Page 6 of 371
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues
Posted: Thu Nov 14, 2013 4:57 am
by Rob322
I saw both CV 41 Midway and CV 43 Coral Sea had space for AIM-54A and C in their magazines. But those carriers couldn't carry the F-14 and none of the jets they could carry could handle the AIM-54.
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues
Posted: Thu Nov 14, 2013 12:32 pm
by MR_BURNS2
ORIGINAL: Rob322
I saw both CV 41 Midway and CV 43 Coral Sea had space for AIM-54A and C in their magazines. But those carriers couldn't carry the F-14 and none of the jets they could carry could handle the AIM-54.
Its up to the scenario designer to get the magazine loadout right, going into detail about which magazine can carry this and that and which cant would demand a little too much from the developers.
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues
Posted: Thu Nov 14, 2013 3:17 pm
by e2204588
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues
Posted: Thu Nov 14, 2013 4:39 pm
by Russian Heel
I just noticed in the editor (in both DB)The Soviet Army assets are incorrectly labeled as "Red Army." In 1946 it stopped being the "Workers and Peasants Red Army" and became the "Soviet Army." Since this sim is so detail oriented I feel this should be corrected.
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues
Posted: Fri Nov 15, 2013 1:18 am
by Mgellis
I may have requested a couple of these already, but that was in another thread, so I'm reposting to make sure they aren't missed. I think adding more coast guard platforms will be helpful to scenario writers because I have a feeling that as budget cuts, etc. come into play, coast guard vessels may be called on more and more to fill in gaps for the Navy. They won't be part of battle groups, but they might do things that might otherwise be assigned to an LCS or a Navy patrol boat...some of them are almost as well-armed as an LCS, after all.
Defender-class boat
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USCG_Defender_class_boat <-- slightly different than other similar boats, in terms of weapons, so it probably deserves its own entry
http://www.uscg.mil/datasheet/25rbs.asp
http://www.safeboats.com/boats/defender-250/
http://www.boattest.com/resources/view_ ... NewsID=853
41-foot Utility Boat, Large
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USCG_Utility_Boat <-- not armed, but might be used to spot hostile vessels, rescue civilians, etc. I also suspect putting a machine gun or two on this would not be too hard.
http://www.uscg.mil/history/assets/boat ... tyBoat.pdf
Response Boat – Medium
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Response_boat-medium
http://www.uscg.mil/acquisition/rbm/pdf/rb-m.pdf
Marine Protector-class coastal patrol boat
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marine_Pro ... atrol_boat
http://www.uscg.mil/datasheet/87wpb.asp
http://www.bollingershipyards.com/Portf ... -Boats-CPB
http://www.uscg.mil/hq/cg9/newsroom/pdf ... t08sup.pdf
http://www.uscg.mil/hq/cg9/newsroom/pdf ... rMay09.pdf
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ ... -specs.htm
Offshore Patrol Cutter
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Offshore_Patrol_Cutter
http://www.uscg.mil/hq/cg9/opc/pdf/Sect ... .rev.a.pdf
http://www.uscg.mil/hq/cg9/opc/default.asp
http://www.uscg.mil/hq/cg9/opc/pdf/opc.pdf
http://www.defensemedianetwork.com/stor ... ol-cutter/
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ ... cutter.htm
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ ... -specs.htm
Sentinel-class cutter
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sentinel-class_cutter
http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/vot ... ram-03160/
http://wikialpha.org/wiki/Sentinel_class_cutter
http://www.defensemedianetwork.com/stor ... rol-boats/
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ ... -specs.htm
National Security Cutter
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Security_Cutter
https://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/th ... ers-03614/
http://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/ ... tters.aspx
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ ... -specs.htm
Thanks!
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues
Posted: Sat Nov 16, 2013 11:36 am
by Dobey455
The Airbus A330-200 MRTT in Australian service (RAAF - Aircraft 1827) should have both a centerline boom and wing drogues, it currently has wing drogues only.
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues
Posted: Sat Nov 16, 2013 3:54 pm
by Apocal
MH-53E Sea Dragon (1984)
Loadout AN/AQS-14 Helicopter-Towed Minehunting Sonar requires zero AN/AQS-14 sonars, making the loadout unusable.
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues
Posted: Sat Nov 16, 2013 4:38 pm
by mikmykWS
Various requests logged to look at.
M
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues
Posted: Sun Nov 17, 2013 1:27 am
by e2204588
SH-60J and SH-60K have no sonobuoy in their loadout currently.
According to
http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/SH-60J_(%E ... 9.E5.93.81
They can carry 25x sonobuoys. (ソノブイ)
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues
Posted: Sun Nov 17, 2013 3:51 am
by Mgellis
I can't remember if anyone has suggested these yet (apologies for any duplications)...
