Page 7 of 8
RE: Ugliest Bomber of WWII
Posted: Mon Jun 08, 2009 1:44 pm
by DivePac88
This Russian flying fortress 'takes the cake' I think. [:D]

RE: Ugliest Bomber of WWII
Posted: Mon Jun 08, 2009 1:57 pm
by rtrapasso
ORIGINAL: DivePac88
This Russian flying fortress 'takes the cake' I think. [:D]
What the heck is this thing??? [X(]
EDIT: Ah, the K-7 Bomber... i wonder what K-1 through K-6 looked like, since they've obviously achieved perfection here... [:D]
RE: Ugliest Bomber of WWII
Posted: Mon Jun 08, 2009 2:01 pm
by rtrapasso
i like this view of it, although now i am pretty sure the whole thing is a spoof:

RE: Ugliest Bomber of WWII
Posted: Mon Jun 08, 2009 2:04 pm
by DivePac88
Here is one in action with a Nazi saucer. [;)]

RE: Ugliest Bomber of WWII
Posted: Mon Jun 08, 2009 2:05 pm
by rtrapasso
Well, there is a K-7 bomber/transport entry in Wikipedia... if you can believe it - only one built, and it crashed... so the photo above is an exercise in creative computer graphics... here is supposed to be a real picture, though:
EDIT: Not visible here is a 7th "pusher" engine on the trailing wing (although some sources say there were 2 additional engines)... i kinda like the idea of a 7-engined plane... the prototype supposedly crashed after structural failure of one of the tail booms... 2 more prototypes were never completed.
RE: Ugliest Bomber of WWII
Posted: Mon Jun 08, 2009 2:06 pm
by DivePac88
Here is the real K-7.

RE: Ugliest Bomber of WWII
Posted: Mon Jun 08, 2009 2:08 pm
by DivePac88
And here is a plan.

RE: Ugliest Bomber of WWII
Posted: Mon Jun 08, 2009 2:09 pm
by Mynok
You do have to admire the triple 16" turret on that fake beast though! [:'(]
RE: Ugliest Bomber of WWII
Posted: Mon Jun 08, 2009 2:47 pm
by DuckofTindalos
ORIGINAL: timtom
Honourable mention to the Blen IV (Bolingbroke this one, but hey...).
...but dang the B-10 hit must'a hit every branch falling out of the ugly tree.
Compared to some, the Blenheim was a beautiful airplane...
RE: Ugliest Bomber of WWII
Posted: Mon Jun 08, 2009 4:36 pm
by Dili
Bombers were not designed or built to be pretty, or win awards, they were built do a job, don't care how ugly it was, if it got you to the target, let you hit the target and then get you back home, you didn't care how ugly it was
I don't remind any real* ugly plane that was successful.
*that a large majority says so.
RE: Ugliest Bomber of WWII
Posted: Mon Jun 08, 2009 5:14 pm
by Nikademus
Being built ugly can help spoil the aim of AA gunners. [:D]
RE: Ugliest Bomber of WWII
Posted: Mon Jun 08, 2009 5:25 pm
by R8J
I disagree. She's cute.
RE: Ugliest Bomber of WWII
Posted: Mon Jun 08, 2009 5:35 pm
by pasternakski
ORIGINAL: R8J
I disagree. She's cute.
Well, I guess, in sort of a big-boned, hammer-swingin', Stalinist-era worker kinda way.
Do Svidaniya, big boy!
RE: Ugliest Bomber of WWII
Posted: Mon Jun 08, 2009 6:27 pm
by Anthropoid
Beauty is in the eye of the bombholder?
RE: Ugliest Bomber of WWII
Posted: Mon Jun 08, 2009 7:24 pm
by AW1Steve
ORIGINAL: Terminus
ORIGINAL: timtom
Honourable mention to the Blen IV (Bolingbroke this one, but hey...).
...but dang the B-10 hit must'a hit every branch falling out of the ugly tree.
Compared to some, the Blenheim was a beautiful airplane...
Except for the deformed nose greenhouse, I'd say that it has very pleasant lines. [:)]
RE: Ugliest Bomber of WWII
Posted: Mon Jun 08, 2009 8:08 pm
by Jim D Burns
ORIGINAL: Mynok
You do have to admire the triple 16" turret on that fake beast though! [:'(]
Now let's not go changing history here Mynok, [:-] that's two x triple 16" turrets, not just one. Note the undercarriage area. [;)][:D][:D]
Jim
RE: Ugliest Bomber of WWII
Posted: Mon Jun 08, 2009 9:58 pm
by rtrapasso
ORIGINAL: Jim D Burns
ORIGINAL: Mynok
You do have to admire the triple 16" turret on that fake beast though! [:'(]
Now let's not go changing history here Mynok, [:-] that's two x triple 16" turrets, not just one. Note the undercarriage area. [;)][:D][:D]
Jim
They could fire them when making a landing on a short runway... of course this was a bit rough on the people at the airbase, not to mention the folks in the "greenhouse" cockpit area right in front of the guns... [X(] [:'(]
RE: Ugliest Bomber of WWII
Posted: Mon Jun 08, 2009 11:04 pm
by Kingfisher
Impressive, but unfortunately it does not belong in this thread as this is no bomber. Note the wing-mounted 76mm guns. Clearly, this was built with dog fighting in mind.
RE: Ugliest Bomber of WWII
Posted: Tue Jun 09, 2009 12:05 am
by Nikademus
ORIGINAL: DivePac88
Here is one in action with a Nazi saucer. [;)]
dum dum dum dum dum dum dum
FLASH!!!!!! AAAAAAHHHHHHH....KING OF THE IMPOSSIBLE (guitar solo)
RE: Ugliest Bomber of WWII
Posted: Tue Jun 09, 2009 5:02 am
by Apollo11
Hi all,
ORIGINAL: DivePac88
And here is a plan.
Sweet Jesus! [X(][X(][X(]
Leo "Apollo11"