Page 6 of 7

RE: Richard III

Posted: Sat Feb 09, 2013 9:29 am
by stockwellpete
The War of the Roses would make an excellent subject for a two-player WEGO computer wargame. I know there is a new game called exactly this but it is an action-type game rather than a political strategy-type game. I have played Field of Glory PC a lot oer the last two years and I have designed custom scenarios for all the main battles plus I linked them all up with a very basic text campaign system (in hard copy, not a computer programme). And the results of the campaigns that have been played have come out fairly evenly between Yorkists and Lancastrians - basically victory points are awarded for winning battles and killing leaders of the other faction. So I think a well-researched wargame for the PC would be a very interesting project indeed.

RE: Richard III

Posted: Sat Feb 09, 2013 9:51 am
by Empire101
ORIGINAL: stockwellpete

The War of the Roses would make an excellent subject for a two-player WEGO computer wargame. I know there is a new game called exactly this but it is an action-type game rather than a political strategy-type game. I have played Field of Glory PC a lot oer the last two years and I have designed custom scenarios for all the main battles plus I linked them all up with a very basic text campaign system (in hard copy, not a computer programme). And the results of the campaigns that have been played have come out fairly evenly between Yorkists and Lancastrians - basically victory points are awarded for winning battles and killing leaders of the other faction. So I think a well-researched wargame for the PC would be a very interesting project indeed.

I would buy it!![:)]

Kingmaker writ large.....one day....one glorious day...

RE: Richard III

Posted: Sat Feb 09, 2013 11:11 am
by redcoat
ORIGINAL: stockwellpete

The War of the Roses would make an excellent subject for a two-player WEGO computer wargame. I know there is a new game called exactly this but it is an action-type game rather than a political strategy-type game. I have played Field of Glory PC a lot oer the last two years and I have designed custom scenarios for all the main battles plus I linked them all up with a very basic text campaign system (in hard copy, not a computer programme). And the results of the campaigns that have been played have come out fairly evenly between Yorkists and Lancastrians - basically victory points are awarded for winning battles and killing leaders of the other faction. So I think a well-researched wargame for the PC would be a very interesting project indeed.

I have played many of your Wars of the Roses scenarios. Very good. Thanks for making them.

RE: Richard III

Posted: Sat Feb 09, 2013 3:30 pm
by Toby42
ORIGINAL: warspite1

ORIGINAL: Curtis Lemay

ORIGINAL: warspite1


warspite1

Well certainly not French - the Normans (largely descended from Vikings - Norsemen) did not really consider themselves French at all. Welcome to the hotch potch of European history.

Even the Conquerer's children were a blend. But for sure, Henry II was the son of Geoffrey of Anjou, and Henry's wife was from Aquitaine. So Richard I was, at best, 1/4 Norman - the rest mostly French. John's wife was from Angouleme & his son's wife was from Provence. Then Edward I & Edward II had French wives. You have to go to Edward III to find a non-French wife. Then Henry V & Henry VI were back to French again. The Plantagenets were pretty much French.
warspite1

But not French in the sense we know today. Could you argue that the 100-years war was in fact a French civil war?


Isn't the present day Royal Family of German Ancestry?

RE: Richard III

Posted: Sat Feb 09, 2013 3:39 pm
by Empire101
Correct.

Thats why I posted Richard was the very last 'true' English King.

As to them speaking french; french was the the language of the court as custom dictated, but he spoke english when 'off duty'[:D]

RE: Richard III

Posted: Sat Feb 09, 2013 3:40 pm
by wodin
yes..Saxo Gothbergs

RE: Richard III

Posted: Sat Feb 09, 2013 4:12 pm
by redcoat
ORIGINAL: Treale

Isn't the present day Royal Family of German Ancestry?

Most English people have some Germanic ancestry. The Anglo-Saxons originally came from NW Europe. [:D]

RE: Richard III

Posted: Sat Feb 09, 2013 4:27 pm
by warspite1
ORIGINAL: wodin

yes..Saxo Gothbergs
warspite1

Also known as Saxe-Coburg Gotha. Queen Victoria's husband Prince Albert came from that House, although Victoria herself was of German descent - her father was the son of King George III (of Hanoverian descent, and whose Grandfather - George II - was the last English King born outside the UK) and her mother was also German of the Saxe-Coburg Saalfeld House.

