Page 52 of 62
RE: AE Naval and OOB Issues
Posted: Wed Jul 14, 2010 11:59 pm
by treespider
ORIGINAL: JohnDillworth
Thanks,
my experience is that it happens somewhere between "most-times" and "always". Problem is LBA. I want to keep my carriers just outside of LBA and my opponent can always exploit this weakness and draw me in. Anyway to absolutely set the react range (4 hexs, not 1 hex more, ever!!!)?
thanks
No.
Where is, repeat, where is Task Force Thirty Four? The world wonders.
RE: AE Naval and OOB Issues
Posted: Thu Jul 15, 2010 6:16 am
by JeffroK
The react should be a max, with the variables at max-1, max-2 whatever.
Never more than max.
RE: AE Naval and OOB Issues
Posted: Thu Jul 15, 2010 6:55 am
by JeffroK
Back to the RAN, the long way
Grimsby Class Sloops
AE has Should be
9724 Swan Start 411206 Brisbane 411206 Melbourne/Burnie (Minesweeping in Bass Strait)
9725 Warrego 411206 Melbourne 411206 Melbourne/Burnie
9726 Yarra 411206 Aden 411225 Aden (On 411206 she was on patrol in the Red Sea, 25/12 may be a few days out)
River class Frigates Many of these had a long work up period if they were commissioned post-war.
11128 Barcoo 440315 delay? 440117 Sydney
11129 Barwon 460201 delay? 451210 Sydney
11130 Burdekin 440915 delay? 440627 Brisbane
11131 Diamantina 450615 delay? 450427 Maryborough
11132 Gascoyne 440115 delay? 431118 Sydney
11133 Hawkesbury 440915 delay? 440705 Sydney
11134 Lachlan 450315 delay? 450214 Sydney
11135 Macquarie 460115 delay? 451207 Sydney
11137 Condamine 460215 delay? 460222 Sydney
11136 Murchison 460115 delay? 451217 Brisbane
11138 Culgoa 460215 delay? 470401 Melbourne
Missed Shoalhaven 460502
County Class Heavy Cruisers
3211 Shropshire 430215 Aden 430904 Cape Town
3212 Australia 411215 Sydney 411206 Sydney (Under Refit/repair)
3213 Canberra 411206 TF 8431(Sydney) 411206 Sydney
These are pretty good except for Shropshire which was till an HMS at Chatham, England on 430215 before being refitted and given to the RAN and came via Cape Town, not the Med which was still a combat zone.
RE: AE Naval and OOB Issues
Posted: Thu Jul 15, 2010 7:35 am
by Sardaukar
About CV TF reaction, there arecouple of commanders with better Air rating than Halsey, they are just CV COs and thus not on TF CO list. But if you have those carriers in your TF, you can use them as TF Commanders. IIRC they are RAdm Sherman and RAdm Murray.
Neither has "insane" aggressivenes rating either, so they should stay better within your orders...[8D]
