Page 6 of 7
Re: WW2 Grand Strategy Question SEA BASING - Pacific At War PO Version
Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2025 5:06 am
by larryfulkerson
Speaking of
Mindanao, this is what it looks like right now. I'm trying to hide all the
Coast Watchers in the mountains and to keep them split up so they aren't all caught in the same hex. Most of them are going to be caught by the Japs eventually.

- temp.png (1.11 MiB) Viewed 205 times
Re: WW2 Grand Strategy Question SEA BASING - Pacific At War PO Version
Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2025 4:55 pm
by larryfulkerson
Here's what the
Chinese are doing. The
Japs are out of supply in northern
China so the
Chinese are doing well. I'm the blue dots in this image. I still have partisans in
Saigon and
Bangkok.

- temp.png (2.08 MiB) Viewed 185 times
Re: WW2 Grand Strategy Question SEA BASING - Pacific At War PO Version
Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2025 6:24 pm
by larryfulkerson
I finally managed to wipe out the
Jap defenders at
Henderson Field on
Guadalcanal. Now to take
Tulagi. We're finally making progress.

- temp.png (209.42 KiB) Viewed 174 times
Re: WW2 Grand Strategy Question SEA BASING - Pacific At War PO Version
Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2025 4:37 am
by larryfulkerson
I think I may have found one of the
Jap carriers but the strange thing is that I've found more aircraft than can be carried by one
CV so I think this is a multiple
CV kind of unit or something. And there are other
TF's that I believe have some major class of ships like
BB's and maybe heavy
CA's. I broke out the
British CV's and sailed them out to south of
Java looking for
Jap ships and found some
Jap DD's, launched an attack and sunk them. Hooah.

- temp.png (1.24 MiB) Viewed 162 times
Re: WW2 Grand Strategy Question SEA BASING - Pacific At War PO Version
Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2025 5:12 am
by larryfulkerson
I thought I'd run the
Enterprise, Yorktown, and Lexington and their aircrews close enough to the
Japs to hit one of their stacks of ships to see if I can sink some of them in a raid, one strike and back out of there. I'll probably lose a lot of planes ( and pilots ) but it will be worth it if I can whittle down the strength of the
Jap fleet.

- temp.png (807.83 KiB) Viewed 159 times
Re: WW2 Grand Strategy Question SEA BASING - Pacific At War PO Version
Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2025 5:43 am
by larryfulkerson
I attacked with a
British bomber unit at minimum losses just to get a list of what is in the hex with those
Jap CV's and I hit the jackpot. There's
three carriers in the hex but there's over
200+ planes present and that's not something I'd care to tangle with right now. So I find it prudent to retire with those three
British CV's in range.

- temp.png (409.97 KiB) Viewed 156 times
Re: WW2 Grand Strategy Question SEA BASING - Pacific At War PO Version
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2025 3:43 am
by larryfulkerson
I was sailing eastward from
Colombo and discovered a couple of
Jap DD's minding their own business and attacked it with my
Stringbags and sunk both of them at a lost of
two aircraft. Those
British aircrews pulled it off again. A metal for all of them.

- temp.png (871.71 KiB) Viewed 124 times
Re: WW2 Grand Strategy Question SEA BASING - Pacific At War PO Version
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2025 3:47 am
by larryfulkerson
I attacked
Wake Island with a couple of
Marine units and I lost more than I anticipated. I needed more
ship support than was present. I won't make that mistake again.

- temp.png (329.79 KiB) Viewed 124 times
Re: WW2 Grand Strategy Question SEA BASING - Pacific At War PO Version
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2025 3:58 am
by larryfulkerson
I lost a hell of a lot of aircraft but I sank
20 Jap ships so maybe it's not that bad after all. I attacked with my three
American carriers (
Enterprise, Lexington, and Yorktown ) in addition to the
British CV Ramillies and now that the
Jap ships are gone I can pull back to safety.

- temp.png (523.14 KiB) Viewed 122 times
Re: WW2 Grand Strategy Question SEA BASING - Pacific At War PO Version
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2025 4:28 am
by larryfulkerson
This is the beginning of
T17 which is
March 25th of 1942. Springtime, time for some better weather. I've lost a lot of
Irregular Squads but I'm making a lot of them too. I'm down to my last
8 bazooka's and I'm not going to make more of them until
T50 whenever that is. I've decided to post another
zip file of the 'save game' action in case there might be somebody who wants a more in depth look at everything. Or to play the rest of the game from here.

- temp.png (1.31 MiB) Viewed 120 times
Re: WW2 Grand Strategy Question SEA BASING - Pacific At War PO Version
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2025 1:53 pm
by larryfulkerson
I drove the
Japs out of
Madang into the jungle so they are probably low on supply by now. The
Australians are tired but still in the fight. I need to get a squadron of fighters up here when I can. I hesitate because the
Japs are still adjacent to the airfield there and can inflict damage on anything in the hex and I love my airplanes more than to treat them like that. I'll get my
2 BB's in there to support the
4th and 5th AUS Regiments in fighting what amounts to a regiment with some
SNLF Jap troops mixed in.

