Page 9 of 9

RE: n01487477 Vs. Nemo121

Posted: Thu Aug 08, 2013 2:14 pm
by Amoral
Is your plan to completely ignore your economic problems until you can use total collapse as an excuse to quit the game early? Why are you still moving your carriers and battleships when you know that fuel is short?


RE: n01487477 Vs. Nemo121

Posted: Sun Feb 02, 2014 1:01 am
by Mac Linehan
Sir -

I must say, without heat or offense, that your suggestion that Damien would use such a stratagem as an excuse to bow out of a campaign game is unwarranted and is not true.

As stated in Damien's opening post, this particular modification (on it's first campaign testing) severely changes various aspects of the Japanese economy. I am not privy to the specifics, but strongly suspect that it makes Japanese economic planning and execution a far greater challenge.

Damien and Floyd have contributed tremendously to AE's playability with their extraordinarily detailed and useful Tracker utility.

Damien has always been a man of integrity; I am honored by the generous patience he has shown when answering my questions or helping with a concept that I did not understand. I have nothing but the greatest respect and admiration for both of these men.

I am very saddened by the demise of this AAR; Fionn is a remarkably talented and competent player. It was a treat to watch Damien and Fionn in action; this is a loss for all of us on this forum.

Respectfully Submitted -

Mac