RE: AE Naval and OOB Issues
Posted: Thu Jul 15, 2010 7:53 am
by JeffroK
AE SETUP IRL SETUP RAN Light Cruisers
3235 Perth 411206 TF 8431(Sydney) 411206 Sydney (Edited)
3236 Hobart 411212 Aden 411206 Aden
3237 Adelaide 411206 TF 8432 (Pt Moresby) 411206 Pt Moresby
RAN Destroyers
3688 Stuart 411206 Melbourne 411206 Melbourne Under repair/refit
3689 Voyager 411206 Sydney 411206 Sydney Damaged
3690 Vampire 411206 TF Z 411206 TF Z
3691 Vendetta 411206 Singapore 411206 Singapore Immobile, needed Vampire to tow it to Perth.
3692 Quiberon 431215 Aden 430227 Cape Town (Actually Durban)
3693 Quickmatch 431215 Aden May 44 Indian Ocean Still checking.
3694 Arunta 420515 Cape Town 420517 Sydney Built in Sydney!!
3695 Warramunga 421215 Cape Town 421123 Sydney Built in Sydney!!
3697 Bataan 450615 Aden 450525 Sydney Built in Sydney!!
3729 Nepal 420812 Cape Town 420103 Aden
The following N Class arrived but were withdrawn in Jun 42 to escort a Malta convoy and returned to Aden in Sep 42
3728 Napier 420103 Aden 420103 Aden
3730 Nestor 420103 Aden 420103 Aden
3731 Nizam 420103 Aden 420103 Aden
3732 Norman 420202 Cape Town 420103 Aden
RAN Bathurst Class Minesweepers
4381 Kalgoorlie 420407 Brisbane 420407 Whyalla
4382 Tamworth 420208 Brisbane 420208 Maryborough
4383 Pirie 421010 Brisbane 421010 Whyalla
4384 Ararat 430616 Rockhampton 430616 Brisbane
4385 Armidale 420611 Hobart 420611 Sydney Sunk 421201
4386 Ballarat 411206 Singapore 411206 Darwin (Actually arrived 411208)Confirmed.
4387 Benalla 420415 Melbourne 430427 Melbourne
4388 Bowen 420815 Brisbane 421109 Brisbane
4389 Bunbury 411206 Townsville 430103 Brisbane
4390 Bundaberg 420912 Darwin 420912 Brisbane
4391 Cairns 411206 Darwin 420511 Maryborough
4392 Castlemaine 420415 Melbourne 420617 Melbourne
4393 Cessnock 420215 Sydney 420126 Sydney
4394 Colac 420106 Derby 420106 Sydney
4395 Cootamundra 420615 Sydney 430430 Sydney
4396 Cowra 420615 Blank?? 431008 (I cant find this either, checking)
4397 Deloraine 411206 Darwin 411206 Sydney
4398 Dubbo 420731 Townsville 420731 Sydney
4399 Echuca 420415 Blank?? 420907 Melbourne
4400 Fremantle 430324 Sydney 430324 Brisbane Both the ship & the fortress unit are spelt wrong
4401 Geelong 420515 Melbourne 420116 Melbourne
4402 Gladstone 420815 Melbourne 430322 Maryborough
4403 Glenelg 421116 Burnie 421116 Sydney
4404 Gympie 421104 Derby 421104 Brisbane
4405 Horsham 420515 Blank?? 421118 Melbourne
4406 Inverell 420917 Rockhampton 420917 Sydney
4407 Ipswich 411206 Darwin 420613 Brisbane Ship name spelt wrong.
4408 Junee 420615 Blank?? 440411 Sydney
4409 Kapunda 420715 Sydney 421021 Sydney
4410 Katoomba 420715 Sydney 411217 Sydney
4411 Kiama 440116 Sydney 440126 Brisbane
4412 Latrobe 411206 Perth 421106 Sydney
4413 Launceston 420115 Brisbane 420409 Brisbane
4414 Lismore 420115 Trincomalee 411216 Aden
4415 Lithgow 411206 Burnie 411206 Burnie (In Bass Strait area)
4416 Mildura 411206 Townsville 411206 On East Coast, checking.
4417 Parkes 440525 Melbourne 440525 Brisbane
4418 Rockhampton 420915 Melbourne 420121 Maryborough
4419 Shepparton 420615 Melbourne 430201 Melbourne
4420 Stawell 420715 Melbourne 430807 Melbourne
4421 Strahan 421015 Newcastle 440314 Newcastle
4422 Toowoomba 411206 Singapore 411206 Sydney (Confirmed)
4423 Townsville 411219 Cairns 411219 Brisbane
4424 Wagga 421218 Sydney 421218 Sydney
4425 Wallaroo 420815 Sydney 420715 Sydney
4426 Warrnambool 411206 Derby 411206 Burnie
4427 Whyalla 411206 Sydney 420108 Whyalla
4428 Wollongong 411206 Sydney 411206 Sydney
Missed Bathurst class
Bathurst 411216 Aden
Bendigo 411206 Singapore
Broome 420729 Brisbane
Burnie 411206 Singapore
Gawler 420814 Whyalla
Geraldton 420406 Sydney
Goulburn 411206 Singapore
Maryborough 411206 Singapore
RE: AE Naval and OOB Issues
Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2010 6:21 pm
by PzB74
After testing midget subs in my two Jap games I have had 30+ failed launches.
