RE: 5-6 Oct 43
Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2018 10:14 pm
7 carriers and only 2 CLAAs and 7 DDs escorts, it is vulnerable to a surface TF attack or airstrike with no heavy units to be the bomb catch.
What's your Strategy?
https://forums.matrixgames.com:443/
ORIGINAL: Bif1961
7 carriers and only 2 CLAAs and 7 DDs escorts, it is vulnerable to a surface TF attack or airstrike with no heavy units to be the bomb catch.
ORIGINAL: jwolf
Other than that CV TF, does he have enough other CVs to pose a serious threat in the Andaman area?

ORIGINAL: jwolf
In Harm's Way is a great movie, one I really love to watch. Here's to hoping you are victorious as John Wayne was, though hopefully not as badly banged up, to say nothing of losing your flagship!
Ground combat at Chungking (76,45)
Japanese Deliberate attack
Attacking force 128108 troops, 1383 guns, 1615 vehicles, Assault Value = 3895
Defending force 132703 troops, 443 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 3160
Japanese engineers reduce fortifications to 4
Japanese adjusted assault: 5443
Allied adjusted defense: 9463
Japanese assault odds: 1 to 2 (fort level 4)
Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), forts(+), preparation(-), experience(-)
supply(-)
Attacker:
Japanese ground losses:
16237 casualties reported
Squads: 42 destroyed, 1012 disabled
Non Combat: 112 destroyed, 237 disabled
Engineers: 176 destroyed, 178 disabled
Guns lost 68 (1 destroyed, 67 disabled)
Vehicles lost 295 (38 destroyed, 257 disabled)
Units destroyed 1
Allied ground losses:
4650 casualties reported
Squads: 15 destroyed, 241 disabled
Non Combat: 22 destroyed, 133 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 7 disabled
Guns lost 28 (2 destroyed, 26 disabled)
Units destroyed 1

So now [subs are] hitting DDs and missing capital ships!!!


ORIGINAL: jwolf
Considering what L_S_T has had to bear at Chungking, you really don't have grounds for complaint at Taung Gyi. [:'(] But overall this looks like good, steady progress as the slowly increasing weight of Allied power takes control here and there.
I have to admit I have been surprised at how quiet the Japanese carriers have been ever since your critical defeat in the IO. I wonder if his carrier plane losses were higher than you thought (or at least, higher than I thought).




Half the bombers will switch to hitting the port in an attempt to suppress the CD batteries.
I am not so sure it is because of the port attack that the CD guns were targeted. I have used Ground Attack quite often to target LCUs in a base and they do attack the Naval Fortress as a priority. After that the unit with the highest AV seems to be most targeted. So that makes me think that the Squadron Commander used initiative to change from Port Attack to Ground Attack to hit the most dangerous unit he saw - the CD Unit or Naval Fort.ORIGINAL: jwolf
Half the bombers will switch to hitting the port in an attempt to suppress the CD batteries.
Dumb and/or rookie question -- did not know this -- attacking the port will also target the CD guns?
Also, given how tough, apparently, Ponape is, would it make sense to bypass it? What can you do with Ponape that you couldn't do better with, say, Kavieng?