Page 10 of 11

Re: Benchmarking CPU's in Command Modern Operations

Posted: Sun Feb 15, 2026 2:43 pm
by Swant
No I don't

Here's a comparison to 1776

Re: Benchmarking CPU's in Command Modern Operations

Posted: Sat Feb 28, 2026 8:35 am
by Nikel
Fixing the 2 exceptions has improved a lot the performance. From 2331 to 1753.

Still far from the best results in my laptop, just below 1000 ms.

B1825.2.png
B1825.2.png (19.92 KiB) Viewed 1685 times


CMO Benchmark.png
CMO Benchmark.png (27.53 KiB) Viewed 1637 times

Re: Benchmarking CPU's in Command Modern Operations

Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2026 9:25 am
by Nikel
Benchmark B1825.8.png
Benchmark B1825.8.png (18.18 KiB) Viewed 1631 times

Re: Benchmarking CPU's in Command Modern Operations

Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2026 2:58 am
by gennyo
my first "new" computer in 20 years...
running in VMware in Linux, so performance isn't good
but better than my i9-9900t

Re: Benchmarking CPU's in Command Modern Operations

Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2026 10:42 am
by Nikel
B1852 is slower here, may anyone confirm?

Benchmark B1852.png
Benchmark B1852.png (17.86 KiB) Viewed 1170 times

Benchmark B1852 G.png
Benchmark B1852 G.png (28.57 KiB) Viewed 1170 times

Re: Benchmarking CPU's in Command Modern Operations

Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2026 9:18 am
by Knightpawn
Do people who (unlike me) understand the technical aspects agree with the statement below:

'AMD 9955HX3D seems to be be a better choice over Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX considering that CMO's simulation loop (pulse times) is overwhelmingly single-threaded and cache-sensitive'

Re: Benchmarking CPU's in Command Modern Operations

Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2026 10:01 am
by Nikel
Knightpawn wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 9:18 am
'overwhelmingly single-threaded'

That part is false.

You may try yourself changing the affinity for Command.exe to just 1 CPU and you will notice the difference.

Just tried to run the benchmark with 1 CPU and got tired of waiting for it to start :shock:


I cannot comment on the rest, but according to ChatGPT, the cache part is correct.


Who said that?

Re: Benchmarking CPU's in Command Modern Operations

Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2026 10:41 am
by AreusF
Confirmed there is a significant performance hit with version 1852 vs 1825.15

1825.15.jpg
1825.15.jpg (40.24 KiB) Viewed 1105 times
1852.jpg
1852.jpg (44.3 KiB) Viewed 1105 times

Re: Benchmarking CPU's in Command Modern Operations

Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2026 11:19 am
by Nikel
AreusF wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 10:41 am Confirmed there is a significant performance hit with version 1852 vs 1825.15

Was you computer busy with other tasks while performing the benchmark?

Re: Benchmarking CPU's in Command Modern Operations

Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2026 11:55 am
by AreusF
Nikel wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 11:19 am
AreusF wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 10:41 am Confirmed there is a significant performance hit with version 1852 vs 1825.15

Was you computer busy with other tasks while performing the benchmark?
I ran it a few times, rebooted between, and confirmed no processes/tasks were running. All average scores with 1852 were within the range of 5833 - 5875. Reverted back to version 1825.15 and scores were back around 1800.

Re: Benchmarking CPU's in Command Modern Operations

Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2026 12:00 pm
by thewood1
Is it the Steam version or Matrix?

Re: Benchmarking CPU's in Command Modern Operations

Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2026 12:24 pm
by AreusF
thewood1 wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 12:00 pm Is it the Steam version or Matrix?
Steam version

Re: Benchmarking CPU's in Command Modern Operations

Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2026 2:22 pm
by thewood1
I think there have been some reported performance issues with the Steam version on the discord channel.

Re: Benchmarking CPU's in Command Modern Operations

Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2026 4:06 pm
by Knightpawn
thewood1 wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 2:22 pm I think there have been some reported performance issues with the Steam version on the discord channel.
How can they be different (so that performance is affected in different degrees)?

Re: Benchmarking CPU's in Command Modern Operations

Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2026 4:40 pm
by thewood1
Steam has its own underlying infrastructure that games run in or around. It can have an impact at times for some games. Combat Mission ran into this as well at one time.

Re: Benchmarking CPU's in Command Modern Operations

Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2026 6:01 pm
by Knightpawn
I do have a drop but not too terrible. I can live with this — more that I can live without the ability to assign weapons to multiple targets and unit doctrine behaving erratically
Screenshot 2026-04-24 205557.png
Screenshot 2026-04-24 205557.png (110.5 KiB) Viewed 1015 times
Interestingly, It is the first time i got exceptions at the start of the benchmark test
Screenshot 2026-04-24 204453.png
Screenshot 2026-04-24 204453.png (1.38 MiB) Viewed 1015 times

Re: Benchmarking CPU's in Command Modern Operations

Posted: Sat Apr 25, 2026 8:44 pm
by Knightpawn
As a comparison with version 1825.15 (see below) new version (see above) is 22% slower
Screenshot 2026-04-25 233921.png
Screenshot 2026-04-25 233921.png (116.58 KiB) Viewed 956 times

Re: Benchmarking CPU's in Command Modern Operations

Posted: Thu Apr 30, 2026 8:14 pm
by Nikel
B1859 is faster also outside Steam.

B B1859.png
B B1859.png (17.64 KiB) Viewed 832 times
B B1859 G.png
B B1859 G.png (32.08 KiB) Viewed 832 times

Re: Benchmarking CPU's in Command Modern Operations

Posted: Fri May 01, 2026 10:39 am
by AreusF
AreusF wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2026 10:41 am Confirmed there is a significant performance hit with version 1852 vs 1825.15


1825.15.jpg


1852.jpg
B1859 benchmark scores significantly improved over my scores from B1852
1859.jpg
1859.jpg (43.55 KiB) Viewed 802 times

Re: Benchmarking CPU's in Command Modern Operations

Posted: Fri May 01, 2026 2:02 pm
by schweggy
Screenshot 2026-05-01 095707.png
Screenshot 2026-05-01 095707.png (32.81 KiB) Viewed 801 times