Page 6 of 6

RE: Somewhat OT - The most beautiful warship (in your opinion)

Posted: Sat Apr 01, 2006 2:22 pm
by Apollo11
Hi all,
ORIGINAL: irrelevant

I love the 3rd generation USN CLs:

USS Juneau II

Image

Those were 5" guns - right?

Was their number (6 x 2 = 12) enough to justify such bigger ship (6000 tonns) than DD (since DD's usually carried 5")?


Leo "Apollo11"

RE: Somewhat OT - The most beautiful warship (in your opinion)

Posted: Sat Apr 01, 2006 7:16 pm
by Fornadan
Image

RE: Somewhat OT - The most beautiful warship (in your opinion)

Posted: Sat Apr 01, 2006 8:22 pm
by LargeSlowTarget
ORIGINAL: Apollo11

Hi all,

Those were 5" guns - right?

Was their number (6 x 2 = 12) enough to justify such bigger ship (6000 tonns) than DD (since DD's usually carried 5")?


Leo "Apollo11"

Most DDs carried only four or five 5" guns. The first batch of those AA cruisers carried 16 5" guns - imagine the ammo consumption. You need storage space for all those shells, hence the size. It is said those CLAAs were floating ammo dumps.

To get back to the original topic - I think the Atlanta class ships were the most beautiful warships.

Image

RE: Somewhat OT - The most beautiful warship (in your opinion)

Posted: Sat Apr 01, 2006 10:57 pm
by tsimmonds
Those were 5" guns - right?

Was their number (6 x 2 = 12) enough to justify such bigger ship (6000 tonns) than DD (since DD's usually carried 5")?
They also had two HA/LA fire control directors (DDs had only one). They could engage two targets--air or surface--simultaneously (one fore, one aft) with fully director controlled fire.

RE: Somewhat OT - The most beautiful warship (in your opinion)

Posted: Sun Apr 02, 2006 6:07 am
by Mike Scholl
ORIGINAL: irrelevant
Those were 5" guns - right?

Was their number (6 x 2 = 12) enough to justify such bigger ship (6000 tonns) than DD (since DD's usually carried 5")?
They also had two HA/LA fire control directors (DDs had only one). They could engage two targets--air or surface--simultaneously (one fore, one aft) with fully director controlled fire.

Actually the original Atlanta Design was for a ship more envisioned as tha Destroyer Leader than an AA Cruiser. Such features as being the only US Cruisers with TT's point this out. And the Navy admitted later that for a true AA Cruiser the best layout would have been 2 twins forward, 2 aft, 2 port, and 2 starboard---with 4 directors.

RE: Somewhat OT - The most beautiful warship (in your opinion)

Posted: Wed Apr 05, 2006 3:03 am
by rogueusmc
ORIGINAL: anarchyintheuk
...Battleaxe class - they just look right
there's just something about naming a warship after your mother in law...[:D]

RE: Somewhat OT - The most beautiful warship (in your opinion)

Posted: Wed Apr 05, 2006 3:17 am
by Graycompany
[&o] Olympia

Image

RE: Somewhat OT - The most beautiful warship (in your opinion)

Posted: Wed Apr 05, 2006 3:19 am
by Graycompany
Mug shot

Image

RE: Somewhat OT - The most beautiful warship (in your opinion)

Posted: Wed Apr 05, 2006 3:37 am
by barbarrossa
This one took me to war and brought my a** back safe and sound,

Image