Damen Stan 4207 patrol vessel
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Damen_Stan ... rol_vessel <-- there's like 40 of these in service in various places around the world; some sub-classes will probably have to be included
http://www.damen.com/en/markets/stan-patrol
Swiftships 12m Patrol Boat
http://ss.veriqual.com/military/specifi ... trol-boat/
Swiftships 14m High Speed Interceptor
http://ss.veriqual.com/military/specifi ... terceptor/
Swiftships 26 Meter Patrol Boat
http://ss.veriqual.com/military/specifi ... trol-boat/
Swiftships 28m Patrol Boat
http://ss.veriqual.com/military/specifi ... trol-boat/
Swiftships 35m Patrol Boat
http://ss.veriqual.com/military/specification/4545-2/
Algerian MEKO-200 (supposedly the same as the South African version, but I'm not sure...it may need its own database listing; it might be helpful to simply copy the listing and list it under Algeria anyway, just to avoid confusion, even if the ships are the same in terms of design, sensors, weapons, etc.)
Damen Stan 2600
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Damen_Stan_2600
http://www.damen.com/en/markets/stan-patrol
http://damenshipyardshardinxveld.nl/en/ ... atrol/2606
http://worldmaritimenews.com/archives/37430/
(Side note...I found another source for the Sentinel USCG Cutter:
http://www.uscg.mil/hq/cg9/newsroom/pdf ... abrief.pdf)
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues
Posted: Sun Nov 17, 2013 11:15 am
by Apocal
False Contact (Small) and False Contact (Medium) are both listed as subsurface contacts but are readily detectable by P-3's ISAR radar and AN/APS-124 of a SH-60F.
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues
Posted: Sun Nov 17, 2013 11:47 am
by Rudd
ORIGINAL: Apocal
False Contact (Small) and False Contact (Medium) are both listed as subsurface contacts but are readily detectable by P-3's ISAR radar and AN/APS-124 of a SH-60F.
I believe the scenario writer has to place them below periscope depth(shallow or deeper), as with all subs, or else the surface search radars find them quite easily.
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues
Posted: Sun Nov 17, 2013 12:26 pm
by mikmykWS
Requests updated. Thanks guys!
Mike
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues
Posted: Sun Nov 17, 2013 12:46 pm
by bsq
1609 Patriot - Israel = wrong missiles for a GEM+ modified system.
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues
Posted: Sun Nov 17, 2013 12:49 pm
by bsq
Asked for before, but could we have an RC-135W for the United Kingdom - it was delivered last week...
http://www.raf.mod.uk/news/archive/firs ... k-12112013
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues
Posted: Sun Nov 17, 2013 1:22 pm
by mikmykWS
Fix request added and prior request updated
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues
Posted: Sun Nov 17, 2013 2:24 pm
by bsq
1789 Pechora 2M - states twin rail launchers (correct) assigned 4/4 SA-3C Goa missiles (incorrect) should be 2/2 as per the fact its a twin rail launcher
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues
Posted: Sun Nov 17, 2013 2:35 pm
by bsq
The tacsams, SA-9, SA-11, SA-15, SA-17, SA-19, SA-22 do not have magazines yet the tacsams SA-4, 6, 8 and 13 do. I presume that the 'magazines' are actually a way of abstracting the transloaders? In that case please add 2 extra sets of reloads per system to the first group of tacsams mentioned in this post.
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues
Posted: Sun Nov 17, 2013 3:02 pm
by mikmykWS
Logged. Thanks!
Mike
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues
Posted: Sun Nov 17, 2013 7:44 pm
by Barny23
I am missing this one in the German (FGR) Luftwaffe part of the DB3000
From Wikipidia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikoyan_MiG-29
The German Democratic Republic (also known as East Germany) bought 24 MiG-29s (20 MiG-29As, four MiG-29UBs), which entered service in 1988–1989. After the fall of the Berlin Wall in November 1989 and reunification of Germany in October 1990, the MiG-29s and other aircraft of the East German Air Forces of the National People's Army were integrated into the West German Luftwaffe.[citation needed]
The Federation of American Scientists claims the MiG-29 is equal or better than the F-15C in some areas such as short aerial engagements because of the Helmet Mounted Weapons Sight (HMS) and better maneuverability at slow speeds.[68] This was demonstrated when MiG-29s of the German Air Force participated in joint DACT exercises with US fighters.[69][70] The HMS was a great help, allowing the Germans to achieve a lock on any target the pilot could see within the missile field of view, including those almost 45 degrees off boresight.[71] In contrast, the American aircraft were only able to lock onto targets in a narrow window directly in front of the aircraft’s nose. It was not until late 2003 that the USAF and US Navy achieved Initial Operational Capability of the Joint Helmet Mounted Cueing System.
Since 1993 the German MiGs were stationed with 1./JG73 "Steinhoff" in Laage near Rostock. During the service in the German Air Force one MiG-29 ("29+09") was destroyed during an accident on 25 June 1996 due to pilot error. By 2003, German Air Force pilots had flown over 30,000 hours in the MiG-29. In September 2003, 22 of the 23 remaining machines were sold to the Polish Air Force for the symbolic price of €1 per item.[72] The last aircraft were transferred in August 2004.[73] The 23rd MiG-29 ("29+03") was put on display at Laage.
Barny