Page 6 of 31
RE: Dec 17, 1944 - large naval battle sequence
Posted: Fri Aug 22, 2014 2:07 pm
by HansBolter
ORIGINAL: topeverest
Not sure what you mean. Should I be using it or him?
ORIGINAL: HansBolter
one acronym........LRCAP
You.
The LRCP will follow your TF to the full extent of its range, albeit with diminishing effectiveness.
This provides cover outside the 3 hex range of normal CAP.
RE: Dec 17, 1944 - large naval battle sequence
Posted: Sat Aug 23, 2014 1:17 pm
by topeverest
Ironically, all these years I've been playing I tend not to use LRCAP on CV's. I do use it in LBA all the time.
Does it really work out that far on CV's to any effect?
ORIGINAL: HansBolter
ORIGINAL: topeverest
Not sure what you mean. Should I be using it or him?
ORIGINAL: HansBolter
one acronym........LRCAP
You.
The LRCP will follow your TF to the full extent of its range, albeit with diminishing effectiveness.
This provides cover outside the 3 hex range of normal CAP.
RE: Dec 17, 1944 - large naval battle sequence
Posted: Sat Aug 23, 2014 1:19 pm
by topeverest
Thanks,
But we both know how hard it is to play the empire in late war. My hat it tipped to Admiral Kamikaze for his aggressive
style that keeps me very honest. That said, I agree that it was a low solution gambit on the empire's part.
ORIGINAL: BBfanboy
WOW! That was one horrific slaughter for the IJN! Six BBs and 2 CAs sunk and one more BB certain to follow! The Japanese
SC superiority just disappeared. You may have been lucky on your mistake, but he made a really big one, knowing you had your
buzz saw in the area. Well done! [&o][&o]

RE: Dec 17, 1944 - large naval battle sequence
Posted: Sat Aug 23, 2014 1:36 pm
by BBfanboy
Had another look at the combat reports from Dec. 16. There are a lot of A6M5 Zeros in the Townsville attack and not many in the BB CAP.
Makes me think he set a lot of them to LRCAP the BBs but the AI decided to escort the bombers instead. Nasty turn of luck if that is what happened.
RE: Dec 18, 1944 - All Quiet
Posted: Sat Aug 23, 2014 3:47 pm
by topeverest
Both sides appear to have had enough excitement for the time being. Note that Townsville is about to become a level 9 base.
Aside - gotta love level 9's because in our house rules, I need a level 9 to launch attack missions for 4E's. The 29's will do nicely a I bring them in over the next days.

RE: Dec 18, 1944 - net installment to Oz
Posted: Sat Aug 23, 2014 3:53 pm
by topeverest
Fleet should be aggregated by next turn at New Caledonia / Koumac. This will be the force that strikes south to Brisbane. note I am planning to land at townsville and move, as I don't want to consume AV in an amphibious invasion. What I am landing is more than strong enough to get to Brisbane in 2 months.

RE: Dec 18, 1944 - world map
Posted: Sat Aug 23, 2014 4:06 pm
by topeverest
following is a world map. The allies have concentrated all major combat efforts to secure the foothold in Oz. By the end of January, I will drop 2 more troop loads in Oz as described in the map, and then I will turn my transport power to move troops at Hawaii to Oz for staging. My next major amphibious offensive other than Oz probably wont be until about March.
I am open to other thoughts, keeping in mind our house rule that I have to take back oz (Sydney Melboure and Brisbane before going to the inner ring assets.

RE: Dec 18, 1944 - All Quiet
Posted: Sat Aug 23, 2014 5:04 pm
by witpqs
Aside - gotta love level 9's because in our house rules, I need a level 9 to launch attack missions for 4E's.
Are you kidding? [X(]
RE: Dec 18, 1944 - All Quiet
Posted: Sat Aug 23, 2014 7:27 pm
by topeverest
True,
But we upgraded SPS's across the map so that most whole land hex bases can make it to 6. We also added bases in gap areas
It works out OK, but it has the effect of slowing down the allied punch to a material degree. Empire has time to engage in operations to try
to thwart the 4e steamroller.
ORIGINAL: witpqs
Aside - gotta love level 9's because in our house rules, I need a level 9 to launch attack missions for 4E's.
Are you kidding? [X(]
RE: Dec 22, 1944 - Monthly sub losses
Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2014 10:47 pm
by topeverest
This is the part of the war the empire is doing the best. of course, late war empire ASW makes allied subs pay for kills.
Allied sub killed 10
empire kills - 20
E - 4
AP - 3
AK - 4
AKL - 2
TK - 4 (including 2 large)
AO - 1 (large)
SC - 2
damaged ships some of which will have sunk 17
I am keeping up the sub war and will burn my sub assets despite the loss ratio. I am staying at least 4 hexes out from Japan and can not longer interdict Fusan link, but I am getting losses at about 2 to 1. If it drops to one to one, I will have to change tactics.
As far as how those 10 subs have been lost, there is a definitive pattern. At Tsushima, at Rabaul, at Balikpapan, At Singapore. But I also am losing subs out in the deep. empire DD's are becoming quite effective in getting subs. my solution is to put two subs in each task force, and typically when one sub is hammered, the other gets an attack.
RE: Dec 22, 1944 - Net load to townsville
Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2014 10:52 pm
by topeverest
Here is the skinny on the next load...arrive in two game days, but doesn't look like it will be contested.

