RE: Campaign End of Game
Posted: Thu Dec 24, 2009 4:01 pm
Looks like Ontong Java was the graveyard of the IJN
Many more with 30+ victories...
Page 2 of 2
RE: Campaign End of Game
Posted: Thu Dec 24, 2009 4:01 pm
Allied Aces:
Many more with 30+ victories...
Many more with 30+ victories...
RE: Campaign End of Game
Posted: Thu Dec 24, 2009 4:09 pm
ORIGINAL: Andy Mac
Looks like Ontong Java was the graveyard of the IJN
It was...
The IJN had a fixation on hitting Moresby and Milne Bay, then cruising down to the Solomons to get polished off.[;)][:D]
Just about every capital ship was done in by Allied LBA.
RE: Campaign End of Game
Posted: Thu Dec 24, 2009 4:33 pm
ORIGINAL: Admiral Scott
ORIGINAL: bsq
ORIGINAL: CarnageINC
Wow, look at the operational loss ratio vs. sorties flown! What would account for this huge of a margin?
0.09% doesn't look at all bad...
Compare it to the allied human player results.
That is the allied human result, 9 losses for every 10000 sorties, compared to just over double that for the Japanese (who would suffer from declining pilot quality given all the other losses - so it looks about right).
RE: Campaign End of Game
Posted: Thu Dec 24, 2009 5:22 pm
Hmmmmm anything thats a fixation is wrong I will take a look at it .... agian.
RE: Campaign End of Game
Posted: Thu Dec 24, 2009 6:13 pm
Curious at Missions over 1000 plus for pilots, I thought the Allied pilots rotate out after so many missions?
Am I incorrect? Just an assumption.
Am I incorrect? Just an assumption.
RE: Campaign End of Game
Posted: Thu Dec 24, 2009 9:27 pm
Just the Americans I think.
That's probably why so many Commonwealth pilots are at the top of the list.
US rotation keeps out any heavy hitters.[:D]
That's probably why so many Commonwealth pilots are at the top of the list.
US rotation keeps out any heavy hitters.[:D]
RE: Campaign End of Game
Posted: Thu Dec 24, 2009 9:30 pm
I was also curious about the C-47 air kills.
I never flew them into contested air space.
Is this a way for the AI to gain more points?
More than likely the losses were operational.
I never flew them into contested air space.
Is this a way for the AI to gain more points?
More than likely the losses were operational.
RE: Campaign End of Game
Posted: Thu Dec 24, 2009 10:45 pm
Halsey -
Congratulatons for staying the course and finishing the game - that alone is worthy of note!
Mac
Congratulatons for staying the course and finishing the game - that alone is worthy of note!
Mac
RE: Campaign End of Game
Posted: Thu Dec 24, 2009 11:03 pm
Congrats Halsey...
What was your difficulty setting?
What was your difficulty setting?
RE: Campaign End of Game
Posted: Thu Dec 24, 2009 11:04 pm
Thanks!
I'm going to continue the slaughter in this game.
Want to see the later Allied toys.[;)]
Waiting for THE final patch, then I'll give the Japanese a whirl.[:D]
I'm going to continue the slaughter in this game.
Want to see the later Allied toys.[;)]
Waiting for THE final patch, then I'll give the Japanese a whirl.[:D]
RE: Campaign End of Game
Posted: Fri Dec 25, 2009 12:08 am
You mean the game has an ending[:D]
Congrats on Finishing one out
Congrats on Finishing one out
RE: Campaign End of Game
Posted: Fri Dec 25, 2009 5:10 am
As a former tester I was still looking for bugs.
Later war stuff that might've been missed in the shuffle.
Good news is that I haven't had many.
The game played pretty well, with only a few CTD's.
Mostly on the air withdrawl screen, when I tried to upgrade a unit from there.
Played on historical.
Didn't want to get frustrated with results that I thought might be wacky.[:D]
Besides, I knew later on in the game, my focus would be on moving troops.
Invasions and troop reinforcement has become an art now.[;)]
Later war stuff that might've been missed in the shuffle.
Good news is that I haven't had many.
The game played pretty well, with only a few CTD's.
Mostly on the air withdrawl screen, when I tried to upgrade a unit from there.
Played on historical.
Didn't want to get frustrated with results that I thought might be wacky.[:D]
Besides, I knew later on in the game, my focus would be on moving troops.
Invasions and troop reinforcement has become an art now.[;)]