Page 2 of 2
RE: 1.03 Work Que
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2008 12:37 pm
by dodod
how about the pp editor?
RE: 1.03 Work Que
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2008 12:42 pm
by MarshallEllis
I have it recorded but I'm not there yet!
RE: 1.03 Work Que
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2008 1:16 pm
by NeverMan
R299: It wasn't (Pr losing minors when it should be Ru), if I remember correctly it was: ("Ru losing minors when it should be Pr). Wasn't that the way? I am just saying in case you are looking at 1 scenario and not able to duplicate and it's the wrong scenario.
R305: This supposedly happened in our game, although I think that maybe the Spanish player had the box checked and didn't realize it.
RE: 1.03 Work Que
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2008 2:22 pm
by bresh
ORIGINAL: NeverMan
R305: This supposedly happened in our game, although I think that maybe the Spanish player had the box checked and didn't realize it.
NeverMan if you refering to me, i did not have accept alliance checked.
Im 100% sure, that means 0 % chance of fault.
1.02K.
It happend also in another pbm game where i play Turkey, this happend earlier and was why i could see it was a bug, only had accept alliance by 2 MPs.(GB/FR)
AS Turkey I proposed alliance to GB, who accepted, but could confirm he had not Turkey checked for accept alliance.
And Austria who was not one of those i had checked, asked alliance, and got just like in the game where I play Spain.
We decided to continue the game since it was our 3. restart. But agreed not to call on allies without any agreement.
Regards
Bresh