Page 8 of 19

RE: Australian Beauties II

Posted: Sat Jan 15, 2022 1:34 pm
by Orm
And a nice looking cruiser.

Image

RE: Australian Beauties II

Posted: Sat Jan 15, 2022 6:14 pm
by Edmon
ORIGINAL: ncc1701e

ORIGINAL: Edmon
ORIGINAL: ncc1701e

Yeah I don't see the beauty in anything like a Grant or a Lee. [;)]

Image

Much better [;)]

It's an awful tank, I will admit. Apparently the Russians called it (loosely translated) "The honourable coffin for 6 men". It's riveted design meant that, if struck or just even moderately agitated, the bolts that held it together would be launched into the crew compartment like bullets. Which was, shall we say, less than optimal for the crews health.

RE: Australian Beauties II

Posted: Sat Jan 15, 2022 6:27 pm
by Orm
A weird design. HMS Gotland is looking more like a cruise ship, than a cruiser, or rather a aircraft cruiser. What purpose she would have had in a conflict eludes me.

Image

RE: Australian Beauties II

Posted: Sat Jan 15, 2022 10:00 pm
by Lobster
French ironclad Carnot. It hurts my eyes when I look at it. And this isn't the worst looking one.
https://www.thevintagenews.com/2016/02/ ... 4/?edg-c=1


Image

RE: Australian Beauties II

Posted: Sat Jan 15, 2022 10:23 pm
by RangerJoe
ORIGINAL: Lobster

French ironclad Carnot. It hurts my eyes when I look at it. And this isn't the worst looking one.
https://www.thevintagenews.com/2016/02/ ... 4/?edg-c=1


Image

It needs more flags . . .

RE: Australian Beauties II

Posted: Sun Jan 16, 2022 2:59 am
by warspite1
The Leander-class. Beautiful. Unusual - certainly for British cruisers of the time - in that they had just one stack.

Image

RE: Australian Beauties II

Posted: Sun Jan 16, 2022 11:49 am
by RangerJoe
Well, you will have to open the picture to see them but here are a couple of nice, big [;)] things . . .

I guess that a person could call them "Jugs" [;)] and they appear to be a nice, matching set of those big and beautiful things . . .

A song as well . . .

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Joo90ZWrUkU


RE: Australian Beauties II

Posted: Sun Jan 16, 2022 1:45 pm
by Orm
ORIGINAL: warspite1

The Leander-class. Beautiful. Unusual - certainly for British cruisers of the time - in that they had just one stack.
You said it.

RE: Australian Beauties II

Posted: Sun Jan 16, 2022 2:15 pm
by ncc1701e
ORIGINAL: Lobster

French ironclad Carnot. It hurts my eyes when I look at it. And this isn't the worst looking one.
https://www.thevintagenews.com/2016/02/ ... 4/?edg-c=1


Image

It's a submarine, isn't it?

RE: Australian Beauties II

Posted: Sun Jan 16, 2022 7:03 pm
by Alpha77
Only WW2 ? A bit boring.cause I believe apart from T34/85 the Leo1 is my fave tank:

Image

Image


RE: Australian Beauties II

Posted: Sun Jan 16, 2022 8:23 pm
by RangerJoe
ORIGINAL: ncc1701e

ORIGINAL: Lobster

French ironclad Carnot. It hurts my eyes when I look at it. And this isn't the worst looking one.
https://www.thevintagenews.com/2016/02/ ... 4/?edg-c=1


Image

It's a submarine, isn't it?

No, it is a battleship.

RE: Australian Beauties II

Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2022 1:54 pm
by Lobster
My favorite medium bomber B-25. https://wallup.net/military-aircraft-ai ... ll-b-25-3/
This one has stingers. [;)]



Image

RE: Australian Beauties II

Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2022 12:45 pm
by warspite1
Sometimes it's difficult to know where 'Character' crosses into ugly.

Personally I've always had a soft spot for the SM.79. I think she stays just the right side of 'full of character'.

Image

RE: Australian Beauties II

Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2022 1:39 pm
by Chijohnaok2
ORIGINAL: Lobster

French ironclad Carnot. It hurts my eyes when I look at it. And this isn't the worst looking one.
https://www.thevintagenews.com/2016/02/ ... 4/?edg-c=1


Image



Drachinifel, the You Tube historical videographer, created a rather long video on the history of these French "hotel" pre-dreadnaughts:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ygXLnRAm-A

RE: Australian Beauties II

Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2022 3:26 pm
by Toby42
If we are going Italian!

Image

RE: Australian Beauties II

Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2022 7:28 pm
by warspite1
ORIGINAL: Toby42

If we are going Italian!
warspite1

Nice pic [:)]

RE: Australian Beauties II

Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2022 7:37 pm
by ncc1701e
ORIGINAL: warspite1

Nice pic [:)]

+1

RE: Australian Beauties II

Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2022 2:29 pm
by warspite1
Sticking with things Italian, there is the Piaggio bomber. No full of character, just ugly thanks to the nose.

Image

RE: Australian Beauties II

Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2022 2:39 pm
by Orm
ORIGINAL: warspite1

Sometimes it's difficult to know where 'Character' crosses into ugly.

Personally I've always had a soft spot for the SM.79. I think she stays just the right side of 'full of character'.
Indeed. You said it.

RE: Australian Beauties II

Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2022 2:41 pm
by Orm
ORIGINAL: Toby42

If we are going Italian!
Very nice. Thank you.