Page 629 of 1500
RE: THE THREAD!!!
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 8:29 pm
by Onime No Kyo
ORIGINAL: Chickenboy
ORIGINAL: Onime No Kyo
Damn nice family car if you ask me.
Ummm...no. Small cars are decidedly compromising of space, ergonomics and-often-collision safety. Important factors for anyone with kids.
Its a HUGE car for Germany. [:D] My brother called it a "van". My reaction was "dude, you have no idea what a van is, do you"?
RE: THE THREAD!!!
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 8:30 pm
by Onime No Kyo
ORIGINAL: Chickenboy
ORIGINAL: Dixie
ORIGINAL: Onime No Kyo
My half-brother in Germany had this thing called a Ford XMax (iirc). Damn nice family car if you ask me. Big enough that you cant reach back far enough to smack the kids upside the head and small enough to park.
Nein! Nein! And three times Nein! I shall not drive any vehicle of that nature. Anything that looks like a mini-bus is not the transport for me. Looking at something with space for wee man in the back and a smaller engine, a cheeky 1.6L should do me for now.
How 'bout this one for 'ya Dix? Stylin' that even the little lady must love:
That such a cute little toaster.
RE: THE THREAD!!!
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 8:30 pm
by Onime No Kyo
ORIGINAL: Chickenboy
Or this one? 'Cuz that's what I'm talkin' about:
Is that the $3000 Indian car?
RE: THE THREAD!!!
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 8:37 pm
by Chickenboy
Anyone else seen a video with a tank v. tank engagement in the same frame at close range? Pretty incredible footage:
http://www.military.com/video/combat-ve ... 042855001/
RE: THE THREAD!!!
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 9:04 pm
by Schanilec
ORIGINAL: Onime No Kyo
ORIGINAL: Schanilec
ORIGINAL: Onime No Kyo
Not to go off on a political track but it sounds like you were expecting to automagically have gainful, full-time employment the morning after Romney got elected? [X(]
No, but my chances became slimmer. And with taxes going up at the end of the year. This does not help.
Sorry, still dont get it. How did your chances become slimmer? Did Mr. Romney promise you a job in the administration if he got elected? Why would your taxes go up (assuming you didnt suddenly start making significantly more money)? [&:]
Lets try it this way. Do think my chances got better. Higher taxes more regulations make employers hire? Plus I have farm land. My taxes are going to be less when they increase? Interesting concept you have there my rosy red rat.[:D]
RE: THE THREAD!!!
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 9:27 pm
by Historiker
ORIGINAL: Onime No Kyo
ORIGINAL: Historiker
ORIGINAL: Onime No Kyo
I dont get it. I just dont. The value of commodities just became less because a bunch of trader dudes didnt like how the election turned out? And our pension funds are directly tied to this?
they expect more taxes, more regulations, more government intervention.
Makes perfect sense to react that way.
Yeah, because thats exactly what the track record for the previous 4 years has shown. [8|]
[:D]
True. The last four years have been a tremendous success story! [&o][:D][&o][:D]
RE: THE THREAD!!!
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 9:37 pm
by Onime No Kyo
ORIGINAL: Schanilec
ORIGINAL: Onime No Kyo
ORIGINAL: Schanilec
No, but my chances became slimmer. And with taxes going up at the end of the year. This does not help.
Sorry, still dont get it. How did your chances become slimmer? Did Mr. Romney promise you a job in the administration if he got elected? Why would your taxes go up (assuming you didnt suddenly start making significantly more money)? [&:]
Lets try it this way. Do think my chances got better. Higher taxes more regulations make employers hire? Plus I have farm land. My taxes are going to be less when they increase? Interesting concept you have there my rosy red rat.[:D]
But dude, what indications (aside from certain news networks) do you have of your taxes going up? If the last 4 years are anything to judge by, absolutely nothing will change in the tax rates simply because no one will let this administration increase taxes on those with an income of $250K+/year and no one would be stupid enough to raise taxes on those with less income without that stipulation. If they do, I'll be protesting in front of the White House right there with you.
And what in the world do regulations have to do with hiring? Theyre just the rules you play by in whatever industry youre in. If I have a manufacturing business and all of a sudden the goobermint tells me to increase my employee safety standards, I will not shut down my business in a huff of annoyance. I'll change my business practices to conform with the regulations just like I've done for every other regulation since I opened my business. Sorry, as a business owner I would not have the luxury of picking and choosing which regulations I abide by based on what administration passed them, which is what seems to be the implication here. Oh, and by the way, if I still need a forklift driver, and you happen to be a driver of forklifts, I'll still hire you. [8|]
RE: THE THREAD!!!
