Page 961 of 1501

RE: THE THREAD!!!

Posted: Mon Mar 08, 2010 7:40 pm
by Chickenboy
ORIGINAL: AW1Steve

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

ORIGINAL: USS America

Looks like I'm in the market for a new car insurance company after 22 years.  My wife was backed into by another car in a parking lot for less than $1000 damages.  Police report clearly stated that the other driver backed into my wife.  We fronted the $250 deductible while waiting for the claim to be settled.  Turns out the other driver is in the same "good hands" that we are.  They chose to ignore the findings of the police report, even after I appealed the decision, and split the fault 50-50.  We eat the $250, which makes my wife furious.  Then, today I get my new policy and see a fairly hefty rate increase due to the "liable claim", which infuriates me.  [:@]

I stayed with State Farm by default after I left my parent's umbrella some time ago. They've always been very good to work with, particularly on our homeowner's side.

July 5 of 2008 saw my wife total our old car in a major MVA. Two idiot teenagers (PUNKS-see the Geezer thread) turned in front of her in an intersection and she T-boned 'em as she proceeded straight through on the green. Luckily no one was seriously hurt.

State Farm settled with us very quickly for the fair market value of the car and included the value of the child safety seats inside the car that were rendered unusable in the wreck. Furthermore, as the other drivers were 100% at fault, they went after the other drivers' insurance company in an effort to reimburse our initial $500 collision deductable. They handled all the legal paperwork and we did have our deductable returned to us by their efforts.

We've had major damage to our homes and cars caused by a Tornado / hail in two of the past three years ($30,000 / $5,500 / $3,500, respectively). They've been very easy and helpful to work with. Easier than contractors, that's for darn sure.

Never a hint of raising our premiums, in spite of all of these issues. I haven't compared rates in a while, but when I did a few years ago they were competitive. When combined with the loyal service, I've got no reason to consider going elsewhere.


They had some major problems in Florida when I was there. If I recall the state insurance commission had to step on them rather severly after thei conduct during hurricane Andrew. Bruce, do you recall anything about it? [&:]
Hurricane Andrew was....are you ready for this...nearly 20 years ago, Steve.

Regardless, they've done right by me for the last 20 years.

RE: THE THREAD!!!

Posted: Mon Mar 08, 2010 7:40 pm
by Chickenboy
Ooh! Looky! A new page for me...

RE: THE THREAD!!!

Posted: Mon Mar 08, 2010 7:44 pm
by USSAmerica
Parole - Tithe. [&o][&o][&o]

RE: THE THREAD!!!

Posted: Mon Mar 08, 2010 7:48 pm
by Chickenboy
ORIGINAL: gladiatt
As an example (one of so many), we had a storm in France 1 week ago. 50 deads. THousand of house flooded.
There was on TV news the example of a familly wich received a letter from insurrances saying they won't give so much money because it was not on the contract [:@] .
Hi Gladiatt,

We've definitely had that problem here too. The classic one is where a company pays for 'wind-blown rain' damage, but *will not* pay for flood coverage. In cases of hurricane, there's a great deal of arguing about whether or not the water damage in the house was caused by tidal surge flooding or the roof being ripped off the house and rain water causing the damage.

Since most residents still had coverage against fire, New Orleans saw a rash of...erm...spontaneous house fires in the months to follow the catastrophe. All accidental, of course.

RE: THE THREAD!!!

Posted: Mon Mar 08, 2010 7:52 pm
by gladiatt
ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

ORIGINAL: gladiatt
As an example (one of so many), we had a storm in France 1 week ago. 50 deads. THousand of house flooded.
There was on TV news the example of a familly wich received a letter from insurrances saying they won't give so much money because it was not on the contract [:@] .
Hi Gladiatt,

We've definitely had that problem here too. The classic one is where a company pays for 'wind-blown rain' damage, but *will not* pay for flood coverage. In cases of hurricane, there's a great deal of arguing about whether or not the water damage in the house was caused by tidal surge flooding or the roof being ripped off the house and rain water causing the damage.

Since most residents still had coverage against fire, New Orleans saw a rash of...erm...spontaneous house fires in the months to follow the catastrophe. All accidental, of course.

[X(] Didn't knew this one.
But it seem New Orleans house are so inflamable

RE: THE THREAD!!!

Posted: Mon Mar 08, 2010 8:09 pm
by AW1Steve
ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

ORIGINAL: AW1Steve

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy




I stayed with State Farm by default after I left my parent's umbrella some time ago. They've always been very good to work with, particularly on our homeowner's side.

July 5 of 2008 saw my wife total our old car in a major MVA. Two idiot teenagers (PUNKS-see the Geezer thread) turned in front of her in an intersection and she T-boned 'em as she proceeded straight through on the green. Luckily no one was seriously hurt.

State Farm settled with us very quickly for the fair market value of the car and included the value of the child safety seats inside the car that were rendered unusable in the wreck. Furthermore, as the other drivers were 100% at fault, they went after the other drivers' insurance company in an effort to reimburse our initial $500 collision deductable. They handled all the legal paperwork and we did have our deductable returned to us by their efforts.

We've had major damage to our homes and cars caused by a Tornado / hail in two of the past three years ($30,000 / $5,500 / $3,500, respectively). They've been very easy and helpful to work with. Easier than contractors, that's for darn sure.

