Page 98 of 106
RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back.
Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2016 11:18 am
by Mayhemizer_slith
Yes please
RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back.
Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2016 11:26 am
by AllenK
A BB and 2 CA's add 5 points of attacking shore bombardment. For good measure, 2 points of ground support are also added.
The attack goes in a +13. I presume Mayhemizer will call Assault.
Screwed again [:(]

RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back.
Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2016 11:31 am
by brian brian
This game's Tarawa, then
RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back.
Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2016 11:33 am
by AllenK
UK rebases some planes in England and on one of the CV's in the Med.
US rebases P-40 towards Midway.
Nimitz reorgs the Queens.
A pathetic impulse ends.
RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back.
Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2016 5:12 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
J/F 42 Axis 3
No DoW
Italy air, Germany land and Japan naval.
German and Italian FTR's and 2 Italian NAV's to West Med box 2.
Japan:
Escorting ships to some sea areas with convoys.
2 CA's to Cape Naturaliste box 2
6 BB's and CV to South China Sea box 3
3 CV's and 4 CA/CL to The Marianas box 4
2 CA's to East Indian Ocean box 4
CL to SW Indian Ocean box 2
Trans loaded with Formosa MIL to China Sea box 0
Submarines to multiple sea areas
Trans from Manila loaded with INF enters to The Marianas. Do US want to intercept?
Japan is feeling lucky and they want to keep Eniwetok under their control.

RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back.
Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2016 5:37 pm
by AllenK
Yes please. Disorganise a CL.
RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back.
Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2016 5:38 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
Who is going to be disorganized? CL or some CV?
RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back.
Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2016 5:40 pm
by AllenK
A CL, thanks.
RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back.
Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2016 5:43 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
On a 3 Us fleet finds transporter. Japs decide to stay in box 2 even if they are most likely are going to lose Eniwetok.
RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back.
Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2016 5:45 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
South China Sea is declined, lots of naval combats are coming.

RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back.
Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2016 5:48 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
Do Allies want to bring more planes to West Med?
US 6 point P-47B can reach box 1, not shown in picture.

RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back.
Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2016 5:53 pm
by AllenK
No thanks.
RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back.
Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2016 6:01 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
West Med: Axis 2, Allies 10. Only box 0 is chosen.
Axis use 4 points to decrease Allied air combat value and 6 points to increase own air combat value.
First round gives no losses. Axis stay, how about Allies?

RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back.
Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2016 6:04 pm
by AllenK
Abort, thanks. Back to Gibraltar.
RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back.
Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2016 6:04 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
Why Allied result 15 with -3 odds is none?

RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back.
Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2016 6:06 pm
by AllenK
ORIGINAL: Mayhemizer
Why Allied result 15 with -3 odds is none?
Twin engine fighter with the air value in orange effect. Reduces the damage by one category. AX goes to DX. DA goes to NE.
RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back.
Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2016 6:07 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
French ships to Oran and CW CP to Gibraltar.
US FTR to Tripoli? CW FTR to Gibraltar or Cagliari/Olbia in Sardinia?
RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back.
Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2016 6:08 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
Thanks, forgot that twin engine rule.
RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back.
Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2016 6:09 pm
by AllenK
Doesn't that just abort the air combat?
RE: AllenK vs Mayhemizer III: Oil be back.
Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2016 6:10 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
That is very true. Just a second...