Page 8 of 19
RE: Australian Beauties II
Posted: Sat Jan 15, 2022 1:34 pm
by Orm
And a nice looking cruiser.

RE: Australian Beauties II
Posted: Sat Jan 15, 2022 6:14 pm
by Edmon
ORIGINAL: ncc1701e
ORIGINAL: Edmon
ORIGINAL: ncc1701e
Yeah I don't see the beauty in anything like a Grant or a Lee. [;)]
Much better [;)]
It's an awful tank, I will admit. Apparently the Russians called it (loosely translated) "The honourable coffin for 6 men". It's riveted design meant that, if struck or just even moderately agitated, the bolts that held it together would be launched into the crew compartment like bullets. Which was, shall we say, less than optimal for the crews health.
RE: Australian Beauties II
Posted: Sat Jan 15, 2022 6:27 pm
by Orm
A weird design. HMS Gotland is looking more like a cruise ship, than a cruiser, or rather a aircraft cruiser. What purpose she would have had in a conflict eludes me.

RE: Australian Beauties II
Posted: Sat Jan 15, 2022 10:00 pm
by Lobster
French ironclad Carnot. It hurts my eyes when I look at it. And this isn't the worst looking one.
https://www.thevintagenews.com/2016/02/ ... 4/?edg-c=1

RE: Australian Beauties II
Posted: Sat Jan 15, 2022 10:23 pm
by RangerJoe
It needs more flags . . .
RE: Australian Beauties II
Posted: Sun Jan 16, 2022 2:59 am
by warspite1
The Leander-class. Beautiful. Unusual - certainly for British cruisers of the time - in that they had just one stack.

RE: Australian Beauties II
Posted: Sun Jan 16, 2022 11:49 am
by RangerJoe
Well, you will have to open the picture to see them but here are a couple of nice, big [;)] things . . .
I guess that a person could call them "Jugs" [;)] and they appear to be a nice, matching set of those big and beautiful things . . .
A song as well . . .
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Joo90ZWrUkU
RE: Australian Beauties II
Posted: Sun Jan 16, 2022 1:45 pm
by Orm
ORIGINAL: warspite1
The Leander-class. Beautiful. Unusual - certainly for British cruisers of the time - in that they had just one stack.
You said it.
RE: Australian Beauties II
Posted: Sun Jan 16, 2022 2:15 pm
by ncc1701e
It's a submarine, isn't it?
RE: Australian Beauties II
Posted: Sun Jan 16, 2022 7:03 pm
by Alpha77
Only WW2 ? A bit boring.cause I believe apart from T34/85 the Leo1 is my fave tank:
RE: Australian Beauties II
Posted: Sun Jan 16, 2022 8:23 pm
by RangerJoe
ORIGINAL: ncc1701e
It's a submarine, isn't it?
No, it is a
battleship.
RE: Australian Beauties II
Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2022 1:54 pm
by Lobster
My favorite medium bomber B-25.
https://wallup.net/military-aircraft-ai ... ll-b-25-3/
This one has stingers. [;)]

RE: Australian Beauties II
Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2022 12:45 pm
by warspite1
Sometimes it's difficult to know where 'Character' crosses into ugly.
Personally I've always had a soft spot for the SM.79. I think she stays just the right side of 'full of character'.

RE: Australian Beauties II
Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2022 1:39 pm
by Chijohnaok2
Drachinifel, the You Tube historical videographer, created a rather long video on the history of these French "hotel" pre-dreadnaughts:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ygXLnRAm-A
RE: Australian Beauties II
Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2022 3:26 pm
by Toby42
If we are going Italian!

RE: Australian Beauties II
Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2022 7:28 pm
by warspite1
ORIGINAL: Toby42
If we are going Italian!
warspite1
Nice pic [:)]
RE: Australian Beauties II
Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2022 7:37 pm
by ncc1701e
ORIGINAL: warspite1
Nice pic [:)]
+1
RE: Australian Beauties II
Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2022 2:29 pm
by warspite1
Sticking with things Italian, there is the Piaggio bomber. No full of character, just ugly thanks to the nose.

RE: Australian Beauties II
Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2022 2:39 pm
by Orm
ORIGINAL: warspite1
Sometimes it's difficult to know where 'Character' crosses into ugly.
Personally I've always had a soft spot for the SM.79. I think she stays just the right side of 'full of character'.
Indeed. You said it.
RE: Australian Beauties II
Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2022 2:41 pm
by Orm
ORIGINAL: Toby42
If we are going Italian!
Very nice. Thank you.