Page 570 of 788
RE: Sturm und drang
Posted: Fri Apr 05, 2013 11:58 am
by Chickenboy
ORIGINAL: Crackaces
I did not know it took that long!
Yes. If you note the date they were destroyed, the Arries COULD be bringing some of them back right about now, had they bought them out a year ago (when they were destroyed). I'm not saying that's Arried oversight though...

RE: Sturm und drang
Posted: Fri Apr 05, 2013 12:04 pm
by Cap Mandrake
*********War of the Pacific, March 27, 1879, Valaparaiso, Chile***********
Zemeriah M. Minderbinder, in a fine silk shirt: Look, Mr. Foreign Minister, Chile could solve its foreign currency crisis just by taking back the nitrate mines from the crazy sons of bitches, the Bolivians. All you need to do is send the Armada up there and blockade the place.
Alejandro Fierro, Chilean Foreign Minsiter: My dear senor Minderbinder, there is the small matter of the Marina de Guerra del Peru. As you know, they are allied with the crazy sons of bitches, the Bolivians. Their broadside ironclad Independencia is quite a threat.
Zemeriah M. Minderbinder, in a fine silk shirt: Phht, Independencia! Her armor is really flattened anchovy tins. Blanco Encaldo will tear her to shreds.
Alejandro Fierro, Chilean Foreign Minsiter: <chuckles> Young man, our admirals do not share your confidence. How is it you know so much about Independencia?
Zemeriah M. Minderbinder, in a fine silk shirt: I sold her to them.
RE: Sturm und drang
Posted: Fri Apr 05, 2013 12:09 pm
by Cap Mandrake
Huascar vs *#&$$*#@
Cochrane

RE: Sturm und drang
Posted: Fri Apr 05, 2013 12:13 pm
by Cap Mandrake
ORIGINAL: Chickenboy
ORIGINAL: Crackaces
I did not know it took that long!
Yes. If you note the date they were destroyed, the Arries COULD be bringing some of them back right about now, had they bought them out a year ago (when they were destroyed). I'm not saying that's Arried oversight though...
Look, you can't call it "oversight" if you don't even know about it. That's just simple ignorance.
We may be ignorant but we ain't stupid.
RE: Sturm und drang
Posted: Fri Apr 05, 2013 12:17 pm
by MateDow
Wow, the rare naval knowledge displayed on this thread.
Not often on a WW2 site will see posts about ironclad warships.
RE: Sturm und drang
Posted: Fri Apr 05, 2013 12:27 pm
by Cap Mandrake
******************March 27, 2013, La Paz, Bolivia****************
M. Minderbinder IV, in fine Savile Row suit: Look Mr. President, it was a crime really. How was your side supposed to know the Peruvian naval armor was really flattened anchovy cans? What I propose is that we take the Bolivian case to the International Court in the Hague. It is not fair that Bolivia is landlocked.
President Morales: But it was 134 years ago? And where is this Hague place?
M. Minderbinder IV, in fine Savile Row suit: That's why we have Dewey, Cheatham and Howe, Mr. President. Let us take care of that.
President Morales: What will you desire in return?
M. Minderbinder IV, in fine Savile Row suit: 50% natural gas pipeline royalties, should we prevail, of course. We sell the gas to the Japs.
RE: Sturm und drang
Posted: Fri Apr 05, 2013 12:40 pm
by Cap Mandrake
Just in case there are doubters...

RE: Sturm und drang
Posted: Fri Apr 05, 2013 1:31 pm
by Chickenboy
Texas v. Spain?

[&:]

RE: Sturm und drang
Posted: Fri Apr 05, 2013 1:33 pm
by Chickenboy
ORIGINAL: Cap Mandrake
Look, you can't call it "oversight" if you don't even know about it. That's just simple ignorance.
We may be ignorant but we ain't stupid.
Would it help if I said that this is in the manual? [:'(]
RE: Sturm und drang
Posted: Fri Apr 05, 2013 1:39 pm
by witpqs
ORIGINAL: Cap Mandrake
ORIGINAL: Chickenboy
ORIGINAL: Crackaces
I did not know it took that long!
Yes. If you note the date they were destroyed, the Arries COULD be bringing some of them back right about now, had they bought them out a year ago (when they were destroyed). I'm not saying that's Arried oversight though...
Look, you can't call it "oversight" if you don't even know about it. That's just simple ignorance.
We may be ignorant but we ain't stupid.
I suggested it at the time. I think you and Sprior wanted to, but Churchill objected. Yeah, that's the ticket...
RE: Sturm und drang
Posted: Fri Apr 05, 2013 3:32 pm
by sprior
Actually Cochrane is the personality upon whom Jack Aubrey is built.
O'Brian was a bit of a fantasist and not a very nice bloke the books are gems of language and wit.
Why is it called a dog watch?
Because it's cur-tailed.
A corker
RE: Sturm und drang
Posted: Fri Apr 05, 2013 3:35 pm
by sprior
I suggested it at the time.
The management reserves the right to be infallible. Has anyone else invaded the Philippines and Burma in March 1943? I think not.
RE: Sturm und drang
Posted: Fri Apr 05, 2013 3:37 pm
by sprior
Wow, the rare naval knowledge displayed on this thread.
Rare as in underdone?
RE: Sturm und drang
Posted: Fri Apr 05, 2013 3:57 pm
by Crackaces
Has anyone else invaded the Has anyone else invaded the Philippines and Burma in March 1943?
I think the emphasis is on the Philippines and scenario #2, while also invading Burma, which I admit is quite remarkable against competent opponents. As far as Burma in its own context .. CR right now has Ramree Island in 1942 [;)]
RE: Sturm und drang
Posted: Fri Apr 05, 2013 3:58 pm
by Crackaces
ORIGINAL: sprior
Wow, the rare naval knowledge displayed on this thread.
Rare as in underdone?
Rare as in just right .. [;)]
RE: Sturm und drang
Posted: Fri Apr 05, 2013 4:31 pm
by sprior
Herpes not as badly off as some would wish.

RE: Sturm und drang
Posted: Fri Apr 05, 2013 5:04 pm
by Cap Mandrake
ORIGINAL: sprior
Herpes not as badly off as some would wish.
Santa Maria! The old gal can take it! Huzzah! Of course, the subs might be a problem.....and the airplanes too...and.....
RE: Sturm und drang
Posted: Fri Apr 05, 2013 5:08 pm
by Chickenboy
ORIGINAL: sprior
Herpes not as badly off as some would wish.
Impressive. There are very few ships that can take 3 TTs and remain afloat. [&o]
RE: Sturm und drang
Posted: Fri Apr 05, 2013 5:09 pm
by Chickenboy
ORIGINAL: sprior
I suggested it at the time.
The management reserves the right to be infallible. Has anyone else invaded the Philippines and Burma in March 1943? I think not.
Sure. It cost them 4 carriers and...wait a minute....
RE: Sturm und drang
Posted: Fri Apr 05, 2013 5:29 pm
by Cap Mandrake
No doubt about it. Hermes can take more punishment than the USN CVE's which are floating gas tanks. Even with 3 "up the chuff" she can make 11 kts.
I think that is even FASTER than her speed before battle. Evidently the water flows in one hole and out the other, therby reducing drag.