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 9:38 pm
by Onime No Kyo
ORIGINAL: Historiker
ORIGINAL: Onime No Kyo
ORIGINAL: Historiker
they expect more taxes, more regulations, more government intervention.
Makes perfect sense to react that way.
Yeah, because thats exactly what the track record for the previous 4 years has shown. [8|]
[:D]
True. The last four years have been a tremendous success story! [&o][:D][&o][:D]
I could have that discussion, but not here. [:-]
RE: THE THREAD!!!
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 9:45 pm
by Historiker
ORIGINAL: Onime No Kyo
ORIGINAL: Schanilec
ORIGINAL: Onime No Kyo
Sorry, still dont get it. How did your chances become slimmer? Did Mr. Romney promise you a job in the administration if he got elected? Why would your taxes go up (assuming you didnt suddenly start making significantly more money)? [&:]
Lets try it this way. Do think my chances got better. Higher taxes more regulations make employers hire? Plus I have farm land. My taxes are going to be less when they increase? Interesting concept you have there my rosy red rat.[:D]
But dude, what indications (aside from certain news networks) do you have of your taxes going up? If the last 4 years are anything to judge by, absolutely nothing will change in the tax rates simply because no one will let this administration increase taxes on those with an income of $250K+/year and no one would be stupid enough to raise taxes on those with less income without that stipulation. If they do, I'll be protesting in front of the White House right there with you.
And what in the world do regulations have to do with hiring? Theyre just the rules you play by in whatever industry youre in. If I have a manufacturing business and all of a sudden the goobermint tells me to increase my employee safety standards, I will not shut down my business in a huff of annoyance. I'll change my business practices to conform with the regulations just like I've done for every other regulation since I opened my business. Sorry, as a business owner I would not have the luxury of picking and choosing which regulations I abide by based on what administration passed them, which is what seems to be the implication here. Oh, and by the way, if I still need a forklift driver, and you happen to be a driver of forklifts, I'll still hire you. [8|]
To put in a nutshell, my friend:
I gave up my profit generating company because of regulations.
RE: THE THREAD!!!
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 9:48 pm
by Onime No Kyo
ORIGINAL: Historiker
ORIGINAL: Onime No Kyo
ORIGINAL: Schanilec
Lets try it this way. Do think my chances got better. Higher taxes more regulations make employers hire? Plus I have farm land. My taxes are going to be less when they increase? Interesting concept you have there my rosy red rat.[:D]
But dude, what indications (aside from certain news networks) do you have of your taxes going up? If the last 4 years are anything to judge by, absolutely nothing will change in the tax rates simply because no one will let this administration increase taxes on those with an income of $250K+/year and no one would be stupid enough to raise taxes on those with less income without that stipulation. If they do, I'll be protesting in front of the White House right there with you.
And what in the world do regulations have to do with hiring? Theyre just the rules you play by in whatever industry youre in. If I have a manufacturing business and all of a sudden the goobermint tells me to increase my employee safety standards, I will not shut down my business in a huff of annoyance. I'll change my business practices to conform with the regulations just like I've done for every other regulation since I opened my business. Sorry, as a business owner I would not have the luxury of picking and choosing which regulations I abide by based on what administration passed them, which is what seems to be the implication here. Oh, and by the way, if I still need a forklift driver, and you happen to be a driver of forklifts, I'll still hire you. [8|]
To put in a nutshell, my friend:
I gave up my profit generating company because of regulations.
Well, you and (according to him, in theory) Bill O'Reilly. The rest of us would suck it up and carry on, I think.
RE: THE THREAD!!!
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 9:52 pm
by AW1Steve
ORIGINAL: Onime No Kyo
ORIGINAL: Historiker
ORIGINAL: Onime No Kyo
But dude, what indications (aside from certain news networks) do you have of your taxes going up? If the last 4 years are anything to judge by, absolutely nothing will change in the tax rates simply because no one will let this administration increase taxes on those with an income of $250K+/year and no one would be stupid enough to raise taxes on those with less income without that stipulation. If they do, I'll be protesting in front of the White House right there with you.