- temp.png (1.77 MiB) Viewed 110 times
Re: WW2 Grand Strategy Question SEA BASING - Pacific At War PO Version
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2025 3:53 pm
by larryfulkerson
I think I've found most of the
Jap ships and I'm trying to think of a way to get the jump on the
Jap CV's at first and then the
BB's after that. Each turn the
Jap planes attack my ships and they lose a handful of planes and I usually lose nothing. So I'm using them as bait to whittle down the
Jap Air Force.

- temp.png (1.34 MiB) Viewed 102 times
Re: WW2 Grand Strategy Question SEA BASING - Pacific At War PO Version
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2025 4:27 pm
by larryfulkerson
I got attacked by a large
Jap SCTF that went after my little Subchaser and sank it but I was surprised by the amount of damage the
Japs got. It looks like several squadrons of my naval bombers sprang to the defense. None of the
TBD's were damaged so I surmise that they weren't within range and didn't take part in the attack. If we look at the Jap losses starting from the top: The
Yamato BB got
7% damage, a
Nagato class BB got
76% damage, I sank one of the
Yugumo-Kagero Class DD's and got
3% damage on a
Fuso Class BB, and it looks like
80% damage on an
Aoba/Furutaka Class CA. Plus a couple of
Jap aircraft. I'm thinking of attacking these ships next turn if my planes are rested enough.

- temp.png (1.61 MiB) Viewed 98 times
Re: WW2 Grand Strategy Question SEA BASING - Pacific At War PO Version
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2025 4:37 pm
by larryfulkerson
Port Moresby was hit by a medium size raid and lost nothing but the
Japs lost a handful of bombers but didn't include any fighter escorts so the fight was one sided. I think the
E13A Jake is a small float recon kind of plane and I assume the
Japs were using it as escort and they were battered.

- temp.png (582.39 KiB) Viewed 96 times
Re: WW2 Grand Strategy Question SEA BASING - Pacific At War PO Version
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2025 4:42 pm
by larryfulkerson
I neglected to move my
CV's out of range of
Jap land-based air power and as a result I got hit and suffered some significant damage. Both
CV's took damage and I lost a significant number of planes. This is what happens when you don't pay attention.

- temp.png (944.5 KiB) Viewed 95 times
Re: WW2 Grand Strategy Question SEA BASING - Pacific At War PO Version
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2025 3:46 am
by larryfulkerson
I found a naval unit that's almost useless in that it has no
AA strength and that's a killer in this environment. It has
5 DD's of two separate types:
4 Farragut/Mahan Class DD's and a single
Gleeves-Benson Class DD and only the last one has any
AA defense. The
Sumner Class DD and the
Fletcher Class DD both have
AA defense over 100+ but I won't get any of those until later in the game.

- temp.png (844.1 KiB) Viewed 77 times
Re: WW2 Grand Strategy Question SEA BASING - Pacific At War PO Version
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2025 3:59 am
by larryfulkerson
The
USS Colorado, a
BB, got hit by itself by
most of the Jap Naval Air Force and was lucky to get out of that situation with only
2/3 of it's strength missing. I've got it parked at
Brisbane and it looks like it's going to be there healing for the next
60 days or so. Maybe more. Too bad I can't sail the
CL Omaha by itself.

- temp.png (764.11 KiB) Viewed 76 times
Re: WW2 Grand Strategy Question SEA BASING - Pacific At War PO Version
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2025 4:39 am
by larryfulkerson
I've decided I want to track the growth in proficiency of this aircraft unit. So I'll leave this in my notes to remind me I'm monitoring it. It's
43% in T19 (
12Apr42 ).

- temp.png (1.83 MiB) Viewed 71 times
Re: WW2 Grand Strategy Question SEA BASING - Pacific At War PO Version
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2025 7:31 am
by larryfulkerson
I thought I'd do a save game and take a look at the
Jap side to see what the air losses are for the two sides. I notice that the aircraft most produced is the
A6M Reisen (early) Zero at
623 per turn. I gotta get that rate down somehow. That means I need more furballs in which I win. The
Japs don't have very many aircraft on-hand which is a good thing.

- temp.png (720.91 KiB) Viewed 66 times
Re: WW2 Grand Strategy Question SEA BASING - Pacific At War PO Version
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2025 8:29 pm
by larryfulkerson
After reducing
Tulagi I thought I'd show some love to
Bouganville and see if I can help the Army take down the island. I'm glad I captured an airfield so I can base bombers and fighters there. There's a boat load of
Jap aircraft around the
Rabaul area so I'm getting a lot of interference in my attacks and I need to back up everybody with a lot of
CAP to temper the
Jap aircraft effort.

- temp.png (306.11 KiB) Viewed 47 times