Page 2 of 2
RE: remember the original wargame construction set
Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 5:25 pm
by JudgeDredd
I did know what Eriks point was. My point was it was too much work to make immersive.
Ok, "too much work" is a bit harsh, but I don't expect to work when I want to play a game...I simply want to load and, erm, play.
But hey - people love it. I got rid of it faster than I bought it.
Edited for spelling as usual! [>:]
RE: remember the original wargame construction set
Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 6:08 pm
by Erik Rutins
Judge,
Hey, it's a subjective thing. Personally, I love AT and still play it.
Regards,
- Erik
RE: remember the original wargame construction set
Posted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 12:16 am
by madgamer2
I find this term "Immersion" each of us seems to define it a bit different so perhaps we should open a thread to allow each to present there version of what the heck it means.
What ever it is there is more to it than "I want to be there" kind of statement. So lets here so of the deffinitions of what it means.
Madgamer
RE: remember the original wargame construction set
Posted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 12:17 am
by madgamer2
A-M-E-N!!!!!!!!!!
Madgamer
RE: remember the original wargame construction set
Posted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 1:13 am
by Greybriar
ORIGINAL: Hertston
Well, it was better than UMS. Just not much.. [;)]
I never played
UMS: The Universal Military Simulator. Surely it wasn't any worse than
UMS II, was it? (By the way, I posted the link to an eBay auction because of the images of the retail game box and its contents and not to advocate anyone buying it--for $69.99 U.S.)