RE: Dec 22, 1944 -Air raid on Cairns
Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2014 10:57 pm
by topeverest
Empire pulled off a pretty successful CAP defense of CAIRNS this past turn. Saw some new things and I am scratching my head a bit. escorts were bypassed even though they weren't outnumbered.
This is one of those raids. Keep in mind I swept with two squadrons too. Pretty amazing given the pounding he has taken. I wonder how he did it, because I don't think it was luck.
I cant believe it was the initial bounce from 22K
orning Air attack on Cairns , at 92,140
Weather in hex: Heavy rain
Raid spotted at 36 NM, estimated altitude 16,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 15 minutes
Japanese aircraft
A6M5c Zero x 13
J2M5 Jack x 2
N1K2-J George x 13
Allied aircraft
F4U-1A Corsair x 24
SB2C-3 Helldiver x 59
TBM-1C Avenger x 57
Japanese aircraft losses
A6M5c Zero: 1 destroyed, 1 damaged
A6M5c Zero: 1 destroyed on ground
J2M5 Jack: 1 destroyed
N1K2-J George: 13 damaged
N1K2-J George: 2 destroyed on ground
Allied aircraft losses
SB2C-3 Helldiver: 3 destroyed, 3 damaged
SB2C-3 Helldiver: 1 destroyed by flak
TBM-1C Avenger: 3 destroyed, 2 damaged
Japanese Ships
MTB G-884, Bomb hits 1, and is sunk
Japanese ground losses:
6 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Airbase hits 7
Airbase supply hits 2
Runway hits 11
Port hits 11
Port fuel hits 2
Aircraft Attacking:
22 x SB2C-3 Helldiver releasing from 3000'
Port Attack: 1 x 1000 lb GP Bomb, 2 x 250 lb GP Bomb
52 x TBM-1C Avenger bombing from 11000 feet
Airfield Attack: 2 x 500 lb GP Bomb
29 x SB2C-3 Helldiver releasing from 2000'
Port Attack: 1 x 1000 lb GP Bomb, 2 x 250 lb GP Bomb
3 x SB2C-3 Helldiver releasing from 4000'
Port Attack: 1 x 1000 lb GP Bomb, 2 x 250 lb GP Bomb
CAP engaged:
Chiyoda-1 with A6M5c Zero (2 airborne, 0 on standby, 2 scrambling)
2 plane(s) intercepting now.
2 plane(s) not yet engaged, 0 being recalled, 0 out of immediate contact.
Group patrol altitude is 22000 , scrambling fighters between 11000 and 24000.
Time for all group planes to reach interception is 37 minutes
2 planes vectored on to bombers
19th Ku S-1 with N1K2-J George (0 airborne, 0 on standby, 0 scrambling)
1 plane(s) not yet engaged, 0 being recalled, 5 out of immediate contact.
Group patrol altitude is 22000 , scrambling fighters to 11000.
Time for all group planes to reach interception is 28 minutes
6 planes vectored on to bombers
32nd Ku S-1 with N1K2-J George (2 airborne, 0 on standby, 0 scrambling)
2 plane(s) intercepting now.
2 plane(s) not yet engaged, 0 being recalled, 0 out of immediate contact.
Group patrol altitude is 22000 , scrambling fighters to 11000.
Time for all group planes to reach interception is 15 minutes
4 planes vectored on to bombers
345 Ku S-2 with N1K2-J George (0 airborne, 0 on standby, 0 scrambling)
0 plane(s) not yet engaged, 0 being recalled, 3 out of immediate contact.
Group patrol altitude is 22000
Time for all group planes to reach interception is 25 minutes
3 planes vectored on to bombers
S-351 Hikotai with A6M5c Zero (1 airborne, 0 on standby, 5 scrambling)
1 plane(s) intercepting now.
0 plane(s) not yet engaged, 0 being recalled, 1 out of immediate contact.
Group patrol altitude is 22000 , scrambling fighters between 11000 and 25000.
Time for all group planes to reach interception is 32 minutes
7 planes vectored on to bombers
24th Ku S-1 with J2M5 Jack (2 airborne, 0 on standby, 0 scrambling)
2 plane(s) intercepting now.
Group patrol altitude is 22000
Raid is overhead
RE: Dec 22, 1944 -Losses
Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2014 11:00 pm
by topeverest
I feel like there is something else that describes his victory and I am not getting it. here are losses for entire day. 1 to 1 and I didn't have a sub in the attack hex, so lost a good number of pilots...oh well.

