Page 2 of 2

RE: How the west was won

Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2009 11:22 pm
by kirk23_MatrixForum
Hi O6 Maestro,
I agree it would make an interesting game, I did not mean to offend anyone with the post!

By the way although Japan attacked the USA before declaring war officially I would guess Japan also have a reason to distrust the USA thanks to the Atomic bombs ?

But it did end the war very much sooner!

RE: How the west was won

Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2009 11:26 pm
by kirk23_MatrixForum
By the way Punk Reaper,
I'm trying to get all the Scottish builders who are out off work just now to help rebuild Hadrians wall. Hehehehe[:D]

RE: How the west was won

Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2009 11:27 pm
by Mac67
ORIGINAL: hellfirejet
Scotland v England have had our share off history as well

Now that was biased, you had Mel Gibson on your side [;)]

Image

RE: How the west was won

Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2009 11:30 pm
by PunkReaper
Don't get me started about Mel Gibson and Braveheart....... What a rubbish film...... He makes up his history as he goes along. Now If he played General Custer he would have beaten the Indians and managed to blame the English. [:@][:@]

RE: How the west was won

Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2009 11:31 pm
by kirk23_MatrixForum
Yes and he looks braw wearing a skirt big jessie [:D] Oh no it was a KILT not a skirt hehehehe[:)]

RE: How the west was won

Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2009 11:33 pm
by kirk23_MatrixForum
He was good in Patriot [:)] He did win single handed did he not ?[:D]

RE: How the west was won

Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2009 11:37 pm
by PunkReaper
Only because he was writing the script. I'm surprised he wasn't allowed to survive in the film and become king if England

RE: How the west was won

Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2009 11:38 pm
by Erik Rutins
Don't worry about it, Hellfirejet. I don't think it would be an easy conflict to model though and probably not as interesting as you think. There's a lot of history there with plenty of conflict on all sides and some fairly even battles at times, but I don't think it really would make a good wargame. The overall strategic picture was not a balanced one and the long-term outcome was never really in doubt. Plus, as you can see, it's a touchy subject.

Guys, I understand why some of you got up in arms given the way some parts of the original post were phrased, but seriously. If we can discuss wargames involving Nazi Germany, I certainly would have thought we could handle discussing Custer.

With that said, I'm locking this up given how folks have already gotten worked up, tossing around terms like genocide.

Regards,

- Erik