Post Map and OOB Comments Here

Gary Grigsby's strategic level wargame covering the entire War in the Pacific from 1941 to 1945 or beyond.

Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

Post Reply
User avatar
Raverdave
Posts: 4882
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2002 5:00 pm
Location: Melb. Australia

RE: Post Map and OOB Comments Here

Post by Raverdave »

ORIGINAL: sprior

I see the Flower Class corvettes as PGs (Which I don't have a problem with) but would like to be able to add them as escorts in the auto-convoy system so I can use them as intended.

This a bit of a funny one as there were also used a lot as MSWs and had the sweeping gear, but they were also used as escorts. Corvettes are normally classed as PGs (Patrol Gun???).
Image


Never argue with an idiot, he will only drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.
User avatar
pry
Posts: 938
Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2002 7:19 am
Location: Overlooking Galveston Bay, Texas

RE: Post Map and OOB Comments Here

Post by pry »

OOB Data Collected...

IMPORTANT NOTE

Please post OOB comments and issues in this thread only, time does not allow reading each and every thread looking for OOB issues, SO if it does not get listed here it may get missed...

Please include scenario number when reporting an issue and as much detail as possible. Please remember there are 14 scenarios and the tutorial. So scenario number is needed to help us figure out what you are reporting.
User avatar
sprior
Posts: 8294
Joined: Mon Jun 17, 2002 11:38 pm
Location: Portsmouth, UK

RE: Post Map and OOB Comments Here

Post by sprior »

ORIGINAL: Raverdave
ORIGINAL: sprior

I see the Flower Class corvettes as PGs (Which I don't have a problem with) but would like to be able to add them as escorts in the auto-convoy system so I can use them as intended.

This a bit of a funny one as there were also used a lot as MSWs and had the sweeping gear, but they were also used as escorts. Corvettes are normally classed as PGs (Patrol Gun???).

I've never heard of the Flower class being used as minesweepers or even having sweeping gear on board.
"Grown ups are what's left when skool is finished."
"History started badly and hav been geting steadily worse."
- Nigel Molesworth.

Image
User avatar
Bulldog61
Posts: 337
Joined: Sun Jul 23, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Aurora,CO

RE: Post Map and OOB Comments Here

Post by Bulldog61 »

ORIGINAL: McNaughton

Should the 14th, 17th, 20th, 23rd and 26th Indian Divisions have TOE's of Infantry Brigades instead of Divisions?

If you are refering to scen 15 they begin at brigade strength but if you look at there TOE, you'll see that they will build up to divisional strength. It will take a while though!
You can run but you'll die tired!
User avatar
Brady
Posts: 6084
Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2002 12:48 pm
Location: Oregon,USA

RE: Post Map and OOB Comments Here

Post by Brady »

Ki-67, is aparently Not Torpedo capable in the game, the data bases does not show this weapon type listed for it, Why is that? They used Torpedoes operationaly, both the Army and Navy Ki-67's used torps.

P1Y, Not listed as Torpedo capable either.
Image


SCW Beta Support Team

Beta Team Member for:

WPO
PC
CF
AE
WiTE

Obi-wan Kenobi said it best: A lot of the reality we perceive depend on our point of view
Mike Scholl
Posts: 6187
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 1:17 am
Location: Kansas City, MO

RE: Post Map and OOB Comments Here

Post by Mike Scholl »

Still cruising the map trying to get a "feel" for everything..., but I did notice one
GLARING error in the PH/Ohau OB. The "CD" unit is totally wrong, showing 3 16"
guns and 41 155's. A quick glance at my Coastal Artillery References shows a
minimum of the following present 12/7/41:

4 16" Guns; 2 14" Guns; 4 12" Guns; 20 12" CD Mortars (though some of these
may have been removed when it was found that the pits could fire more effeciently
and faster with 2 mountings rather than 4); 6 240mm CD Howitzers; 10 8" Guns
(8 of these on RR mountings); 14 155's in CD mountings; and 4 6" Guns plus a number
of smaller weapons.

Also noticed a couple of oddities in the "Weapons" section. It shows 12" guns with a
much greater range than 14, 15, or 16 inch weapons---and it shows the 14" gun with
a massive anti-armor strength compared to it's brotheren. Looks like a few things
"slipped through the cracks" guys.
HawaiiFive-O
Posts: 295
Joined: Fri Dec 20, 2002 10:21 pm
Location: USA

Scenario 6, Marianas

Post by HawaiiFive-O »

A follow up to my previous post on Scenario 6.