Not a single success!
Have others the same experience and should it be considered to raise the midgets chance to achieve success?
Not sure what the chance is today, but even if it was 10% it would require massive bad mojo not to achieve a single hit in 34 attempts.

RE: AE Naval and OOB Issues
Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2010 10:03 pm
by JeffroK
What % success should they achieve?
Against unprepared defences they achieved little, in AE where the Allies should be expecting them they should achieve less.
RE: AE Naval and OOB Issues
Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2010 10:37 pm
by PzB74
I suggest a 10-15% success rate.
As it is now they don't achieve anything. In real life they did achieve something;
1. Pearl Harbour: Photographic analysis conducted by the
United States Naval Institute in 1999 indicates one of the five
Ko-hyoteki-class submarines managed to enter Pearl Harbor, and successfully fired a torpedo into the
USS West Virginia
2. Diego Suarez Harbor: On 29 May 1942, two midget submarines, one of which managed to enter the Diego Suarez harbor and fired two torpedoes. One torpedo seriously damaged
battleship HMS Ramillies, while the second sank the oil tanker British Loyalty (6,993 tons).
3. Sydney Harbour: On the night of 31 May – 1 June, three
Ko-hyoteki class midget submarines, each with a two-member crew, entered Sydney Harbour, avoided the partially constructed
Sydney Harbour anti-submarine boom net, and attempted to sink Allied warships. After being detected and attacked, the crews of two of the midget submarines scuttled their boats and committed suicide without successfully engaging Allied vessels. The third submarine attempted to torpedo the heavy cruiser
USS Chicago, but instead sank the converted ferry
HMAS Kuttabul, killing 21 sailors.
These raids actually sank 3 vessels and damaged 2 battleships.
5 torpedo hits made by 10 midgets isn't a poor achievement if you ask me.
- In AE we can only dream about more than a lucky hit (and as I said, after ca 34 attempts I have none).
RE: AE Naval and OOB Issues
Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2010 10:45 pm
by witpqs
ORIGINAL: PzB
5 torpedo hits made by 10 midgets isn't a poor achievement if you ask me.
- In AE we can only dream about more than a lucky hit (and as I said, after ca 34 attempts I have none).
But that 10 midget subs doesn't include all the
failed attempts, does it? So it's not 5 torp hits for 10 subs, it's 5 torp hits for some much larger number of subs, yes?
RE: AE Naval and OOB Issues
Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2010 11:04 pm
by PzB74
All midgets referred to here are of the Ko-hyoteki class submarine.
According to Wiki fifty were built.
The first two, Ha-1 and Ha-2, were used only in testing. They did not have conning towers, which were added to the later boats for stability underwater.
Ha-19 was launched by I-24 at Pearl Harbor. Most of the other fifty are unaccounted for, although three were captured in Sydney (Australia), and others in Guam, Guadalcanal, and Kiska Island, accounting for some of the other hull numbers.
I have no idea how many of the 48 midgets that were built were actually launched.
If anyone know about other missions than the 3 that are listed here it would be easy to calculate how many hits were achieved per midget launched.
For simplicity you can divide 5 hits between 20 and 30 midgets. I doubt more than 20 were launched.
Since one sub achieved hits on 2 ships it becomes a bit difficult, such a double success is not possible in AE, so we can count this one double success as 2 hits.
Even if you divide 30 by 5 you will get 6 which is 20%.
The success rate should therefore be ca 15% if you ask me. If only 10, 12 or 15 midgets were launched the rate could actually be higher, but not much lower since we're calculating from a low end.
- It would also be possible to include a slightly increased success ratio throughout the first few months of the war to indicate Allied lack of readiness.
If no changes are made to the midgets in AE they may just as well be removed for all the good they will do.
RE: AE Naval and OOB Issues
Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2010 11:36 pm
by Don Bowen
ORIGINAL: JeffK
AE SETUP IRL SETUP RAN Light Cruisers
3235 Perth 411206 TF 8431(Sydney) 411206 Auckland (Still checking this, she was on tour)
3236 Hobart 411212 Aden I cant be sure, she was in the IO in Jan42 so 411212 may be correct.
3237 Adelaide 411206 TF 8432 (Pt Moresby) 411206 Still checking
....
