Page 2 of 2
RE: Probably an unnecessary question about stars
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 12:42 am
by MarcA
ORIGINAL: docpaul
something like that?
There's always one who takes it too far [;)]
RE: Probably an unnecessary question about stars
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 1:15 am
by ilovestrategy
I said it before and I'll say it again....The WiTP players are the Bad Boys of Matrix. Making trouble is their game! [:D]
RE: Probably an unnecessary question about stars
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 1:23 am
by Nomad
ORIGINAL: Terminus
3 stars are at 501 posts, IIRC... It's been a while...[:D]
What, that was only a week ago or so. [:)]
RE: Probably an unnecessary question about stars
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 1:56 am
by bradfordkay
ORIGINAL: Terminus
3 stars are at 501 posts, IIRC... It's been a while...[:D]
At about 750 posts/month, Terminus reached 500 posts within three weeks of joining.
For the average human with a real life, it takes a bit longer...
RE: Probably an unnecessary question about stars
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 2:14 am
by Raverdave
Yeah but T doesn't have a life [:D]
RE: Probably an unnecessary question about stars
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 5:22 am
by Ian R
How many is it to get 4 stars?
RE: Probably an unnecessary question about stars
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 10:14 am
by m10bob
ORIGINAL: mantill
Some people just post gratuitously in any thread in a quest to reach a 1000 posts and there 5th star
Don't forget the pizza.
RE: Probably an unnecessary question about stars
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 10:35 am
by DuckofTindalos
ORIGINAL: bradfordkay
ORIGINAL: Terminus
3 stars are at 501 posts, IIRC... It's been a while...[:D]
At about 750 posts/month, Terminus reached 500 posts within three weeks of joining.
For the average human with a real life, it takes a bit longer...
Actually, it's a bit more than 750 posts per month. I've taken a few timeouts for real life...
RE: Probably an unnecessary question about stars
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 10:47 am
by TheElf
This does beg the question...
Clearly when designing this webpage Matrix had no idea how voluminously, and some would argue frivolously, certain members would post.
Perhaps they need to recalibrate the star system or have them begin to change color one at a time as the spammer exponentially increases his (or her...yeah right!) post count?
RE: Probably an unnecessary question about stars
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 10:50 am
by DuckofTindalos
Well, this forum runs on off-the-shelf software, so it's limited how much Matrix can change...
RE: Probably an unnecessary question about stars
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 10:55 am
by TheElf
ORIGINAL: Terminus
Well, this forum runs on off-the-shelf software, so it's limited how much Matrix can change...
So you are saying that it takes prescription strength software to numb the pain you cause? [;)][:D]
I need a Pharmacist!!! Stat![:D]
RE: Probably an unnecessary question about stars
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 11:00 am
by DuckofTindalos
Well, there's one sure-fire way... The Green Button(tm)...
RE: Probably an unnecessary question about stars
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 12:14 pm
by RevRick
Well, since this thread is about the vital data of the number of posts, I will celebrate my 1250th post here. TA DA... and it only took 7 years... I joined the board seven years ago today. Just noticed that...
EGAD!!!
Oh, well. Off to work..
RE: Probably an unnecessary question about stars
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 12:22 pm
by DuckofTindalos
Happy Anniversary, reverend![;)]