Mr FDR and Mr Churchill reading the surrender documents.

- Allies signs surrender.jpg (355.95 KiB) Viewed 2541 times
Many thanks Earlydoors for this game, it was great to work on this combined AAR. Some comments on strategy:
- I now think that it is an IMPERATIVE for the UK/France attacking the Italian
Regia Marina early in the game, before the Luftwaffe arrives to the Med. The UK needs to take control of the Med as Italy will most probably be a future target later in 42-43. In this game the UK lost control of the Med and Italy was left alone, master of the MARE NOSTRUM, upgrading the Regia Marina and becoming an important naval player.
- I think that the Germans took the right decision attacking in
Libya/Egypt. The Allies need to hold the
Suez Canal to deny the passage of the IJN to the Med and Atlantic. And the Iraqi MMPs were a most welcomed additional reward. Do not overkill the Italians in
Abyssinia, the Allies need those Indian troops elsewhere.
- The UK made a good job keeping open the
Murmansk convoys. They controlled important areas of Norway, but they paid a heavy price. The UK strategic bombers were missing in North Africa as was some additional infantry. General O’Connor was left with very few MMPs to work with.
- The Axis naval strategy was to destroy the
Royal Navy not the convoy MMPs. In a long series of small naval actions, the Royal Navy lost half of its strength. Many times, their ships were not even upgraded to even level 1 technologies.
- Once it was clear that the Germans have broken the
Dnepr defense line the Soviets still concentrated many forces in Baltic States and Finland. Stalin should have listened more carefully to General Zhukov…
- The invasion of
India was a long and hard struggle, but it worked well for the Axis powers. India was a
BLACK HOLE for Allied bombers and fighters. No less than 5 heavy bomber wigs and many fighters were operating in the area at the end of the war, far away from the European theater of operations, not hurting the German economy.
- The
Battle of the Atlantic. Germany invested heavily in advance subs and in 1943 they were already building level 4 subs. After losing 5 MTBs and 5 Destroyers the Allies had to invest heavily in anti-sub warfare. The US bought at least 6 CVLs and 5-6 naval bombers, and the UK a few more MTBs and naval bombers. Not many MMPs were left to invest in land Tecnologies or troops.
- The US Navy built more than 8-9 subs, but never upgraded any of them. Why build such a huge sub fleet and no invest in advance subs? Seach for congruency.
- The Allies need many
AAs.