And what in the world do regulations have to do with hiring? Theyre just the rules you play by in whatever industry youre in. If I have a manufacturing business and all of a sudden the goobermint tells me to increase my employee safety standards, I will not shut down my business in a huff of annoyance. I'll change my business practices to conform with the regulations just like I've done for every other regulation since I opened my business. Sorry, as a business owner I would not have the luxury of picking and choosing which regulations I abide by based on what administration passed them, which is what seems to be the implication here. Oh, and by the way, if I still need a forklift driver, and you happen to be a driver of forklifts, I'll still hire you. [8|]
To put in a nutshell, my friend:
I gave up my profit generating company because of regulations.
Well, you and (according to him, in theory) Bill O'Reilly. The rest of us would suck it up and carry on, I think.
Are you familiar with the expression "going Galt"? [:(] You go ahead and suck it up. I'm going to hunker down. And that is as close as to talking about politics as I'm going to get. [8|]
RE: THE THREAD!!!
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 9:53 pm
by AW1Steve
oh. look. I got a new page.
RE: THE THREAD!!!
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 9:57 pm
by Historiker
ORIGINAL: AW1Steve
Are you familiar with the expression "going Galt"? [:(] You go ahead and suck it up. I'm going to hunker down. And that is as close as to talking about politics as I'm going to get. [8|]
Amen, brother!
But while the snappish comment by someone who has propably never run an own company implicates I was to weak to work with the regulations - the regulations would've made my legitimate company impossible within five years and already made it almost impossible to increase market share in 2013. So I took the first chance to end it all with just a blue eye.
Regulations make some businesses impossible, while they favor big companies in other fields and make competing with established businesses almost impossible.
RE: THE THREAD!!!
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 10:12 pm
by Onime No Kyo
Actually I havent heard that expression. But let me put it this way, if youre a successful business owner who decides to shut down his business because you dont agree with the regulations on moral grounds, my hat's off to you. You have more balls than I do. If it were me, I would have made money as long as I was able to. But if someone decides to shut down because theyre a chemical manufacturer who cant run his business without dumping runoff in the local river or a Wall St. hedge fund manager who finds the idea of anyone having actual visibility into what the hell youre doing over there simply too abhorrent, then I believe thats the point. [8|]
RE: THE THREAD!!!
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 10:20 pm
by Historiker
ORIGINAL: Onime No Kyo
Actually I havent heard that expression. But let me put it this way, if youre a successful business owner who decides to shut down his business because you dont agree with the regulations on moral grounds, my hat's off to you. You have more balls than I do. If it were me, I would have made money as long as I was able to. But if someone decides to shut down because theyre a chemical manufacturer who cant run his business without dumping runoff in the local river or a Wall St. hedge fund manager who finds the idea of anyone having actual visibility into what the hell youre doing over there simply too abhorrent, then I believe thats the point. [8|]
The chemical plant is a good example for what I should've mentioned:
SOME regulations make sense.
Regulations have the characteristic, that they are usually explained as to be necessary to help the people, protect the people, or whatever. While this might be legit in the case of a chemical plant or a water dam, they often are rather the product of the believe people can't take care for themselves - or they are the result of lobbying by special interest groups.
A regulation forbidding motorcycles would make driving more safe, that much is certain. But it would also destroy thousands of jobs in all those businesses that produce motorcycles, the parts for motorcycles, those that sell them, those that repair them. It would also affect the helmet industry, the cycling-wear industry... Always every part from the farmer that can't sell his cow hides any more to the retailer's cleaning woman.
Sure. Some motorcyclists would buy a car instead, not having owned one before. They would also have to rent a parking space in the city, not being able to park where they did so far. But those few extra sales would never make good all those jobs that were destroyed before. Also, not everyone could afford the higher tolls, parking costs, insurance costs...
It's the classic broken window fallancy.
You get my point?
While you know my political pov, you can certainly discuss about the industries and the extent of regulations. But please don't say: regulations have no imapct on the job market!
RE: THE THREAD!!!
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 10:24 pm
by AW1Steve
ORIGINAL: Onime No Kyo
Actually I havent heard that expression. But let me put it this way, if youre a successful business owner who decides to shut down his business because you dont agree with the regulations on moral grounds, my hat's off to you. You have more balls than I do. If it were me, I would have made money as long as I was able to. But if someone decides to shut down because theyre a chemical manufacturer who cant run his business without dumping runoff in the local river or a Wall St. hedge fund manager who finds the idea of anyone having actual visibility into what the hell youre doing over there simply too abhorrent, then I believe thats the point. [8|]
I have been successful in running my own small buisness in the past , and had planned to open one in the near future. Emphasis on the word "had". I have no plans as of today of investing one penny in a new business in the near future. None. I'll sit on what assets are not taken away from me. WHY? When I'll be rewarded by having even more taken way from me? No one can force me to invest . Or earn one penny more than I have to to survive. I'll be no mans slave. Period. [:(]
BTW , the term "Going John Galt" was coined by another Russian refugee to this country. You might pick up some of her works.
