Page 2 of 2
RE: Not Involved in Battle issue
Posted: Tue Apr 14, 2009 3:21 pm
by bresh
There used to be a suggestion about how to "combine" movement of allied nations,
changing the allys move-phase to be just after his ally.
Though there was still the issue about "battles" having to wait till "all" combined-moving allies had done their land/naval move.
Like who decides order etc when not all battles involve "all-allies".
Regards
Bresh
RE: Not Involved in Battle issue
Posted: Wed Apr 22, 2009 8:43 am
by NeverMan
Marshall,
You have everything you have asked for, can you give us a status update on this problem?
RE: Not Involved in Battle issue
Posted: Wed Apr 22, 2009 11:45 am
by MarshallEllis
Did I get the French land?
I've got several emails but can somebody the email it came from?
RE: Not Involved in Battle issue
Posted: Wed Apr 22, 2009 3:36 pm
by NeverMan
ORIGINAL: Marshall Ellis
Did I get the French land?
I've got several emails but can somebody the email it came from?
Yes, I believe the French player emailed you the French land phase ~week ago.
RE: Not Involved in Battle issue
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 11:46 am
by MarshallEllis
Who is the French player???
RE: Not Involved in Battle issue
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 3:55 pm
by NeverMan
ORIGINAL: Marshall Ellis
Who is the French player???
Lew.
RE: Not Involved in Battle issue
Posted: Mon Apr 27, 2009 9:57 am
by MarshallEllis
Ok then ... nope, I do not have a Lew in my mailbox.
Please resend, if you can...