RE: Jocks' initial attribute values & skill values
Posted: Sun Nov 09, 2008 7:44 pm
I don't understand a word of you BT chatter 

What's your Strategy?
https://forums.matrixgames.com:443/
ORIGINAL: gazra
I bet multiplayer team games of this computer game would be extremely challenging and so much fun, no matter whether you were on the winning side or losing side!
You're quite right, n48. I will probably do the things that you suggested after I have mastered this game and when I replay the game and am seeking a greater challenge. But my problem is that I find it difficult to roleplay at the expense of having more capable Jocks and Titans. I've found some of the enemy Titans in the 'Deep Core' starter campaign (like the 'Ascension III' and the 'Spiritwalker') to be formidable (even against my "super" Jocks and custom-designed Titans!). I find it difficult to roleplay this game when:n48: "Try doing an experiment: use a balanced approach in your SP games, say, weaker weapons (a single strong weapon on a chassis and a few weaker ones) or even try using pre-made titans consistently... roleplay a little... you'll see how ToS suddenly becomes much more deep and challenging than before, with an even greater replay value! A totally different game..."
I agree with CrushU. I prefer using shields too. They save you a lot of money when repairing armor. The only cases where you wouldn't want your Titans to have active shields are:CrushU: "Generally, I consider shields very much worth it, mostly because while that extra 25 heat from that tesla bolt striking your shields DOES kinda screw your heat up, it's better than 25 damage going into your leg and screwing that up. Heat is easier to fix than armor."
Reading the manual for this computer game gave me the impression that combat in this computer game seemed more ruthless than in BATTLETECH. However, now that I have actually PLAYED this computer game a bit, I now agree with you, SireChaos, that MechWarriors in BATTLETECH have a much greater chance of dying in battles. A single head shot by an AC/20, Gauss Rifle, or Clan ER PPC will instantly kill a MechWarrior. What was I thinking?SireChaos: "I would say BT is more "ruthless", i.e. deadly."
I only have old editions of the BATTLETECH rule books and Technical Readouts (that date back to 1992 or earlier), so I'm not familiar with the Battle Values of 'Mechs, and I don't know anything about "level 2 rules", "BV2 rules", "double-blind movement", "the BV2 system", or the "Blitzkrieg" and "Fire Moth" and "Ice Ferret" 'Mechs. According to my calculations, CrushU's above 'Mech design would not be able to have full armor (i.e. 19 tons for 304 armor points) - it would be 1 ton short of being able to have full armor.CrushU: "Five CLPLs+TC and 52 Heatsinks on a 3/5 move Clan Assault with full armor"
In the 3rd printing of 'The BattleTech Compendium' (1990), an optional rule is that 'Mechs without hand and lower arm actuators are able to flip both arms over during the Reaction Phase rather than perform a torso twist, which then allows any arm-mounted weapons to fire into the rear firing arc. Note that BattleMechs that are constructed without lower arm and hand actuators suffer no weapons fire penalties for lacking these components. Another benefit of a 'Mech having no hand and lower arm actuators is that the 'Mech's cost (in C-Bills) is cheaper. Quite frankly, why a 'Mech would have hand and lower arm actuators in the first place is beyond me!SireChaos: "And there´s the mech´s weakness... ridiculous rear armor, no rear-facing weapons"
Yes, but it is an optional rule in the 3rd printing of 'The BattleTech Cempendium' (1990). Titans of Steel: Warring Suns uses a lot of the rules from BATTLETECH, which is one of the reasons why this computer game is superb.SireChaos: "Do the rules you use include the ability of energy weapons to set fire to woods?"
Why is the game called 'Invasion 3042' when the Clans invaded the Inner Sphere in 3049?CrushU: "I play Invasion 3042"
The following quote is from page 7 of the Revised Second Printing of 'BattleTech Technical Readout: 3050': "Each Clan warrior selects his own target, and it appears to be dishonorable to allow another warrior to help in a kill". SireChaos, if you were roleplaying Clan MechWarriors, then they would be dishonored for using such tactics.SireChaos: "And there´s the mech´s weakness... ridiculous rear armor, no rear-facing weapons, no arm-mounted weapons. If the battlefield has any kind of cover (which they almost invariably have), a reasonably fast enemy (8/12 movement would be great, preferably with jump jets) can get close enough to it to get into its rear as soon as it wins initiative; then, one solid hit will lay open the rear armor and score critical hits. Anyway, I´ve never played double blind, but from what you describe, my tactics against that mech would be to use two fast units with low BV, maybe Vipers or Ice Ferrets, and get them on either side of this mech - it could not turn in any way that would not have it end up with its back turned to one of them. That, and/or use fast-moving units that stay in the CLPL´s long range bracket, to keep your unit´s to-hit modifiers high."
In that case, SireChaos, CrushU would need to roll 9 or better (with 2d6) to hit your 'Mech if your 'Mech had no cover. That's a 27.777 % chance that each of his 5 Clan Large Pulse Lasers has to hit your 'Mech, which means that he is statistically likely to hit your 'Mech with at least one of the Clan Large Pulse Lasers each turn. If, however, SireChaos' 'Mech also had woods cover, then his 'Mech is statistically likely to not be hit at all. Which leaves the rather obvious question of just how SireChaos is actually going to defeat CrushU's ultimate 'Mech whilst SireChaos' 'Mechs are running around at long range with their +6 penalty (even worse if CrushU's 'Mech has any woods cover) to hit with their weapons due to range and their movement. CrushU's "perfect" 'Mech does have one slight weakness - his maximum weapon range is 20 hexes. If SireChaos was to use 'Mechs with longer range weapons like the Gauss Rifle, ER PPC, and Clan ER Large Laser, then, so long as he was able to keep his 'Mechs just out of CrushU's 'Mech's weapon range, SireChaos would be able to fire at CrushU's 'Mech until it was toast - it would be a LONG battle, though!SireChaos: "And, if you keep running 10+ hexes per turn, and stay within the long range bracket, you´ll get a total modifier of +8 to your enemies´to-hit roll. Even with those -3, that´s a +5, for a 2d6 roll, the more so if you, too, are in a woods hex, or there are some woods in the line of fire.