RE: Dec 22, 1944 -Losses
Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2014 11:04 pm
by topeverest
I guess I am going to have to sweep the hell out of these bases.
Dec 26, 1944 - second load at Townsville
Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2014 9:32 pm
by topeverest
The last few turns have been pretty uneventful. The allies pushed another large load of troops to Townsville and have generally expanded the foothold.
The empire fleet has shown up again, but only a SCTF. My opponent has a habit of trying to guess my range on the allied CV planes and then sit right outside it. This past turn, when his minor SCtF (mostly DD's) showed up, I did have 2 squadrons set to longer range. I did get a small whack at it and sunk 3 DD's, but the main empire force clearly will make its attack run this next turn.
Otherwise, the empire has had more air success in that losses have been about 2 to 1 in my favor. most of that is me committing some lower experience fighters in sweeping and one combat where his fighters must have achieved surprise, because my fighters were not engaged.
RE: Dec 26, 1944 - The Townsville area
Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2014 9:32 pm
by topeverest
AS you can see the empire sctf is approaching.
this turn I am
1. sending cruiser bb to Cairns and Rockhampton
2. paradropping to conclurry and normanton. Hope they are free.
3. consolidating my fleet atTownville and putting BB task force one hex to the north where he has to pass.
4. setting out 4 PT tf further out to ding him on all approach avenues to TV.
5. bombing Cairs with 4E
6. bombing a enemy hex with carrier and minor air
7. sweeping several Oz bases
8. preparing for load three to Oz

RE: Dec 26, 1944 - minor naval air combat results
Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2014 9:37 pm
by topeverest
Afternoon Air attack on TF, near Cooktown at 95,136
Weather in hex: Moderate rain
Raid detected at 80 NM, estimated altitude 17,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 34 minutes
Allied aircraft
SB2C-4 Helldiver x 30
Allied aircraft losses
SB2C-4 Helldiver: 2 damaged
SB2C-4 Helldiver: 1 destroyed by flak
Japanese Ships
DD Ume, Bomb hits 3, heavy fires, heavy damage
DD Giri #4, Bomb hits 2, heavy fires
DD Roiyaru #3
DD Wakaba
DD Bi #3
DD Satsukaze
DD Momo, Bomb hits 2, heavy fires, heavy damage
Aircraft Attacking:
6 x SB2C-4 Helldiver releasing from 4000'
Naval Attack: 1 x 1000 lb SAP Bomb, 2 x 250 lb SAP Bomb
19 x SB2C-4 Helldiver releasing from 2000'
Naval Attack: 1 x 1000 lb SAP Bomb, 2 x 250 lb SAP Bomb
5 x SB2C-4 Helldiver releasing from 3000'
Naval Attack: 1 x 1000 lb SAP Bomb, 2 x 250 lb SAP Bomb
Heavy smoke from fires obscuring DD Giri #4
Heavy smoke from fires obscuring DD Ume
Heavy smoke from fires obscuring DD Momo
RE: Dec 26, 1944 - minor naval air combat results
Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2014 11:05 pm
by BBfanboy
The three DDs hit look like the low value ASW ones - closer to a DE than a DD. That would not take much away from his bombardment plans but could make sub attacks more likely to get through.
RE: Dec 26, 1944 - minor naval air combat results
Posted: Sat Aug 30, 2014 12:09 am
by topeverest
Turns out he lost his nerve and retired those ships.
ORIGINAL: BBfanboy
The three DDs hit look like the low value ASW ones - closer to a DE than a DD. That would not take much away from his bombardment plans but could make sub attacks more likely to get through.
RE: Dec 27, 1944 - summary
Posted: Sat Aug 30, 2014 12:26 am
by topeverest
Fairly impactful turn, even if weather hemmed in allied air forces near Townsville.
