Page 7 of 9
RE: Pry's New Scenarios
Posted: Wed Jun 01, 2005 12:27 pm
by Sardaukar
Scen31 as Allied:
7/1/1942 and last base on Java has fallen to IJA. Kido Butai is now teasing Timor and Darwin.
Cheers,
M.S.
RE: Pry's New Scenarios
Posted: Thu Jun 02, 2005 6:11 am
by witpqs
Dumb question (sorry) - where can I find Pry's scenarios?
RE: Pry's New Scenarios
Posted: Thu Jun 02, 2005 6:15 am
by Bodhi
Pry's first post in the thread contains links. They're active as well as being displayed as text, so just click them.
RE: Pry's New Scenarios
Posted: Thu Jun 02, 2005 6:24 am
by witpqs
Thanks. At least I got the 'dumb question' part right.
RE: Pry's New Scenarios
Posted: Thu Jun 02, 2005 12:18 pm
by Sardaukar
Darn IJ AI is trying to take Timor from me !! And with KB it'll probably succeed too. That I didn't see in Scen 16 campaign. Maybe it's 1.5...or Hard difficulty...or something different in Scen 31 [:)]
Cheers,
M.S.
RE: Pry's New Scenarios
Posted: Thu Jun 02, 2005 2:13 pm
by Sardaukar
Pry:
Could you add P-47N as upgrade for P-47D ??
Cheers,
Mika S.
RE: Pry's New Scenarios
Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2005 8:28 am
by witpqs
Pry,
Will your scenarios require modification or restarting once the upgrade to 1.51 takes place?
RE: Pry's New Scenarios
Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2005 9:49 am
by pry
ORIGINAL: witpqs
Pry,
Will your scenarios require modification or restarting once the upgrade to 1.51 takes place?
No modification is needed to make current games compatable with 1.51 as is
These are still in-test scenarios and some modifications will be coming for the data bases which will require restarts to be come effective. I am still tweaking a few things based on results of current testing.
RE: Pry's New Scenarios
Posted: Sun Jun 05, 2005 11:59 am
by pry
Updates...
Files updated to correct several issues 06/05/05
Fixed facing issue of Colorado Class 12/41 forward turret.
Fixed facing issue for North Carolina Class 20 mm (1203) 4/43.
Fixed facing issue for South Dakota Class 20 mm (1205) 1/44.
Fixed device list order for (336) O-19 class, subs should now be able to reload mines from Dutch MLE.
Removed Japanese 33rd Division from Shanghai and have it arriving as a reinforcement in Bangkock 01/01/42, this is meant as an AI helper to get the AI to utilize the 33rd in the correct area of operations. PBEM players can just consider that the 33rd gets a free ride from Shanghai to Bangkock...[;)]
Link to updated files can be found in the 1st post in this thread... Enjoy...
RE: Pry's New Scenarios
Posted: Sun Jun 05, 2005 8:01 pm
by witpqs
ORIGINAL: pry
.
.
.
Location Changes
.
.
.
Allied
.
.
.
Removed all daily supply and fuel from West Coast bases and moved to United States base 330, supply will now have to trickle down to the coast from the supply center. Reduced total daily supply and fuel on to 30,000 supply and 20,000 a day each.(again subject to long term testing, also in testing so far this has caused an occasional bottleneck at US West coast ports while waiting for fuel and supply to trickle down to the ports, values subject to change based on test results)
Pry,
I've been thinking about this. Living in the LA area the past 6 years I've come to appreciate the size of the oil drilling/refining industry here (but I am by no means an expert). It seems like there should be some fuel production (daily supply) in Los Angeles. I don't really have a figure to suggest, and I know this is also a play balance thing anyway. Just food for thought.
I'm looking forward to starting up scenario 30 versus AI when 1.51 is final. Thanks for all the work on these mods.
RE: Pry's New Scenarios
Posted: Sun Jun 05, 2005 9:14 pm
by treespider
ORIGINAL: pry
Updates...
Files updated to correct several issues 06/05/05
Fixed facing issue of Colorado Class 12/41 forward turret.
Fixed facing issue for North Carolina Class 20 mm (1203) 4/43.
Fixed facing issue for South Dakota Class 20 mm (1205) 1/44.
Fixed device list order for (336) O-19 class, subs should now be able to reload mines from Dutch MLE.
Removed Japanese 33rd Division from Shanghai and have it arriving as a reinforcement in Bangkock 01/01/42, this is meant as an AI helper to get the AI to utilize the 33rd in the correct area of operations. PBEM players can just consider that the 33rd gets a free ride from Shanghai to Bangkock...[;)]
Link to updated files can be found in the 1st post in this thread... Enjoy...
