Page 73 of 82
RE: Mayhemizer vs Allen K: The rematch
Posted: Sun Aug 16, 2015 5:11 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
ORIGINAL: AllenK
Guess Italy went for combined or naval then, not land.
Sorry, Italy and Japan combined. Edited to original post.
RE: Mayhemizer vs Allen K: The rematch
Posted: Sun Aug 16, 2015 5:47 pm
by AllenK
M/J 41 Allied 9
No DoW.
All pass except CW, Land for a 40% chance to end the turn.
CW advances in Greece and the Mil and a Div enter Rome. XI Mot swaps places with Yug Cav in Trieste.
No combats or reorgs.
On a 3, turn ends.
RE: Mayhemizer vs Allen K: The rematch
Posted: Sun Aug 16, 2015 6:01 pm
by AllenK
M/J 41 end of turn
A partisan appears in Korea and takes up position in the mountains east of Seoul. Another appears in the Netherlands and sits on the resource hex. 2 partisans appear in Russia, next to the Inf Div that cut the Murmansk road.
US puts a chit in the Ge/It pot. Fleet relocates to Pearl but it passes unnoticed and tension remains the same. US occupies Greenland and Iceland, which does increase tension in Ge/It. US also resolves to send resources to China, which increases tension.
RE: Mayhemizer vs Allen K: The rematch
Posted: Sun Aug 16, 2015 8:16 pm
by AlbertN
I wonder ... CW has Rome, Trieste is a City with a Blue Factory.
What's the CW Garrison factor vs the Axis Garrison Factor in Italy?
If the latter is true, Italy would surrender no?
RE: Mayhemizer vs Allen K: The rematch
Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2015 2:36 am
by AllenK
CW also has Tripoli, so garrison factors don't matter. Italy should surrender.
RE: Mayhemizer vs Allen K: The rematch
Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2015 12:03 pm
by AlbertN
That's quite a feat, but careful on the impact of USE! It's pretty heavy if I remember correctly the table. *goes to check* Hmm, a -18 if Allies conquer Italy.
RE: Mayhemizer vs Allen K: The rematch
Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2015 1:43 pm
by Subotei
ORIGINAL: Mayhemizer
Nice rolls. It would have been fun to see ARM HQ take the first hit
Edit: We are doomed, but we will make you pay before that!
Glad to hear it. [8D] Don't give up the ship!
RE: Mayhemizer vs Allen K: The rematch
Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2015 2:35 pm
by AllenK
ORIGINAL: Cohen
That's quite a feat, but careful on the impact of USE! It's pretty heavy if I remember correctly the table. *goes to check* Hmm, a -18 if Allies conquer Italy.
Oh dear! Looks like I missed that one on the chart. It's amazing how well the eyes fail to spot something you don't want to see.
It should help cheer the Axis up and keep the game interesting. US entry is that screwed on the Ge/It front (partly through choice in USSR DoW'ing Germany) what's another 2 chits
RE: Mayhemizer vs Allen K: The rematch
Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2015 2:54 pm
by Centuur
The conquest of Italy is far more important than US entry in this game. Even if the CW can't hold on Rome in the long run...
Germany has overstretched itself, has far to many fronts to fight on. So it's very important to try to make Germany react on things by creating new small fronts, threathening to do all kinds of nasty things. The economic loss of Italy (even if only for a turn or two), together with the removal of units and the halving of Italy's force pool is quite an achievement.
I believe the Allies can handle the removal of chits in this game...
RE: Mayhemizer vs Allen K: The rematch
Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2015 3:11 pm
by AllenK
ORIGINAL: Centuur
The conquest of Italy is far more important than US entry in this game. Even if the CW can't hold on Rome in the long run...
Germany has overstretched itself, has far to many fronts to fight on. So it's very important to try to make Germany react on things by creating new small fronts, threathening to do all kinds of nasty things. The economic loss of Italy (even if only for a turn or two), together with the removal of units and the halving of Italy's force pool is quite an achievement.
I believe the Allies can handle the removal of chits in this game...
Thanks Centuur. That's reassuring.
RE: Mayhemizer vs Allen K: The rematch
Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2015 4:48 pm
by AllenK
Production:
Germany
Reforming 2 divisions into a Corps unit: Choose XXX Inf
6x MIL
GAR
FTR-2
Pilot
Italy
2x INF
Pilot
FTR-2
Japan
Reforming 2 divisions into a Corps unit: Only one option
INF
MAR
2x CP
CL Kashii (2nd)
CV Junyo (2nd)
CVL Shoho (2nd)
CVL Zhuiho (2nd)
Carrier air-1
SUB 4455 (2nd)
Vichy
Save 2 BP in Vichy
RE: Mayhemizer vs Allen K: The rematch
Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2015 5:39 pm
by AllenK
Allied production
China 4
Mil x2
CW 25
CV
Amph
CV 2nd
Lnd-4
Pilot
CP
Inf
Mot
CVP
Ftr-2
US 10
Inf
CP
Pilot
Ftr-2 x2
USSR 15
Mot x2
Inf
Ftr-2
Pilot
RE: Mayhemizer vs Allen K: The rematch
Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2015 5:41 pm
by AllenK
J/A 41 Initiative
Axis 3, Allies 9.
Do Axis wish to re-roll? They win ties.
RE: Mayhemizer vs Allen K: The rematch
Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2015 5:51 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
Axis want to use reroll. If Axis win initiative, they win this war!!!
RE: Mayhemizer vs Allen K: The rematch
Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2015 5:56 pm
by AllenK
Re-roll - Axis 2, Allies 7. Allies to go first.
Weather turns out fine except Nth Monsoon.
RE: Mayhemizer vs Allen K: The rematch
Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2015 6:05 pm
by AllenK
J/A 41 Allied 1
No DoW
CW Naval, US Combined, USSR & China Land, France Pass.
RE: Mayhemizer vs Allen K: The rematch
Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2015 7:05 pm
by AlbertN
So Italy is no more now?
RE: Mayhemizer vs Allen K: The rematch
Posted: Tue Aug 18, 2015 3:13 am
by AllenK
ORIGINAL: Cohen
So Italy is no more now?
Italy was partially conquered. Il Duce relocated to Italian Somaliland.
Also Hungary returned to Axis control.
RE: Mayhemizer vs Allen K: The rematch
Posted: Tue Aug 18, 2015 8:41 am
by Subotei
Italy was partially conquered. Il Duce relocated to Italian Somaliland.
[:D] I forgot they still had it. World domination can't be far behind.
RE: Mayhemizer vs Allen K: The rematch
Posted: Tue Aug 18, 2015 1:12 pm
by etsadler
ORIGINAL: AllenK
ORIGINAL: Cohen
So Italy is no more now?
Italy was partially conquered. Il Duce relocated to Italian Somaliland.
Also Hungary returned to Axis control.
Was the third item that the Allies hold Tripoli, or that the Allied garrison factors were greater than the Italian? I looked for a map that reflected the garrison factors at the end of the turn and didn't find one that had all the necessary information.