Page 72 of 106
RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back.
Posted: Sat Feb 06, 2016 1:46 pm
by AllenK
So, after much ado about practically nothing, do the Axis wish to initiate combat in the West Med? If so, who to disorganise?

RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back.
Posted: Sat Feb 06, 2016 2:09 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
Oh yes please. Ship in box 2 will initiate combat.
RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back.
Posted: Sat Feb 06, 2016 2:18 pm
by AllenK
I'm assuming the Italian Ftr doesn't want to go to the 1-box. Searches Axis 5, Allies 1. Both successful. Allied losses are NE. 2 surprise points used to increase Italian damage from A to D. The CL is damaged. Fight or Flee?

RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back.
Posted: Sat Feb 06, 2016 2:25 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
Axis stay.
RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back.
Posted: Sat Feb 06, 2016 2:59 pm
by AllenK
Allies also stay, so round 2.
Searches Axis 7, Allies 7. No combat. The damaged CL returns to La Spezia.
USSR rails 1 Inf from Manchuria towards the west. Communists a Garr to Port Arthur.
Chinese make a couple of minor moves.
USSR prepares to attack Seoul and moves units around in the south.

RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back.
Posted: Sat Feb 06, 2016 3:04 pm
by AllenK
1 land combat. Odds 23:3 +14.333.

RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back.
Posted: Sat Feb 06, 2016 3:06 pm
by AllenK
The Japs can add shore bombardment. Do they wish to?

RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back.
Posted: Sat Feb 06, 2016 3:30 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
3 points thanks. And we choose blitz to kill HQ [:D]
RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back.
Posted: Sat Feb 06, 2016 4:15 pm
by AllenK
Zhukov adds HQ support and the Soviets fly a 3-point Lnd. Do the Japs wish to intercept with Ftr?
RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back.
Posted: Sat Feb 06, 2016 4:58 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
Yes pleas and land same hex it takes off.
RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back.
Posted: Sat Feb 06, 2016 6:17 pm
by AllenK
USSR sends a Ftr to counter-intercept.
The air combat goes the Japanese way. I chose to destroy the Soviet bomber on Mayhemizer's behalf as I figured that was the obvious choice.

RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back.
Posted: Sat Feb 06, 2016 6:46 pm
by AllenK
The Blitz goes in. The defenders are forced to retreat.

RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back.
Posted: Sat Feb 06, 2016 7:06 pm
by AllenK
Soviets rebase 3 Lnd from Manchuria towards the west.
CW rebases Mossie to Dover and Sunderland to Tripoli.
Then, yet again, I discover the Spit that was supposed to have shipped to Gib is still at Plymouth and the disorganised Trans is at Gib. I'm getting fed up of this. You load a unit. Double check it's loaded okay. Do the naval movement and move on. Then, when it's far too late to go back, you find it's SNAFU'd. I give up. How many times have you got to check this naval transporting is working okay?
No reorgs.
Weather

RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back.
Posted: Sun Feb 07, 2016 4:52 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
Then, yet again, I discover the Spit that was supposed to have shipped to Gib is still at Plymouth and the disorganised Trans is at Gib. I'm getting fed up of this. You load a unit. Double check it's loaded okay. Do the naval movement and move on. Then, when it's far too late to go back, you find it's SNAFU'd. I give up. How many times have you got to check this naval transporting is working okay?
Can any beta tester tell if units can be moved using tool?
RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back.
Posted: Sun Feb 07, 2016 5:10 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
S/O 41 Axis 5
No DoW
Germany land, Italy combined, Japan land.
Italy makes a port attack in Malta, there are disorganized CV's and other ships. Do CW want to intercept from East Med?

RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back.
Posted: Sun Feb 07, 2016 5:14 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
Another port attack in Pearl Harbor. Which planes would like to intercept? US has few CP's in port.
2 Japanese planes flies as bombers and one plane (with 3 air to air factor) as fighter.

RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back.
Posted: Sun Feb 07, 2016 5:40 pm
by AllenK
At Malta, the 2-2 Swordfish as fighter and just use the Tomahawk at Pearl, thanks.
RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back.
Posted: Sun Feb 07, 2016 5:48 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
Japan can intercept with other planes, do US want to bring more fighters because picture was not showing them?
RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back.
Posted: Sun Feb 07, 2016 5:50 pm
by AllenK
No thanks.
RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back.
Posted: Sun Feb 07, 2016 5:50 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
And I believe US subs wants to stay safe during port attack?