What's your Strategy?
https://forums.matrixgames.com:443/
It would have been a developers' in-house discussion. They are the people who know how the software is put together, what works and what is likely to cause flow-on consequences in the rest of the game.Bleck forgive me I heard no such discussion. When was it discussed?
Thank you Tom I misunderstood his meaning I thought it was in the posts sorry about that.ORIGINAL: Tomokatu
It would have been a developers' in-house discussion. They are the people who know how the software is put together, what works and what is likely to cause flow-on consequences in the rest of the game.Bleck forgive me I heard no such discussion. When was it discussed?
Don't expect to be privy to all their planning.
S'OK![:)]Thank you Tom I misunderstood his meaning I thought it was in the posts sorry about that
Just imagine what it could be if Wastelands had invested some time in fixing the naval game in 1.60.ORIGINAL: gwgardner
with these new reports it's much easier to determine the effectiveness of raider activities, for instance. I just sent out three uboats to three sea zones, got reports back that they destroyed 10 STPs overall this turn, and I lost one of the subs. Easy to see in this instance, at this tech level, that the uboat campaign isn't paying off. For the first time in this game I'm paying attention to the nuances of the naval game. Before these reports, I was just blowing the uboat war off.
ORIGINAL: gwgardner
I ignored the naval for the most part too, but no more. It is really a new dimension for the game.
Just imagine what it could be if Wastelands had invested some time in fixing the naval game in 1.60.