I did some internet research. I was wrong about Saipan getting a minefield. Sources remark about the surprise from Navy divers that there was no minefield. So Saipan not having a minefield is fine.

But Tinian and Guam should, or at least the accounts I've read include mention of mines. They particularly caused some grief to landing forces on Guam. The fields were avoided on Tinian.

And Palau should get a minefield as well, in case the USN gets uppity.

And how 'bout some forts on the smaller islands? How long have those lazy slug-a-bed Japanese ground forces been on Pagan? And not even a level 1 fort? [:D]
Image
User avatar
Pascal_slith
Posts: 1657
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2003 2:39 am
Location: In Arizona now!

RE: Post Map and OOB Comments Here

Post by Pascal_slith »

ORIGINAL: Mike Scholl

Still cruising the map trying to get a "feel" for everything..., but I did notice one
GLARING error in the PH/Ohau OB. The "CD" unit is totally wrong, showing 3 16"
guns and 41 155's. A quick glance at my Coastal Artillery References shows a
minimum of the following present 12/7/41:

4 16" Guns; 2 14" Guns; 4 12" Guns; 20 12" CD Mortars (though some of these
may have been removed when it was found that the pits could fire more effeciently
and faster with 2 mountings rather than 4); 6 240mm CD Howitzers; 10 8" Guns
(8 of these on RR mountings); 14 155's in CD mountings; and 4 6" Guns plus a number
of smaller weapons.

Also noticed a couple of oddities in the "Weapons" section. It shows 12" guns with a
much greater range than 14, 15, or 16 inch weapons---and it shows the 14" gun with
a massive anti-armor strength compared to it's brotheren. Looks like a few things
"slipped through the cracks" guys.

Could you note the complete reference to your source?
So much WitP and so little time to play.... :-(

Image
anarchyintheuk
Posts: 3958
Joined: Wed May 05, 2004 7:08 pm
Location: Dallas

RE: Post Map and OOB Comments Here

Post by anarchyintheuk »

I think that's 9 more kills than the Shindens accumulated. Sorry, couldn't resist.
User avatar
Bombur
Posts: 3666
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 4:50 am

RE: Post Map and OOB Comments Here

Post by Bombur »

-It seems there is a IJA squadron equipped with Ki-44´s in early game. This is wrong, as the plane only appeared in late 1942 (I wrongly placed a thread abouth this topic, sorry guys..).

-We need the P-51H, the F8F, P-47N, P-61C and other late allied planes. I personally would like to see some G8N´s and Ki-83´s too, at least their graphics in the scenario editor (althought I´m already happy with the J7W and the A7M2)
TIMJOT
Posts: 1705
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2001 8:00 am

RE: Post Map and OOB Comments Here

Post by TIMJOT »

ORIGINAL: Bombur

-It seems there is a IJA squadron equipped with Ki-44´s in early game. This is wrong, as the plane only appeared in late 1942 (I wrongly placed a thread abouth this topic, sorry guys..).

-

Bombur, There was a special (production run unit) the 47th Independent Flying Chutai which operated Ki-44 Shoki fighters ( six IIRC ) in fought in both Malaya and Burma Dec 41 thru April 42.

Source: "A Boody Shambles" Vol.2 ( Shores )

Regards
Mike Scholl
Posts: 6187
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 1:17 am
Location: Kansas City, MO

RE: Post Map and OOB Comments Here

Post by Mike Scholl »

PASCAL Check the web sight for "The Coast Defense Study Group"
User avatar
Brady
Posts: 6084
Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2002 12:48 pm
Location: Oregon,USA

RE: Post Map and OOB Comments Here

Post by Brady »

Hutricane II, Aparently we have the "C" in the Game and I am fairly Certain that what was in theater was the A and the B (more the B model), which had 303's not 20mm Hispanos.

...............................

"Bombur, There was a special (production run unit) the 47th Independent Flying Chutai which operated Ki-44 Shoki fighters ( six IIRC ) in fought in both Malaya and Burma Dec 41 thru April 42"

My Book By Buschel on the Ki-44 covers this as well, as does Francillion.