Just off the top of my head, I know that Adelaide was at Port Moresby, having just escorted a lone transport there. She was ordered to Darwin.
Hobart was in the Med, but left for the Pacific immediately after war began in the Pacific. She departed Aden on the 13th.
Perth, along with Australia and Canberra, was assigned convoy escort duties in Australian/Indian Ocean waters. One of these three (Australia I think) was enroute Sydney from somewhere in Africa. The other two at Sydney??
RE: AE Naval and OOB Issues
Posted: Sat Jul 17, 2010 2:44 am
by JeffroK
ORIGINAL: Don Bowen
ORIGINAL: JeffK
AE SETUP IRL SETUP RAN Light Cruisers
3235 Perth 411206 TF 8431(Sydney) 411206 Auckland (Still checking this, she was on tour)
3236 Hobart 411212 Aden I cant be sure, she was in the IO in Jan42 so 411212 may be correct.
3237 Adelaide 411206 TF 8432 (Pt Moresby) 411206 Still checking
....
Just off the top of my head, I know that Adelaide was at Port Moresby, having just escorted a lone transport there. She was ordered to Darwin.
Hobart was in the Med, but left for the Pacific immediately after war began in the Pacific. She departed Aden on the 13th.
Perth, along with Australia and Canberra, was assigned convoy escort duties in Australian/Indian Ocean waters. One of these three (Australia I think) was enroute Sydney from somewhere in Africa. The other two at Sydney??
Hi Don, I agree with
Adelaide, some info said she was on convoy duty on the East Coast, no detail but I have since found a few sources which place her at Pt Moresby.
Perth data on the RAN site and the
HMAS Perth site
http://www.hmasperth.asn.au/Perth_1.html say
After completion of her refit on 22 November PERTH was engaged in exercises from 24 to 30 November and then sailed for Auckland. She carried out patrols, escort duties, exercises and manoeuvres during December 1941 and January 1942, visiting New Caledonia and New Guinea.
I'm trying to find a more detailed history which might say where she was when war was declared (remember, that was 8 Dec 41 Australian Time)
Hobart seems to be OK in AE.
Australia in the RAN site has
After a period escorting convoys to Freetown, Durban, Suez and Colombo, Australia (II) finally arrived back in Sydney on 24 March 1941. Between April and November the ship was on duty in the Indian Ocean and on 6 November carried out a reconnaissance of the Crozet Islands. She returned to Sydney in December and became Flagship of the Australian Squadron and two months later, in February 1942, Flagship of ANZAC Squadron, having Noumea as its operational base.
The Official RAN History says she was between Simonstown (Cape Town) & Sydney.
The HMAS Canberra website says
When war broke out with Japan on 8 December 1941, CANBERRA was berthed in Sydney Harbour with more than 175,000 miles of war time operational steaming to her credit.
which is identical to the RAN site.
RE: AE Naval and OOB Issues
Posted: Sat Jul 17, 2010 9:35 am
by Andrew Brown
The Official RAN History says she was between Simonstown (Cape Town) & Sydney.
I seem to recall that HMAS Australia reached Perth after the start of hostilities, before moving on to Sydney, which means she would have been somewhere in the Indian Ocean at start. But I can't remember where I saw that (I thought it was in the official history?).
Andrew
RE: AE Naval and OOB Issues
Posted: Sat Jul 17, 2010 10:47 am
by Don Bowen
My best information is that Perth was in harbor at Sydney when war began (along with Canberra). The two exercised off Sydney (with Le Triomphant) for a couple of days and then sailed toward Suva to excort the Pensacola convoy.
