Page 56 of 74

RE: P-38

Posted: Sun Jul 09, 2006 6:07 pm
by Sneer
you gave me petropavlovsk on map  - thanks :-)
or isd it result of diplomatic arrangements ?

RE: P-38

Posted: Sun Jul 09, 2006 6:19 pm
by Nemo121
In my AAR I think I've shown that Allied planes appearing in reinforcement squadrons do NOT get drawn from the replacement pool. They are in addition to the replacement pool. The reason I am sure of this is that in several Allied plane categories I have destroyed more planes than the Allies get as of December 7th + replacements.

RE: P-38

Posted: Sun Jul 09, 2006 6:28 pm
by Sneer
hmmm
it means 950 planes till that moment -570 shot down = 5 groups filled and nothing in pool - i will live it ... this time :-)

RE: P-38

Posted: Mon Jul 10, 2006 8:21 am
by Raverdave
ORIGINAL: Sneer

you gave me petropavlovsk on mapĀ  - thanks :-)
or isd it result of diplomatic arrangements ?

Well the map shows what is possible if your didn't have such a yellow streak paint on your back. [;)]


(Mental note to self.....sack the cartographer)

RE: P-38

Posted: Mon Jul 10, 2006 8:46 am
by Sneer
russian fear mighty empire

we are back on track folks - i'm i really good disposition after weekend i'm thinking only about offensive movements 
why the hell we are in 43 - no fun in japanese offensives[;)]

RE: P-38

Posted: Mon Jul 10, 2006 9:22 am
by Raverdave
Offensive as much as you like.  [8D]

RE: P-38

Posted: Mon Jul 10, 2006 1:19 pm
by Sneer
offensive [;)] yes
today 6/16/43 imperial naval infantry attacked Merauke with support from naval bombers
enemy forces took this base ap 2 weeks ago with forces estimated as half australian 3rd bde
today after short resistance they surrendered to imperial forces !

1600+ soldiers captured

RE: P-38

Posted: Mon Jul 10, 2006 1:34 pm
by Sneer
looking closer to map i see both okha and vladivostock in imperial hands too
diplomats enroute to set this agreement and discuss allied participation in Russian campaign
a lot of sake for our bravest soldiers

RE: P-38

Posted: Mon Jul 10, 2006 3:09 pm
by Sneer
deleted -missed threads

RE: P-38

Posted: Mon Jul 10, 2006 3:25 pm
by Sneer
deleted - i don't understand what i see here - write in one AAR and find text in mine [8|]
it is too hot maybe that's the reason

RE: P-38

Posted: Tue Jul 11, 2006 6:43 am
by Raverdave
Bah.....how could it ever get "too hot" any where in your part of the world?

RE: P-38

Posted: Tue Jul 11, 2006 6:48 am
by Sneer
if you are hidden from the sun and still have 32-34 C temperature ..... I call this too hot
especially i played football in full sun yesterday and it is quite difficult

For australians central europe is a place where white bears walk :-)

RE: P-38

Posted: Tue Jul 11, 2006 7:31 am
by Raverdave
Ha ! 32-34 C is perfect weather.......it's when it starts getting to 43-45 that it gets "difficult". You are too soft.[;)]

RE: P-38

Posted: Tue Jul 11, 2006 7:43 am
by Sneer
yesterday during footbal there was 40+ in the sun - this is not for me 

(un)expected allied offensive will start at ....

Posted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 11:37 am
by Sneer
...Perth
30+ units spotted by 2-day recon from glens- few months of heavy activity of transport convoys south of Perth
numerous radio transmisions in area
so timor/java area will be under fire - maybe even soon[:)]
 

RE: (un)expected allied offensive will start at ....

Posted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 12:51 pm
by Raverdave
Well of course there are 30+ units in Perth....how else do you think I have been getting troops to Darwin?

RE: (un)expected allied offensive will start at ....

Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 3:21 am
by Raverdave
Actually yes you are right...I am going to attack Java and Timor soon.

RE: P-38

Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 9:28 am
by Sneer
chungking assault result in a few hours
here troops used and their supply status

Image

RE: P-38

Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 10:26 am
by veji1
may the gods of WITP ground combat be with you.

RE: P-38

Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 12:55 pm
by Raverdave
Pfffft !