Page 6 of 6

RE: Virtual vs Real

Posted: Tue May 09, 2006 2:31 am
by CFL_FAN_7
Away jersey's

Image

RE: Virtual vs Real

Posted: Tue May 09, 2006 2:31 am
by CFL_FAN_7
Home

RE: Virtual vs Real

Posted: Thu Jun 01, 2006 11:02 pm
by CFL_FAN_7
I here the 9th CFL team might go to Windsor.

RE: Virtual vs Real

Posted: Sat Jun 24, 2006 4:39 am
by CFL_FAN_7
CFL update:
 
Winnipeg is looking good (1-1)
Argos (1-1) Ricky Williams hasn't had that hott of a game yet, no rush TD's either. 
 
 
Kerry Joseph can't earn the riders (0-1) a win agianst BC (1-0) last week, but in week 2 he has another chance.
 
Edmonton (1-0) vs Calgary (1-0) rivarly
 
Week 2 Montreal (o-1) vs Hamilton (looks prety solid) (0-1)

RE: Virtual vs Real

Posted: Sun Jul 23, 2006 3:48 am
by CFL_FAN_7
ANY1 watch N E CFL games?

RE: Sick CFL teams next year

Posted: Mon Jul 24, 2006 10:27 pm
by jrodsly
ORIGINAL: CFL_FAN_7

I tihnk these teams next year will be sick:

-Toronto Argonauts: signed SB Keith stokes (sick SB and returner)
ex-pro bowl NFL player linebacker Lee Woodall and defensive end Erik Flowers. another nfl player

*Stacking they're D-fence which was already amazing, maybe a possibly better run D next season with the new LB and DE (powering the sick D-line)

*Stokes not only add's to the special teams but also to the already strong recieving group in Toronto.

Conclusion

-Definetly playoffs, best in the East for sure
-Possible Grey cup visit and win (who ever beats them in the playoffs is a cinderella team lol)
-Definetly good depth


-Winniepeg Blue Bombers
SIgned:LB Barin Simpson**It'll change their whole Defense****The area where they lack in is LB core, Barin Simpson will definetly make a big impact on the Defense

Winnepeg already has a sick offense with QB Kevin Glen (hopefully wont get injured) and SB Milt Stegall and WR Chris Brazzell.Teey also have a deadly running game with the best RB in CFL RB Charles Roberts. secondary will do better thanks to a new coach who seems impressive. D seems nicer with 1 Lb a strong line (Gavin Walls and Tom Canada) and a decent secondary.

Conclusion

-In the run for playoffs, the can do better than calgary and saskatchewan, maybe B.C (depends on defense)
-The loss of Keith Stokes will affect them but they have a good replacement for him (don't remeber his name lol)
-Potential to be better then Edmonton (Montreal was ridged in the grey cup)
-Amazing in the air ground, decent against run, decent against pass
-Overall a playoff team

you like to use "sick", don't you?

RE: Sick CFL teams next year

Posted: Wed Jul 26, 2006 4:58 am
by CFL_FAN_7
yes lol

RE: Sick CFL teams next year

Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 1:37 am
by jrodsly
well stop!

RE: Sick CFL teams next year

Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 11:20 pm
by CFL_FAN_7
sorry, but i can't...theres nothing wrong with it.

RE: Sick CFL teams next year

Posted: Fri Jul 28, 2006 1:08 am
by jrodsly
i know. im just kidding. just don't say it too much.
 

RE: Sick CFL teams next year

Posted: Fri Jul 28, 2006 4:35 pm
by CFL_FAN_7
O..lol, you had me wondering there...lol

RE: Sick CFL teams next year

Posted: Sat Jul 29, 2006 9:04 pm
by CFL_FAN_7
Anyone see Winnipeg shut-out Hamilton

RE: Sick CFL teams next year

Posted: Sun Aug 27, 2006 7:06 pm
by CFL_FAN_7
OTTAWA IS COMING BACK TO THE CFL