RE: Can the map of Australia be improved?
Posted: Tue Oct 26, 2004 1:22 am
Please excuse my spelling. Its a low priority with me.I think my post was quite clear although obviously misunderstood. I'll try again.
I don't believe it was remotely possible to support major operations through Darwin without a large and continuous seabourne supply effort. I may be incorrect and if so let me know, but others who have posted seem to agree and so far no dissenting voice has surfaced.
The game allows supplies to be transfered to Darwin in large quantities via a non-historical rail net. Again I may be wrong but others have posted in detail concerning the inaccuracy of the map in this regard.
Because of this inaccurate rail net it is possible for the allies to mount major operations through Darwin into the DEI. It also will allow JP forces to mount overland operations from N. Austrailia into the remainder of the country. Neither of these operation seem to me possible.
Now all my posts have been quite rational regarding this subject and given in the spirit of improving the game. Perhaps I have misunderstood your last post.
I don't believe it was remotely possible to support major operations through Darwin without a large and continuous seabourne supply effort. I may be incorrect and if so let me know, but others who have posted seem to agree and so far no dissenting voice has surfaced.
The game allows supplies to be transfered to Darwin in large quantities via a non-historical rail net. Again I may be wrong but others have posted in detail concerning the inaccuracy of the map in this regard.
Because of this inaccurate rail net it is possible for the allies to mount major operations through Darwin into the DEI. It also will allow JP forces to mount overland operations from N. Austrailia into the remainder of the country. Neither of these operation seem to me possible.
Now all my posts have been quite rational regarding this subject and given in the spirit of improving the game. Perhaps I have misunderstood your last post.