Page 7 of 15

RE: FILE SET RHS 2.22 Released [Minor update]

Posted: Wed May 10, 2006 8:55 pm
by el cid again
IJN Port Base Force (960) has Kaiten D -> should have Kaiten C that upgrades later to Kaiten D
- IJN Special Base Force (963) has Kaiten D -> should have Kaiten C that upgrades later to Kaiten D

You are correct. Fixed.

RE: FILE SET RHS 2.22 Released [Minor update]

Posted: Wed May 10, 2006 8:58 pm
by el cid again
- M6A1 (046) weapon slot 1 is empty, intentional

It was designed to carry a 20mm cannon - 2 actually. But they were not mounted and I removed them.

RE: FILE SET RHS 2.22 Released [Minor update]

Posted: Wed May 10, 2006 9:00 pm
by el cid again
[quote] Amagi (012) has n
[quote]ORIGINAL: Aterpa

- G8N1 (030) has in weapon slot 7 device 000 10 times
- M6A1 (046) weapon slot 1 is empty, intentional?
- Amagi (012) has no torpedo bombers


Sure it does - they just got lost on a navigation training flight - and landed on Unryu. Looks the same you know. Fixed

RE: FILE SET RHS 2.22 Released [Minor update]

Posted: Wed May 10, 2006 9:00 pm
by el cid again
Ise and Hyuga airgroups have wrong strength (they are 14/2(1) and 8/1 -> should be 14/8 and 8/14)

Depends on whom you believe. Will check - I have the actual data.

RE: FILE SET RHS 2.22 Released [Minor update]

Posted: Wed May 10, 2006 9:03 pm
by el cid again
Musashi has float fighters (F1M2 FF), intentional?

Technically the F1M2 Pete is an observation plane - and it replaced the E8N2 in the short range recon role - so yes it is intentional. It is raged as a float fighter because - it could be!

RE: FILE SET RHS 2.22 Released [Minor update]

Posted: Wed May 10, 2006 9:09 pm
by el cid again
- Nippo Maru has no aircraft (they are on Kimikawa Maru)

So they are. Should be slot 518 - Nippo Maru.

RE: FILE SET RHS 2.22 Released [Minor update]

Posted: Wed May 10, 2006 10:48 pm
by KittyHawk
there are two 52nd Naval Garrison
-52nd (1122)
-52nd (1125)

-4.7in/45 3YT SP Gun (10) is this suppose to be a STATIC device when it is issued to a LCU like 5th IJN(1554) or 6th IJN(1555)?

Thanks,
KHawk

RE: FILE SET RHS 2.23 Released [Minor update]

Posted: Thu May 11, 2006 2:22 am
by CobraAus
RHSCVO & RAO v2.23 packaged and dispersed do the usual

Cobra Aus

RE: FILE SET RHS 2.22 Released [Minor update]

Posted: Thu May 11, 2006 3:35 am
by el cid again
It is RHS-RAO, so I should be able to give orders to Russians? But I can't. Am I doing something wrong?

I don't know. Will investigate in 10 hours.

The Russians work. However, I hear I once sent out CVO files labed as RAO. Make sure your files are number 061 - not 060 - which is the CVO set.


RE: FILE SET RHS 2.22 Released [Minor update]

Posted: Thu May 11, 2006 3:36 am
by el cid again
there are two 52nd Naval Garrison
-52nd (1122)
-52nd (1125)

Usually it - and 5.5s - and 5 inchers - are static - mounted on cement pads. However, I tie them down only when I have alterior motives -
either the base MUST be supported AND/OR there is a supply sink in the unit.

When I looked at these units I saw neither guns nor static devices. You sure you got the right slots? These units are landing parties - armed sailors.

RE: FILE SET RHS 2.22 Released [Minor update]

Posted: Thu May 11, 2006 7:57 am
by Guest
Many rivers ports are defined as "airbases" not "bases". Is it ok?
1st IJA Raiding Bde is attached to 3rd JAAF Div.
50 Hvy AA bn has TOE like AA Rgt.
Industry. Oil (in Japan, Manchucuo, DEI, Malaya, Philipines and Burma + reserve) are sufficiently for Japan heavy industry (+ big reserve) but resorces are too small. Intentional?

RE: FILE SET RHS 2.22 Released [Minor update]

Posted: Thu May 11, 2006 8:34 am
by CobraAus
hi mate did you get your map problems worked out

and there was no work done on the jump map its too small for changes to show up I have found

Cobra Aus

RE: FILE SET RHS 2.22 Released [Minor update]

Posted: Thu May 11, 2006 9:39 am
by Guest
I'm thinking that map panels: WITP10 and WITP 11 for RHS weren't uploaded with others. I downloaded this panels from Andy Brown page. Theys little uncompatibly but ok at this moment. Thanks for you interest.

I looked that Lily II has identical bomb load for short and extended range (8x100) it's ok?
Planes in RHS have very, very long range. Are this practical range for this planes? In RHS Liberator have to bombard Soerabaja from Australia and use then his short range...

RE: FILE SET RHS 2.22 Released [Minor update]

Posted: Thu May 11, 2006 10:05 am
by CobraAus
I'm thinking that map panels: WITP10 and WITP 11 for RHS weren't uploaded with others.
I just did a check of the file packs that were upload and both WITP10 & 11 were in the PACK2
at Rouges an & Spookies download site
but to get over this and for RHS you must have the RHS maps send me your E-mail via PM not on the open forum and I will mail to you to night or in the morning (Aus time)

Cobra Aus

RE: FILE SET RHS 2.22 Released [Minor update]

Posted: Thu May 11, 2006 11:01 am
by Guest
I downloaded pack2 from Spookies site (again) and I didn't find this panels. But I downloaded pack2 from Rogue site and yes, I found theys.

RE: FILE SET RHS 2.22 Released [Minor update]

Posted: Thu May 11, 2006 11:19 am
by CobraAus
I downloaded pack2 from Spookies site (again) and I didn't find this panels. But I downloaded pack2 from Rogue site and yes, I finded theys.
ok glad you are ok now I will double check spookies and fix

Cobra Aus

RE: FILE SET RHS 2.22 Released [Minor update]

Posted: Thu May 11, 2006 11:44 am
by pz501
Not sure if these have been mentioned before:

Under Locations, "Solomons" is mis-spelled as "Solomans" for every entry.

III Indian Corps HQ begins the scenario in India, not in Malaya, where it was historically.

RE: FILE SET RHS 2.22 Released [Minor update]

Posted: Thu May 11, 2006 11:52 am
by el cid again
Many rivers ports are defined as "airbases" not "bases". Is it ok?

No it is not OK. And no one has yet figured that one out. I have a theory - I will test it. It does not matter what you set - the port values do not work.

Where are you seeing a value "air bases"? What are you looking at ?

RE: FILE SET RHS 2.22 Released [Minor update]

Posted: Thu May 11, 2006 11:56 am
by el cid again
1st IJA Raiding Bde is attached to 3rd JAAF Div.


No. While this is quite historical, it is not functional in WITP. Should be 4 - Southern Area. Worse - the other raiding units have no HQ. Fixed.

RE: FILE SET RHS 2.22 Released [Minor update]

Posted: Thu May 11, 2006 12:02 pm
by Guest
ORIGINAL: el cid again
Many rivers ports are defined as "airbases" not "bases". Is it ok?

No it is not OK. And no one has yet figured that one out. I have a theory - I will test it. It does not matter what you set - the port values do not work.

Where are you seeing a value "air bases"? What are you looking at ?

With database editor - locations - type - you choose 02 base or 06 airfield (or 05 HQ for example).