.........................

Note on late war Allied fighter types as aposed to the Late war Japanese ones: This was brought up some time ago during the Betta pahse on this forum, and I beelave the consensious was that since Japanese production was playable that these types which were in production, and some did see combate, neaded to be included so players could posably get them built. Since prety much every standard US fighter type in service in the game at the end of the war is Better than they anyway, the point of adding the US ones that are not represented, Bearcate for example, was considered mute. It should also be noted that not every unit can upgrade to whatever plane type it wants to even if you bild tons of them it will not mater only a limited number of units can man them, and Japanese piolet skill will likely be so bad even if you have these wounder rifes they will die in droves.
Image


SCW Beta Support Team

Beta Team Member for:

WPO
PC
CF
AE
WiTE

Obi-wan Kenobi said it best: A lot of the reality we perceive depend on our point of view
User avatar
Brady
Posts: 6084
Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2002 12:48 pm
Location: Oregon,USA

RE: Post Map and OOB Comments Here

Post by Brady »

O.....In case somebody forgot...all those missing Russian ships we all talked about a while ago.[:)]
Image


SCW Beta Support Team

Beta Team Member for:

WPO
PC
CF
AE
WiTE

Obi-wan Kenobi said it best: A lot of the reality we perceive depend on our point of view
pad152
Posts: 2835
Joined: Sun Apr 23, 2000 8:00 am

RE: Post Map and OOB Comments Here

Post by pad152 »

Float planes for British ships would be nice!
User avatar
Tankerace
Posts: 5408
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2003 12:23 pm
Location: Stillwater, OK, United States

RE: Post Map and OOB Comments Here

Post by Tankerace »

OK, I guess no one else has noticed it, so I will point it out. I guess the reason that British ships don't have float planes is because the British, since early 1941, began to rely on radar. By late 1941, the Walrus was being phased out aboard ship, and in late 1941 and 1942 catapaults were being removed, so that by 1943 most British cruisers and battleships had them landed. While PoW and Repulse DID have their float planes, IIRC they were the only British capital ships to have their catapaults plus float planes when deployed to the Far East/Pacific.

I agree that it would be nice to have them, but considering had they survived it is quite probable that by mid-late 1942 they would have been landed, it would be a waste to spend effort to get them in to the game, when they would hardly be used. I would like ot see them, but I won't cry if I don't get them.
Designer of War Plan Orange
Allied Naval OOBer of Admiral's Edition
Naval Team Lead for War in the Med

Author of Million-Dollar Barrage: American Field Artillery in the Great War coming soon from OU Press.
User avatar
Brady
Posts: 6084
Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2002 12:48 pm
Location: Oregon,USA

RE: Post Map and OOB Comments Here

Post by Brady »

Their were several Warlurs Units in the Far east and the Pacific War in general, howeaver and they are not in the game either, so it is not like were just talking about the Pow and Repulse hear. I recal seeing an oob listing for the CBI early one and their were a few of these units listed in theater. Right Now I would love to have some Sea planes for Scouting in the CBI.
Image


SCW Beta Support Team

Beta Team Member for:

WPO
PC
CF
AE
WiTE

Obi-wan Kenobi said it best: A lot of the reality we perceive depend on our point of view
sb1171
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2003 4:58 pm
Location: England

RE: Post Map and OOB Comments Here

Post by sb1171 »

I don't know if this one has already been picked up but the Tachibana class DD's have a forward facing type 13 Radar in the place where it appears a 5in gun should be. (The editor also lists this radar as having 36 ammo!)
User avatar
Pascal_slith
Posts: 1657
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2003 2:39 am
Location: In Arizona now!

RE: Post Map and OOB Comments Here

Post by Pascal_slith »

South Pacific HQ should be in Pearl Harbor on Dec. 7. It did not exist until later and was first based in New Zealand.
So much WitP and so little time to play.... :-(

Image
User avatar
Lemurs!
Posts: 788
Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2004 7:27 pm

RE: Post Map and OOB Comments Here

Post by Lemurs! »

Mike Scholl,

I completely agree with your post on Pearl Harbour coast defense. However, the new model 14" shell used by the old battleships after being repaired is considered to be the best penetrator ever made. I will not have as much effect but will penetrate nearly anything.

Mike
Image
Post Reply

Return to “War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945”