Page 2 of 2
RE: [OT] B-52 Over Niagara
Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2007 4:32 am
by bradfordkay
Knavey's got that right... as far as the B52 flight was concerned, an unmarked one makes me think that they were testing out some new electronics...
RE: [OT] B-52 Over Niagara
Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2007 12:02 pm
by AW1Steve
[:)]And would the cost of gas be any cheaper over the B-52's base? Aircrew needs flight time to keep current. That means flying somewhere. I wish I had a dollar for every time flight crews that I was part of flew cross country for lunch. If you have to fly somewhere , you might as well do it over interesting landscape.[:D]
RE: [OT] B-52 Over Niagara
Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2007 12:05 pm
by AW1Steve
ORIGINAL: bradfordkay
Knavey's got that right... as far as the B52 flight was concerned, an unmarked one makes me think that they were testing out some new electronics...
[:)]Or squadron maintainannce has not finished the paint job. (the underside).[:D]