RE: AE Naval and OOB Issues
Posted: Sat Jul 17, 2010 10:34 pm
by JeffroK
[font="arial"]From http://www.perthone.com/1aust42.htm
PERTH left for Melbourne on 26th November and then escorted the liner MARIPOSA from mid Tasman to Sydney. On 8th December (EST) war was declared on Japan. PERTH patrolled the Tasman with CANBERRA and after calling at Brisbane, both ships sailed for New Caledonia arriving off there on the 18th December. After escorting a convoy to Brisbane both ships returned to Sydney.[/font]
From
http://www.naval-history.net/xGM-Chrono-06CL-Perth.htm
I think my first placement of Auckland is wrong by 12 mths.
July EXPORTER deployment to support military operations in continuation.
7th Bombarded Vichy shore battery at Abney, Damour.
Took passage to Alexandria and bombed by RAF aircraft without damage.
12th Whilst at Alexandria nominated for return to RAN service following Japanese threat
of attacks.
18th Sailed from Alexandria for passage to Sydney.
August On passage.
12th Rejoined RAN and taken in hand for refit.
September Under refit.
to
November
December Post refit trials.
8th Deployed with HM Australian Cruiser CANBERRA for patrol in Tasman Sea.
12th Escorted US troop convoy with HMAS CANBERRA for final part of passage to Australia.
19th Escorted US troop convoy to New Caledonia with HMAS CANBERRA and
HM New Zealand Cruiser ACHILLES.
22nd Return passage to Sydney with HMAS CANBERRA and HMNZS ACHILLES.
29th Escorted military convoy ZK5 from Sydney to Port Moresby, New Guinea with
HMAS AUSTRALIA, HMAS CANBERRA, HMNZS ACHILLES and two RAN
Sloops.
RE: AE Naval and OOB Issues
Posted: Sat Jul 17, 2010 10:39 pm
by Don Bowen
ORIGINAL: JeffK
[font="arial"]From http://www.perthone.com/1aust42.htm
PERTH left for Melbourne on 26th November and then escorted the liner MARIPOSA from mid Tasman to Sydney. On 8th December (EST) war was declared on Japan. PERTH patrolled the Tasman with CANBERRA and after calling at Brisbane, both ships sailed for New Caledonia arriving off there on the 18th December. After escorting a convoy to Brisbane both ships returned to Sydney.[/font]
Doesn't disagree with my information at all. The two cruisers met the Pensacola convoy at sea somewhere around/south of New Caledonia and escorted it to Australia. One of the Neq Zealand pair was involved as well.
Checked all I can - I am convinced that Sydney is the correct location for
Perth as of scenario start.
RE: AE Naval and OOB Issues
Posted: Sat Jul 17, 2010 10:45 pm
by JeffroK
ORIGINAL: Don Bowen
ORIGINAL: JeffK
[font="arial"]From http://www.perthone.com/1aust42.htm
PERTH left for Melbourne on 26th November and then escorted the liner MARIPOSA from mid Tasman to Sydney. On 8th December (EST) war was declared on Japan. PERTH patrolled the Tasman with CANBERRA and after calling at Brisbane, both ships sailed for New Caledonia arriving off there on the 18th December. After escorting a convoy to Brisbane both ships returned to Sydney.[/font]
Doesn't disagree with my information at all. The two cruisers met the Pensacola convoy at sea somewhere around/south of New Caledonia and escorted it to Australia. One of the Neq Zealand pair was involved as well.
Checked all I can - I am convinced that Sydney is the correct location for
Perth as of scenario start.
Yep, I looked at a few more points and found that in Nov 40, Perth was around NZ, eiher my first info was wrong or I cant type[:D]
RE: AE Naval and OOB Issues
Posted: Sat Jul 17, 2010 10:47 pm
by JeffroK
Have you seen this.
http://www.naval-history.net
RE: AE Naval and OOB Issues
Posted: Sat Jul 17, 2010 11:46 pm
by Don Bowen
Yes. Don Kindle has kindly provided some additional data not on the web site for Da Babes.
RE: AE Naval and OOB Issues
Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2010 8:50 am
by JeffroK
Next quiz is about HMAS' Ballarat & Toowoomba. (Bathurst Class)
Many references place them at Singapore at the outbreak of war (including naval-history.net), others have them in OZ though they were earmarked to escort convoys heading to Singapore. (Ballarat was only 1-2 out of arriving in Darwim, the Toowoomba was in Sydney.)