RE: THE THREAD!!!
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 10:27 pm
by Historiker
ORIGINAL: AW1Steve
ORIGINAL: Onime No Kyo
Actually I havent heard that expression. But let me put it this way, if youre a successful business owner who decides to shut down his business because you dont agree with the regulations on moral grounds, my hat's off to you. You have more balls than I do. If it were me, I would have made money as long as I was able to. But if someone decides to shut down because theyre a chemical manufacturer who cant run his business without dumping runoff in the local river or a Wall St. hedge fund manager who finds the idea of anyone having actual visibility into what the hell youre doing over there simply too abhorrent, then I believe thats the point. [8|]
I have been successful in running my own small buisness in the past , and had planned to open one in the near future. Emphasis on the word "had". I have no plans as of today of investing one penny in a new business in the near future. None. I'll sit on what assets are not taken away from me. WHY? When I'll be rewarded by having even more taken way from me? No one can force me to invest . Or earn one penny more than I have to to survive. I'll be no mans slave. Period. [:(]
BTW , the term "Going John Galt" was coined by another Russian refugee to this country. You might pick up some of her works.
Who is John Galt?
RE: THE THREAD!!!
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 10:30 pm
by Onime No Kyo
ORIGINAL: AW1Steve
ORIGINAL: Onime No Kyo
Actually I havent heard that expression. But let me put it this way, if youre a successful business owner who decides to shut down his business because you dont agree with the regulations on moral grounds, my hat's off to you. You have more balls than I do. If it were me, I would have made money as long as I was able to. But if someone decides to shut down because theyre a chemical manufacturer who cant run his business without dumping runoff in the local river or a Wall St. hedge fund manager who finds the idea of anyone having actual visibility into what the hell youre doing over there simply too abhorrent, then I believe thats the point. [8|]
I have been successful in running my own small buisness in the past , and had planned to open one in the near future. Emphasis on the word "had". I have no plans as of today of investing one penny in a new business in the near future. None. I'll sit on what assets are not taken away from me. WHY? When I'll be rewarded by having even more taken way from me? No one can force me to invest . Or earn one penny more than I have to to survive. I'll be no mans slave. Period. [:(]
BTW , the term "Going John Galt" was coined by another Russian refugee to this country. You might pick up some of her works.
Never read Atlas but it makes sense now. Listen, its a personal choice that you make. Any decision you make is valid by default. I probably wouldnt want to be a business owner either, but I have different reasons for that. And that decision would be equally valid.
RE: THE THREAD!!!
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 10:36 pm
by Chickenboy
ORIGINAL: Onime No Kyo
I could have that discussion, but not here. [:-]
Yer right. We all got in our 'shots'. There are some raw nerves out there, mine included. Let's back off of the political talk on THE THREAD for a bit, shall we?
RE: THE THREAD!!!
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 10:37 pm
by AW1Steve
ORIGINAL: Historiker
ORIGINAL: AW1Steve
ORIGINAL: Onime No Kyo
Actually I havent heard that expression. But let me put it this way, if youre a successful business owner who decides to shut down his business because you dont agree with the regulations on moral grounds, my hat's off to you. You have more balls than I do. If it were me, I would have made money as long as I was able to. But if someone decides to shut down because theyre a chemical manufacturer who cant run his business without dumping runoff in the local river or a Wall St. hedge fund manager who finds the idea of anyone having actual visibility into what the hell youre doing over there simply too abhorrent, then I believe thats the point. [8|]
I have been successful in running my own small buisness in the past , and had planned to open one in the near future. Emphasis on the word "had". I have no plans as of today of investing one penny in a new business in the near future. None. I'll sit on what assets are not taken away from me. WHY? When I'll be rewarded by having even more taken way from me? No one can force me to invest . Or earn one penny more than I have to to survive. I'll be no mans slave. Period. [:(]
BTW , the term "Going John Galt" was coined by another Russian refugee to this country. You might pick up some of her works.
Who is John Galt?
That's exactly the question.