns

Post by PaxMondo »

How and when did the SOV activate?
Pax
User avatar
Captain Cruft
Posts: 3760
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 12:49 pm
Location: England

Re: Cruft vs. szmike, Babeslite Scen 1 with 3-day turns

Post by Captain Cruft »

PaxMondo wrote: Tue Nov 10, 2026 10:45 pm How and when did the SOV activate?
I attacked them, spring 1942. Read the whole AAR for the story.
User avatar
PaxMondo
Posts: 11391
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 3:23 pm

Re: Cruft vs. szmike, Babeslite Scen 1 with 3-day turns

Post by PaxMondo »

Captain Cruft wrote: Tue Nov 10, 2026 11:40 pm
PaxMondo wrote: Tue Nov 10, 2026 10:45 pm How and when did the SOV activate?
I attacked them, spring 1942. Read the whole AAR for the story.
Sorry! Forgot!!!

Yes, looks like I need to re-read it as my memory no longer serves me ....
:o :cry:





:ugeek: :ugeek: :ugeek:
Pax
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”