Page 8 of 8
RE: Caspian Crusade (no M60A3TTS please)
Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 1:31 am
by Michael T
Pelton, the question was in relation to games where I was playing the Axis.
RE: Caspian Crusade (no M60A3TTS please)
Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 1:48 am
by Peltonx
ORIGINAL: M60A3TTS
There are more than the 30 at risk in the south which Pelton casually throws out as a figure, plus there are the vehicles in Kharkov to be considered. If you are planning on tank and mech forces of considerable numbers, then you have to have the vehicles available to support them.
Good try and yes you are not a coward to say the least.
The 30 is a number thats been talked about allot in more then 1 thread. Its basicly Flaviusx idea and others have built on it.
It was born back when HQ build ups were used now GHC only has and air lift which will get nerfed at some point.
You simply leave the 30ish pts west of the rivers, this puts you ahead of the "curve " no matter how fast GHC goes.
SHC can get everything out NP east of rivers.
PM Flaviusx for the basic evac plan. Its a game saver for any SHC. SHC can easly do with out 50 arm pts so 30 is not going to hurt.
RE: Caspian Crusade (no M60A3TTS please)
Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 6:23 pm
by Shupov
ORIGINAL: juret
ORIGINAL: Michael T
No I have definately seen Tank xx with 40-45 mp iin 1942.
me to
my last mp game i had 2 tank divs with mp30+ as SHC player used em to blitz very deep into german hexes each turn to flip em and make alot of zoc
Germans beware - Soviet MP increases dramatically on 1/1/42. In a current 1.06.27 PBEM game my 105th Tank Division gets 40 MP and makes a dash for the Baltic coast and Riga!