Never a hint of raising our premiums, in spite of all of these issues. I haven't compared rates in a while, but when I did a few years ago they were competitive. When combined with the loyal service, I've got no reason to consider going elsewhere.


They had some major problems in Florida when I was there. If I recall the state insurance commission had to step on them rather severly after thei conduct during hurricane Andrew. Bruce, do you recall anything about it? [&:]
Hurricane Andrew was....are you ready for this...nearly 20 years ago, Steve.

Regardless, they've done right by me for the last 20 years.

Despite the fact that I started a geezer thread CB, I do still know how to use a callender.Same company . Same place. The conditions don't occur every year or we wouldn't have insurance. So we go back to the couple of disasters. What's their track record? I honestly don't know. What does surprise me is that it's not every day a state gives a time out to one of the biggest insurance companies (which I belive was a Florida company) because of perceived misconduct.

I'm delighted that you've had good luck with the company , and sincerely hope that you have continued good luck. But bad experinces with several insurance companies , plus my own experinces as an insurance salesman (well over 25 years ago) make me very,very cautious with companies. The absolute only thing you have to go on is reputation. If a company wants to screw you , generally they can. The only things that keeps companies from doing that is 1) state insurance commissions that run the range of very good consumer advocates to virtual employees of the companies they are supposed to regulate. 2)customers with long memories. [:(]

RE: THE THREAD!!!

Posted: Mon Mar 08, 2010 8:13 pm
by Grollub
G'night gents [>:][>:][>:]

RE: THE THREAD!!!

Posted: Mon Mar 08, 2010 8:17 pm
by AW1Steve
ORIGINAL: Grollub

G'night gents [>:][>:][>:]

Good night Per.[>:]

RE: THE THREAD!!!

Posted: Mon Mar 08, 2010 8:26 pm
by gladiatt
ORIGINAL: AW1Steve

ORIGINAL: Grollub

G'night gents [>:][>:][>:]

Good night Per.[>:]

That's an idea.
Good night everyone

RE: THE THREAD!!!

Posted: Mon Mar 08, 2010 8:36 pm
by AW1Steve
ORIGINAL: gladiatt

ORIGINAL: AW1Steve

ORIGINAL: Grollub

G'night gents [>:][>:][>:]

Good night Per.[>:]

That's an idea.
Good night everyone


Good night Eric. [>:]

RE: THE THREAD!!!

Posted: Mon Mar 08, 2010 8:38 pm
by AW1Steve
BTW , has anybody heard from Stuman? The last post was that he had food poisoning , then he dropped out of sight. [&:][:(][X(]

RE: THE THREAD!!!

Posted: Mon Mar 08, 2010 8:55 pm
by Mynok
ORIGINAL: sprior

I like/d the electronic music og the 80's, especially OMD. They did the only album track I know featuring sonar/asdic pings.

So it was like horror music for you? [:D]

RE: THE THREAD!!!

Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 12:38 am
by Chickenboy
Interesting...no one here and it's only 8:38pm CST...[&:]

RE: THE THREAD!!!

Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 12:47 am
by USSAmerica
ORIGINAL: AW1Steve

BTW , has anybody heard from Stuman? The last post was that he had food poisoning , then he dropped out of sight. [&:][:(][X(]

Steve, I emailed him via his profile a few days ago to see if everything was ok, but have not heard anything back. [:(]

RE: THE THREAD!!!

Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 12:48 am
by Mynok

Not good.

RE: THE THREAD!!!

Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 12:55 am
by Chickenboy
Anybody have a RL non-email contact method for Stuman? Full name and city?

RE: THE THREAD!!!

Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 1:51 am
by scott64
ORIGINAL: USS America

ORIGINAL: AW1Steve

BTW , has anybody heard from Stuman? The last post was that he had food poisoning , then he dropped out of sight. [&:][:(][X(]

Steve, I emailed him via his profile a few days ago to see if everything was ok, but have not heard anything back. [:(]
I too done the same. [:(]

RE: THE THREAD!!!

Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 1:52 am
by scott64
ORIGINAL: USS America

Looks like I'm in the market for a new car insurance company after 22 years.  My wife was backed into by another car in a parking lot for less than $1000 damages.  Police report clearly stated that the other driver backed into my wife.  We fronted the $250 deductible while waiting for the claim to be settled.  Turns out the other driver is in the same "good hands" that we are.  They chose to ignore the findings of the police report, even after I appealed the decision, and split the fault 50-50.  We eat the $250, which makes my wife furious.  Then, today I get my new policy and see a fairly hefty rate increase due to the "liable claim", which infuriates me.  [:@]
I have been with State Farm for over 20 years and they have been very good to me. [:)][8D]

RE: THE THREAD!!!

Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 5:41 am
by Onime No Kyo
ORIGINAL: USS America

Some quick shopping online has turned up Progressive Insurance Company with a very good quote for both of us, and both cars.  Same coverage is actually almost $300 less/6 months than my current Allstate policy, which would be increasing by $330/6 months in April. 

Anyone have any opinions or experience with Progressive? 

Yuri, any "expert" advice?  [:)]

PM sent. [:'(]

RE: THE THREAD!!!

Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 5:44 am
by Dixie
Morning chaps [:)]