LarkinVB, considering that you co-made 'Titans of Steel: Warring Suns', how can that computer game contain so many of the rules of BATTLETECH if you don't know anything about BATTLETECH?LarkinVB: "I don't understand a word of your BT chatter"
The following were my custom designs for the "perfect" 'Mech in BATTLETECH that I came up with back in the mid 1990's:SireChaos: "Kinda off-topic, but I am sort of curious what those "perfect designs" for BattleTech are."
1. Half of the Titans have names that are from 'Mechs in BATTLETECH (in my opinion, it is sacrilege to use classic 'Mech names like the Warhammer, Marauder, Battlemaster, Awesome, Behemoth, and Atlas anywhere else but in BATTLETECH!).
2. A lot of the default Titans in v1.2.1 of the game are not optimally designed.
3. The way the game determines the initial attribute values and skill values of new Jock recruits is so unfair!
4. The different weapons in this game are not balanced - some weapons (like the Light Meson Gun, Heavy Meson Gun, Neutron Blaster, E.M. Pulser, Black Ray Gun, Tesla Bolt, Plasma Gun, and Gauss Cannon) are much better than others!
5. The game allows you to custom design your own Titans.
The above 5 issues need to be fixed in a game-balancing patch before players can truly roleplay this game (or before I can, at the very least).
ORIGINAL: gazra
I find it difficult to roleplay this game when:
1. Half of the Titans have names that are from 'Mechs in BATTLETECH (in my opinion, it is sacrilege to use classic 'Mech names like the Warhammer, Marauder, Battlemaster, Awesome, Behemoth, and Atlas anywhere else but in BATTLETECH!).
2. A lot of the default Titans in v1.2.1 of the game are not optimally designed.
3. The way the game determines the initial attribute values and skill values of new Jock recruits is so unfair!
4. The different weapons in this game are not balanced - some weapons (like the Light Meson Gun, Heavy Meson Gun, Neutron Blaster, E.M. Pulser, Black Ray Gun, Tesla Bolt, Plasma Gun, and Gauss Cannon) are much better than others!
5. The game allows you to custom design your own Titans.
The above 5 issues need to be fixed in a game-balancing patch before players can truly roleplay this game (or before I can, at the very least).
Reading the manual for this computer game gave me the impression that combat in this computer game seemed more ruthless than in BATTLETECH. However, now that I have actually PLAYED this computer game a bit, I now agree with you, SireChaos, that MechWarriors in BATTLETECH have a much greater chance of dying in battles. A single head shot by an AC/20, Gauss Rifle, or Clan ER PPC will instantly kill a MechWarrior. What was I thinking?
Quite frankly, why a 'Mech would have hand and lower arm actuators in the first place is beyond me!
The following quote is from page 7 of the Revised Second Printing of 'BattleTech Technical Readout: 3050': "Each Clan warrior selects his own target, and it appears to be dishonorable to allow another warrior to help in a kill". SireChaos, if you were roleplaying Clan MechWarriors, then they would be dishonored for using such tactics.
I realize that BATTLETECH copied some of the 'Mechs from ROBOTECH, and that the old Amiga computer game Steel Empire (also known as Cyber Empires) had 'Mechs named the 'Behemoth' and 'Titan' around the same time that BATTLETECH released the 'Behemoth' and 'Grand Titan' 'Mechs in 1992, so BATTLETECH isn't completely original either. But, to me, every 'Mech name in the BattleTech Technical Readouts 2750, 3025 and 3050 are sacred and should not be used anywhere else. How hard is it to come up with some new names for Titans that haven't been used before in other 'Mech games? Be creative and give 'Titans of Steel: Warring Suns' its own unique, rich universe.Thorgrim: "Should those words be removed from dictionaries, so that they're not accidentally used in other games?"
You don't need to tell me that. Isn't it pathetic just how poorly designed almost all of them are? At least the default Titans in this computer game don't suffer from that problem.Thorgrim: "BTW, BT official designs are nowhere near optimized..."
With 5 Clan Large Pulse Lasers, 26 double heat sinks, and a targeting computer, why would you even consider making a club attack, or let an enemy 'Mech get within melee range of your 'Mech for that matter? I'd probably rather have a 'Mech that was able to flip its arms over than a 'Mech that was able to pick up a club and also make punch attacks without any penalties.Thorgrim: "Well, when you'll want to pick something up from the battlefield (a severed arm to use as a club for instance), you'll find out."
Thanks for teaching me about that, Thorgrim. I wasn't aware of that. What exactly are "stravags"? Do you mean ComStar's Com Guards? Or is it a derisive slang term used by Clan MechWarriors to describe Inner Sphere MechWarriors?Thorgrim: "You might want to read further into the BT storyline. This wasn't exactly followed by *all* Clans, and it even got dumped after they took several ugly beatings from the IS stravags. Also notice that the Clans started assimilating IS MechWarriors after the invasion, and not all of them followed strict Clan doctrine - Phelan Kell/Ward/Wolf ring a bell? This worked well while the Clans had the technological superiority.
I couldn't agree more! My favourite era of BATTLETECH is 3025, before the Federated Commonwealth and the Clan invasion detracted from the BATTLETECH universe's rich background.Thorgrim: "The BT storyline got a little "out of control" after the invasion IMO, and the boardgame too as a consequence."