I assume I can make these changes manually in the database editor? I am in the middle of a PBEM and would prefer to leave the 33rd Division in Shanghai. If I can make the changes manually what are the correct settings?
Colorado 12/41 change to_____
NC 20MM changed to ____
SD 20mm changed to ____
And the o-19.......
RE: Pry's New Scenarios
Posted: Sun Jun 05, 2005 10:08 pm
by Andrew Brown
I have now uploaded the newly revised scenarios 33,34 and 35 (for my map) to my
scenarios web page.
RE: Pry's New Scenarios
Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2005 9:53 am
by pry
ORIGINAL: treespider
I assume I can make these changes manually in the database editor? I am in the middle of a PBEM and would prefer to leave the 33rd Division in Shanghai. If I can make the changes manually what are the correct settings?
Colorado 12/41 change to_____
NC 20MM changed to ____
SD 20mm changed to ____
And the o-19.......
The scenario files are only read at the start of the scenario, any changes require a restart to become effective. In your case beings you already have a game going I would not bother as the changes are minor.
I would download the new files if you plan to start a new game.
RE: Pry's New Scenarios
Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2005 9:54 am
by pry
ORIGINAL: Andrew Brown
I have now uploaded the newly revised scenarios 33,34 and 35 (for my map) to my
scenarios web page.
Thanks Andrew
RE: Pry's New Scenarios
Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2005 10:06 am
by pry
ORIGINAL: Sardaukar
Pry:
Could you add P-47N as upgrade for P-47D ??
Cheers,
Mika S.
I will consider this request, looking into the details it seems over 1,100 of these were produced and some made it to the Pacific and were operationally used.
RE: Pry's New Scenarios
Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2005 1:07 pm
by Sardaukar
ORIGINAL: pry
I will consider this request, looking into the details it seems over 1,100 of these were produced and some made it to the Pacific and were operationally used.
Very good, especially if game continue beyond historical date !! AFAIK, P-47N was special Pacific version with extended range..and was build in quite large numbers.
RE: Pry's New Scenarios
Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2005 12:34 am
by Buck Beach
I am no expert on OOBs but your P-38F FS (and some of the P-40Bs) tweaked my curiosity. I looked up on the INTERNET and found that the 27th, 71st & 94th FS did in fact spend a short time on the Pacific Coast protecting the bases at the first of part of the war, but their fighting was done in the Med and Europe arenas. Without a withdrawal provision (and who wants that) I guess it would be left up to a house rule or an individual to dissolve the squadrons later when appropriate. Lots of work for the few months on the line. (Oh my, I can hear Oleg screaming already). I know some the squadrons (or all of them) get upgraded to P-80s later.
RE: Pry's New Scenarios
Posted: Thu Jun 09, 2005 10:24 am
by pry
ORIGINAL: witpqs
Pry,
I've been thinking about this. Living in the LA area the past 6 years I've come to appreciate the size of the oil drilling/refining industry here (but I am by no means an expert). It seems like there should be some fuel production (daily supply) in Los Angeles. I don't really have a figure to suggest, and I know this is also a play balance thing anyway. Just food for thought.
I'm looking forward to starting up scenario 30 versus AI when 1.51 is final. Thanks for all the work on these mods.
I left all the oil and resource centers where they were I just moved and reduced the additional allotment of (Offmap) extra Fuel and Supply inland to help slow down it's availability.
RE: Pry's New Scenarios
Posted: Thu Jun 09, 2005 10:30 am
by pry
ORIGINAL: Buck Beach
I am no expert on OOBs but your P-38F FS (and some of the P-40Bs) tweaked my curiosity. I looked up on the INTERNET and found that the 27th, 71st & 94th FS did in fact spend a short time on the Pacific Coast protecting the bases at the first of part of the war, but their fighting was done in the Med and Europe arenas. Without a withdrawal provision (and who wants that) I guess it would be left up to a house rule or an individual to dissolve the squadrons later when appropriate. Lots of work for the few months on the line. (Oh my, I can hear Oleg screaming already). I know some the squadrons (or all of them) get upgraded to P-80s later.
Without a withdrawl feature it is tough, yes these units went to Europe but they were indeed stationed on the west coast for a time and could have been commited to the Pacific had the need been there. That is why I assigned to west coast command, if the allied player wants to use them then he has to pay the PP to get them so it is not free and not a giveme...
As for who would want a US withdrawl feature, I'll stand at the front of the line for that...
RE: Pry's New Scenarios
Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2005 11:57 am
by treespider
Do you plan on upgrading to reflect OOB changes in v1.52? (These may be significant enough to warrant a restart) Some of which you already fixed...
On a similar note...when you update a device...ie the forward Colorado class turret...Do you have to update the facing in the device list as well as in the ship list for each individual ship?