Still with it? Good cos I'm thoroughly confused

RE: Richard III

Posted: Sat Feb 09, 2013 5:02 pm
by rodney727
Some people wanted George Washington to be the first king of America... If in fact that happened he would have been of English decent.
ORIGINAL: warspite1

ORIGINAL: wodin

yes..Saxo Gothbergs
warspite1

Also known as Saxe-Coburg Gotha. Queen Victoria's husband Prince Albert came from that House, although Victoria herself was of German descent - her father was the son of King George III (of Hanoverian descent, and whose Grandfather - George II - was the last English King born outside the UK) and her mother was also German of the Saxe-Coburg Saalfeld House.

Still with it? Good cos I'm thoroughly confused

RE: Richard III

Posted: Sat Feb 09, 2013 5:31 pm
by Toby42
I remember reading a book on the "Conquest". I think that it stated that 40% of the Anglo Saxons were killed? That's quite a bit. But I think that William was pretty ruthless in his conquests. And wasn't a lot of land given to his cronies that came over with him?

I'm fascinated with English / British History and I don't have any English or French blood in me!!!

RE: Richard III

Posted: Sat Feb 09, 2013 6:04 pm
by ckammp
ORIGINAL: Empire101

Correct.

Thats why I posted Richard was the very last 'true' English King.

As to them speaking french; french was the the language of the court as custom dictated, but he spoke english when 'off duty'[:D]


The Tudor dynasty that followed the York dynasty was the most "English" dynasty to rule England from 1066 to the present day. Thus claim to be the last 'true' English King should actually go to Elizabeth I.

As to the German ancestry; it is of course true the present House of Windsor has a strong strain of German, but that is rapidly diminishing.
Elizabeth II's father, George VI, was the first English King to marry an English woman since Henry VIII (not counting the unique situation of William & Mary), and both Prince Charles and Prince William married English woman.

RE: Richard III

Posted: Sat Feb 09, 2013 6:27 pm
by warspite1
As to the German ancestry; it is of course true the present House of Windsor has a strong strain of German, but that is rapidly diminishing.


Its a point similar to that I made when we had the Queen's Jubilee thread in the summer. Some people like to sneer that the Royal Family is "German" - like its a bad thing.

Compare how far back the German influence goes (as per ckammp's comment above) and then look at that against how we treat immigrants in this country. In response to neanderthals telling immigrants to go back home - the answer is often, I am home I was born here. Well so was QEII, and her dad and her mum and her Grandad etc

RE: Richard III

Posted: Sat Feb 09, 2013 6:48 pm
by Toby42
I think that a fitting testament to the English is that the last words in the book that I read were: After a period of time, the conquerors became English. The English didn't become Norman!

RE: Richard III

Posted: Sat Feb 09, 2013 7:22 pm
by Alfred
Henry Tudor was Welsh.

Alfred

RE: Richard III

Posted: Sat Feb 09, 2013 8:22 pm
by Zorch
Henry Tudor's father's father was Welsh. His father's mother was French (the widow of Henry V).
His mother was descended from Edward III.

The saying that the Tudors were 'the most English dynasty since...' is based on the other Tudors, IMHO.

RE: Richard III

Posted: Sat Feb 09, 2013 8:23 pm
by warspite1
ORIGINAL: Zorch

Henry Tudor's father's father was Welsh. His father's mother was French (the widow of Henry V).
His mother was descended from Edward III.

The saying that the Tudors were 'the most English dynasty since...' is based on the other Tudors, IMHO.
warspite1

...that and the fact he was born in Wales [;)]

RE: Richard III

Posted: Sat Feb 09, 2013 8:26 pm
by Zorch
Didn't Queen Elizabeth II change the name of the current royal family to Windsor-Mountbatten, in honor of her husband?

RE: Richard III

Posted: Sat Feb 09, 2013 8:37 pm
by warspite1
ORIGINAL: Zorch

Didn't Queen Elizabeth II change the name of the current royal family to Windsor-Mountbatten, in honor of her husband?
warspite1

Not sure of the legal schmegals - but its something to do with the Battenburgs (more Germans!!) who became Mountbatten in WWI(?) - and Prince Philip is a decendent of the Battenburg line.

Our First Sea Lord in 1914, Prince Louis of Battenburg, was hounded out of office for being too German in the eyes of some morons. Not sure when the change of name took place.

RE: Richard III

Posted: Sat Feb 09, 2013 8:40 pm
by Zorch
George V changed it to Windsor (from Saxe-Coburg) during WWI.

RE: Richard III

Posted: Sat Feb 09, 2013 8:45 pm
by warspite1
ORIGINAL: Zorch

George V changed it to Windsor (from Saxe-Coburg) during WWI.
warspite1

Zorch the question must reference the addition of Mountbatten, not the change to Windsor, as that was not a change made by the Queen.

Edit: Hold on, I 've just realised you asked the question....[&:][X(] What the .....???