Page 56 of 106

RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back.

Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2016 4:18 pm
by AllenK
Mig-3 will have a go, thanks.

RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back.

Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2016 4:23 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
The new Mig-3 was good, but not as good as Bf109 E-7.

Image

RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back.

Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2016 4:24 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
Moscow is going to be attacked.

Image

RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back.

Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2016 4:25 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
Stupid bombers [:(] Disorganized ARM would have made my attack automatic...

Image

RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back.

Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2016 5:13 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
Attack in Moscow is +13, Germany gambles with engineers life and don't use Rommel as attacking HQ support. Rommel has other things to do later this impulse.

In south USSR ARM faces few German tanks. Do USSR want to fly any planes as ground support? Italian FTR is in intercept range.

Image

RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back.

Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2016 5:15 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
I forgot to mention before attacks:

Germany rails Munich MIL to Kerch and INF from Finland to Tula.

RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back.

Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2016 5:17 pm
by AllenK
Il-4 escorted by Ftr, thanks.

RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back.

Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2016 5:21 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
Italians...

Where do USSR planes want to land?

Image

RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back.

Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2016 5:32 pm
by AllenK
Back where they came from, thanks.

RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back.

Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2016 5:39 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
Is it assault in Moscow?

Image

RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back.

Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2016 5:44 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
Is south combat did not go quite as planned but both USSR units were destroyed because there were no valid hexes to retreat.

Image

RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back.

Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2016 5:48 pm
by AllenK
Assault in Moscow, thanks.

RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back.

Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2016 5:53 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
Moscow is no problem.

Image

RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back.

Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2016 6:02 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
Germany rebases FTR3 from northern front to south.

Japan rebases FTR from China to Manchuria and another FTR rebases in Japan.

Here is situation in south after Axis impulse.

Back to Allies.

Image

RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back.

Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2016 6:04 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
Northern front

Image

RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back.

Posted: Sat Jan 09, 2016 8:49 am
by AllenK
M/J 41 Allied 2

No DoW

CW & France, Naval. USSR & China, Land. US Combined.

A-22, Hampden and Beaufighter to Italian Coast 3-box.

Various escorts sail out from Gib into Cape St Vincent. I assume Mayhemizer would not want to intercept them with the Italian sub in the 3-box. Other escorts sail out from Liverpool and Halifax. A strong task force sails from Gib to the West Med. Do the Italians wish to intercept?





Image

RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back.

Posted: Sat Jan 09, 2016 9:04 am
by Mayhemizer_slith
Yes please.

RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back.

Posted: Sat Jan 09, 2016 9:36 am
by AllenK
On a 2, the intercept succeeds. The RN elect to fight through from the 1-box.

The Italian G.50 fighter can make the 1-box. Does it want to fly?

RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back.

Posted: Sat Jan 09, 2016 9:58 am
by Mayhemizer_slith
I have question before I can answer: Do Italian FTR find enemies from box 1 if I fly it? Axis rolled 2 and there is CW CP in the sea area. If it finds enemy without rolling again it will fly to box 1.

RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back.

Posted: Sat Jan 09, 2016 10:00 am
by AllenK
I think it probably does. I'll give it a try. If it doesn't work out, I'll redo the move.